Paper · 2003 · Plant Disease

Influence of Wheat Cultivar, Species of Fusarium, and Isolate Aggressiveness on the Efficacy of Fungicides for Control of Fusarium Head Blight

Á. Mesterházy; T. Bartók; C. Lamper

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
204
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Attempts to control Fusarium head blight (FHB) with fungicides have been highly variable. Variability is caused by cultivar resistance, fungicide efficacy, fungicide coverage, timing, and pathogen aggressiveness. In this research, fungicides were tested on winter wheat cultivars with different levels of resistance to FHB using different isolates of Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum to evaluate the role of host resistance and isolate aggressiveness on severity of FHB. Fungicides were applied to groups of wheat heads to provide full coverage. Incidence and severity of FHB was measured by the severity of head symptoms, percentage of Fusarium-damaged kernels (FDK), yield loss, and deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination. Development of FHB was affected by fungicides, cultivars, fungal isolates, and most of the two-way interactions of these variables. Among the fungicides tested, those containing tebuconazole tended to be more effective in reducing FHB. Reduction of disease in susceptible cultivars may not be adequate to produce marketable yields under conditions of high disease pressure. In most cases, if a fungicide reduced FHB visual symptoms, similar decreases were detected in yield loss, DON concentration, and FDK reaction. In 1998, an increase in DON contamination compared with the Fusarium check was observed with azoxystrobin and carbendazim on the more susceptible cultivar. This increase in DON with some fungicide requires additional research. Research to develop more resistant cultivars, better spraying technology, and more effective fungicides is also needed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Head blight development varied with fungicides, cultivars, isolates and most pairwise interactions.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Interactor
fungal isolatese0pathogen
Outcome
Development of FHBe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Development of FHB was affected by fungicides, cultivars, fungal isolates, and most of the two-way interactions of these variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicides containing tebuconazole tended to reduce head blight more effectively.

Treatment
those containing tebuconazolee0
Outcome
FHBe0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
fungicides testede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the fungicides tested, those containing tebuconazole tended to be more effective in reducing FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease reduction in susceptible cultivars might be insufficient for marketable yield under high disease pressure.

Material
susceptible cultivarse0
Outcome
marketable yieldse0
Qualifier
under conditions of high disease pressuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduction of disease in susceptible cultivars may not be adequate to produce marketable yields under conditions of high disease pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced visual head blight symptoms generally coincided with reduced yield loss, DON concentration and damaged kernels.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
yield loss, DON concentration, and FDK reactione0
Direction
decreasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most cases, if a fungicide reduced FHB visual symptoms, similar decreases were detected in yield loss, DON concentration, and FDK reaction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin increased DON contamination in the more susceptible cultivar in 1998 relative to the Fusarium check.

Material
more susceptible cultivare0
Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
DON contaminatione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Fusarium checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998, an increase in DON contamination compared with the Fusarium check was observed with azoxystrobin and carbendazim on the more susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim increased DON contamination in the more susceptible cultivar in 1998 relative to the Fusarium check.

Material
more susceptible cultivare0
Treatment
carbendazime0
Outcome
DON contaminatione0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
Fusarium checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1998, an increase in DON contamination compared with the Fusarium check was observed with azoxystrobin and carbendazim on the more susceptible cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for research on DON increases associated with some fungicides.

Outcome
additional researche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This increase in DON with some fungicide requires additional research”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend work on resistant cultivars, spraying technology and more effective fungicides.

Outcome
more resistant cultivars, better spraying technology, and more effective fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Research to develop more resistant cultivars, better spraying technology, and more effective fungicides is also needed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1469–1587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–18 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.