Paper · 2002 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference

Effects of fungicides applied at anthesis on Fusarium head blight and mycotoxins in wheat

M.G. Cromey; R.A. Parkes; K.I. Sinclair; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) of wheat can cause yield losses of 3070 More importantly affected grain may be less palatable to stock than healthy grain and may contain mycotoxins A field trial in 2000/01 tested several fungicides and fungicide combinations for FHB control FHB incidence was 91 in untreated plots The greatest reduction of FHB incidence grain Fusarium and mycotoxins was achieved with triazoles a benzimadazole or a combination of these Strobilurin fungicides reduced FHB although less effectively than the triazoles and carbendazim but Fusarium incidence was greater in grain harvested from strobilurintreated plots than in grain from untreated plots Combining strobilurin fungicides with fungicides from other groups did not further reduce Fusarium levels in harvested grain Nine Fusarium species and Microdochium nivale were isolated from grain harvested from the trial Fusarium graminearum and F avenaceum were most commonly isolated with F crookwellense and F culmorum also common

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FHB incidence was 91 in untreated plots of the field trial.

Outcome
FHB incidencee0
Value
91e0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FHB incidence was 91 in untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–309 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest reduction of FHB incidence, grain Fusarium and mycotoxins was achieved with triazoles, a benzimidazole or a combination of these.

Treatment
triazoles a benzimadazole or a combination of thesee0
Outcome
FHB incidence grain Fusarium and mycotoxinse0
Direction
greatest reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest reduction of FHB incidence grain Fusarium and mycotoxins was achieved with triazoles a benzimadazole or a combination of these”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–449 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strobilurin fungicides reduced FHB, although less effectively than the triazoles and carbendazim.

Treatment
Strobilurin fungicidese0
Outcome
FHBe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
triazoles and carbendazime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strobilurin fungicides reduced FHB although less effectively than the triazoles and carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–545 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium incidence was greater in grain from strobilurin-treated plots than in grain from untreated plots.

Treatment
strobilurintreated plotse0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium incidencee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
untreated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium incidence was greater in grain harvested from strobilurintreated plots than in grain from untreated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combining strobilurin fungicides with fungicides from other groups did not further reduce Fusarium levels in harvested grain.

Treatment
Combining strobilurin fungicides with fungicides from other groupse0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
Fusarium levels in harvested graine0
Direction
did not further reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining strobilurin fungicides with fungicides from other groups did not further reduce Fusarium levels in harvested grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nine Fusarium species and Microdochium nivale were isolated from grain harvested from the trial.

Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Second interactor
Microdochium nivaleMicrodochium nivalee0pathogen
Outcome
Nine Fusarium species and Microdochium nivalee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Microdochium nivale
Microdochium nivale · Second interactorThis image was created by user Tim Sage (NMNR) at Mushroom Observer , a source for mycological images. You can contact this user here . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nine Fusarium species and Microdochium nivale were isolated from grain harvested from the trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium graminearum and F. avenaceum were the most commonly isolated species from the grain.

Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
F avenaceumFusarium avenaceume0pathogen
Outcome
most commonly isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · Second interactorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum and F avenaceum were most commonly isolated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. crookwellense and F. culmorum were also common among the isolates.

Interactor
F crookwellenseFusarium cerealise0pathogen
Second interactor
F culmorumFusarium culmorume0pathogen
Outcome
also commone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · Second interactorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“F crookwellense and F culmorum also common”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑

triazoles · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fungicide · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 22 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.