Paper · 2010

New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight

Bernd Rodemann; Tim Baumgarten

11
claims
33
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) caused by Fusarium graminearum (Schwabe) and Fusarium culmorum (W.G. Smith Sacc.) belongs to the most damaging diseases in cereal crops. Actually mycotoxin contamination of human food and animal feed became a more important feature than direct yield losses that often occur irregularly. F. graminearum and F. culmorum were described to produce Deoxynivalenol (DON), but also ability to produce DON derivates and zearalenone has been recognized in some isolates of both species. These trichothecenes are phytotoxins and causes chlorosis, necrosis and wilting. The aim of contribution was to estimate efficacy of new fungicide for controlling fusarium head blight in wheat. Additionally the protective and curative effects of fungicide compounds were tested. For measuring the efficacy severity and incidence was assessed. Also the yield, fusarium damaged kernel (FDK) and Deoxynivalenol-content in grains were determined. The investigations were performed in field trials over two years using artificial inoculation methods and a randomized block design with four replicates. For testing the fungicide efficacy maize residues / debris were applied as an inoculum source. They were distributed on the plots in winter months. Spray inoculation was used for investigation of protective and curative fungicide effects. In addition to natural inoculum, plots were inoculated with 250.000 conidia /ml of F. culmorum at mid anthesis. Fusarium severity and incidence was determined 21, 24 and 28 days after inoculation. After harvest, yield, DON concentration and fusarium damaged kernels were quantificated.For reduction of fusarium head blight prothioconazole, tebuconazole and the tank mix of epoxiconazole + metconazole resulted in the best efficacy levels of 70-90%. Comparing these data with DON reduction so a high correlation (r = 0.86; P = 0.01) was determined. As a new fusarium fungicide thiophanate-methyl produced a positive effect on DON-reduction while the reduction of visible symptoms was only moderate. Analyzing the treatments for optimal fungicide timing spraying 36-48 hours after inoculation showed the best efficacy of 80-90%. Applications days before inoculation the disease control was reduced nearly 10-20%. The efficacy to control fusarium head blight was improved by mixing the triazoles with morpholines (SBI, class II, amine). A faster uptake of the active ingredient could be provided.In all fungicide treatments an incremental yield was measured.The study demonstrated a positive linear relationship between DON and Fusarium head blight reduction by using modern new fungicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

prothioconazole achieved 70–90% efficacy against Fusarium head blight.

Treatment
prothioconazolee0
Outcome
fusarium head blighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70-90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For reduction of fusarium head blight prothioconazole, tebuconazole and the tank mix of epoxiconazole + metconazole resulted in the best efficacy levels of 70-90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

tebuconazole achieved 70–90% efficacy against Fusarium head blight.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
fusarium head blighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70-90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For reduction of fusarium head blight prothioconazole, tebuconazole and the tank mix of epoxiconazole + metconazole resulted in the best efficacy levels of 70-90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

the tank mix of epoxiconazole + metconazole achieved 70–90% efficacy against Fusarium head blight.

Treatment
the tank mix of epoxiconazole + metconazolee0
Outcome
fusarium head blighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
70-90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For reduction of fusarium head blight prothioconazole, tebuconazole and the tank mix of epoxiconazole + metconazole resulted in the best efficacy levels of 70-90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1788 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide efficacy and DON reduction were strongly correlated.

Treatment
fungicidest0
Outcome
DON reductione0
Value
r = 0.86e0
Qualifier
P = 0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparing these data with DON reduction so a high correlation (r = 0.86; P = 0.01) was determined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1887 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate-methyl reduced DON.

Treatment
thiophanate-methyle0
Outcome
DON-reductione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiophanate-methyl produced a positive effect on DON-reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–1979 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiophanate-methyl only moderately reduced visible symptoms.

Treatment
thiophanate-methyle0
Outcome
visible symptomse0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
only moderatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiophanate-methyl produced a positive effect on DON-reduction while the reduction of visible symptoms was only moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–2037 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying 36–48 hours after inoculation achieved the best efficacy of 80–90%.

Treatment
spraying 36-48 hours after inoculatione0
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
beste0
Value
80-90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying 36-48 hours after inoculation showed the best efficacy of 80-90%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2093–2166 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application days before inoculation reduced disease control by nearly 10–20%.

Treatment
Applications days before inoculatione0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
reducede0
Value
10-20%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications days before inoculation the disease control was reduced nearly 10-20%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2250 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing triazoles with morpholines improved Fusarium head blight control.

Treatment
mixing the triazoles with morpholinese0
Outcome
efficacy to control fusarium head blighte0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The efficacy to control fusarium head blight was improved by mixing the triazoles with morpholines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2252–2350 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fungicide treatments increased yield.

Treatment
all fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
incrementale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all fungicide treatments an incremental yield was measured”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2434–2495 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DON and Fusarium head blight reductions had a positive linear relationship under modern fungicides.

Treatment
modern new fungicidese0
Outcome
DON and Fusarium head blight reductione0
Direction
positive linear relationshipe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The study demonstrated a positive linear relationship between DON and Fusarium head blight reduction by using modern new fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2496–2627 · show in text ↑
t0

“New aspects in use of fungicides for control Fusarium head blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–697 · show in text ↑

metconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

epoxiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

prothioconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

thiophanate-methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

triazoles · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.