Abstract
Chemical soil treatment and seed dressing had a good control effect on wheat take-all and also could affect the wheat yield.Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.Compared with the control group,Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days,while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days;the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area,and the average control effects of 3% Dividend,2.5% Celest,12.5% Latitude,3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest,6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%,51.2%,83.3%,66.4%,81.7%,57.4% respectively;compared with the control group,the average control effect of the late dry ear rates were 85.3%,80.0%,97.3%,78.6%,84.0%,52.0% respectively;seed dressing with 2.5% Celest produced the highest yield,while seed dressing with 12.5% Latitude produced low yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Jianshixiao delayed secondary root symptoms by 8~10 days.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Jianshixiaoe0
- Outcome
- damage symptoms of secondary rootse0
- Direction
- delaye0
- Value
- 8~10 dayse0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Jianshixiao had root damage control effect 57.4%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Jianshixiaoe0
- Outcome
- control effectse0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 57.4%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Jianshixiao had dry ear control effect 72.0%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Jianshixiaoe0
- Outcome
- late dry ear ratese0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 72.0%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Jianshixiao increased yield by 31.1%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Jianshixiaoe0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 31.1%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
70% Thiophanate Methyl delayed secondary root symptoms by 8~10 days.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 70% Thiophanate Methyle0
- Outcome
- damage symptoms of secondary rootse0
- Direction
- delaye0
- Value
- 8~10 dayse0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
70% Thiophanate Methyl had root damage control effect 32.9%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 70% Thiophanate Methyle0
- Outcome
- control effectse0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 32.9%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
70% Thiophanate Methyl had dry ear control effect 66.6%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 70% Thiophanate Methyle0
- Outcome
- late dry ear ratese0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 66.6%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
70% Thiophanate Methyl increased yield by 22.3%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 70% Thiophanate Methyle0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 22.3%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
50% Carbendazim delayed secondary root symptoms by 8~10 days.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 50% Carbendazime0
- Outcome
- damage symptoms of secondary rootse0
- Direction
- delaye0
- Value
- 8~10 dayse0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
50% Carbendazim had root damage control effect 21.8%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 50% Carbendazime0
- Outcome
- control effectse0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 21.8%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
50% Carbendazim had dry ear control effect 56.0%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 50% Carbendazime0
- Outcome
- late dry ear ratese0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 56.0%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
50% Carbendazim increased yield by 18.6%.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 50% Carbendazime0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.6%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different chemical soil treatments,like Jianshixiao,70% Thiophanate Methyl or 50% Carbendazim,could delay damage symptoms of secondary roots about 8~10 days compared with the control group,and the control effects of them were 57.4%,32.9%,21.8% respectively;their control effects of the late dry ear rates were 72.0%,66.6%,56.0% respectively compared with the control dry ear rate 0.75%;the yield increased 31.1%,22.3%,18.6% respectively compared with the yield of the control group.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Jianhebao delayed root symptoms 12 days.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Jianhebaoe0
- Outcome
- damage symptoms of rootse0
- Direction
- delaye0
- Value
- 12 dayse0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the control group,Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days,while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days;the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area,and the average control effects of 3% Dividend,2.5% Celest,12.5% Latitude,3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest,6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%,51.2%,83.3%,66.4%,81.7%,57.4% respectively;compared with the control group,the average control effect of the late dry ear rates were 85.3%,80.0%,97.3%,78.6%,84.0%,52.0% respectively;seed dressing with 2.5% Celest produced the highest yield,while seed dressing with 12.5% Latitude produced low yield.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Other seed dressings delayed root symptoms 16~18 days.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- other seed dressing methodse0
- Outcome
- damage symptoms of rootse0
- Direction
- delaye0
- Value
- 16~18 dayse0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the control group,Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days,while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days;the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area,and the average control effects of 3% Dividend,2.5% Celest,12.5% Latitude,3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest,6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%,51.2%,83.3%,66.4%,81.7%,57.4% respectively;compared with the control group,the average control effect of the late dry ear rates were 85.3%,80.0%,97.3%,78.6%,84.0%,52.0% respectively;seed dressing with 2.5% Celest produced the highest yield,while seed dressing with 12.5% Latitude produced low yield.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Comprehensive treatment had 90.6% root damage control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- comprehensive treatmente0
- Outcome
- damage degree of the secondary rootse0
- Direction
- controle0
- Value
- 90.6%e0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the control group,Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days,while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days;the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area,and the average control effects of 3% Dividend,2.5% Celest,12.5% Latitude,3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest,6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%,51.2%,83.3%,66.4%,81.7%,57.4% respectively;compared with the control group,the average control effect of the late dry ear rates were 85.3%,80.0%,97.3%,78.6%,84.0%,52.0% respectively;seed dressing with 2.5% Celest produced the highest yield,while seed dressing with 12.5% Latitude produced low yield.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Celest seed dressing produced the highest yield.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 2.5% Celeste0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the control group,Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days,while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days;the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area,and the average control effects of 3% Dividend,2.5% Celest,12.5% Latitude,3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest,6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%,51.2%,83.3%,66.4%,81.7%,57.4% respectively;compared with the control group,the average control effect of the late dry ear rates were 85.3%,80.0%,97.3%,78.6%,84.0%,52.0% respectively;seed dressing with 2.5% Celest produced the highest yield,while seed dressing with 12.5% Latitude produced low yield.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
Claim · model-written summary
Latitude seed dressing produced low yield.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 12.5% Latitudee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- lowe0
- Comparator
- control groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with the control group,Jianhebao could delay damage symptoms of roots 12 days,while other seed dressing methods could delay 16~18 days;the research on the damage degree of the secondary roots indicated that the average control effect was 90.6% in the comprehensive treatment area,and the average control effects of 3% Dividend,2.5% Celest,12.5% Latitude,3% Dividend with 2.5% Celest,6% Raxil or Jianhebao were 75.7%,51.2%,83.3%,66.4%,81.7%,57.4% respectively;compared with the control group,the average control effect of the late dry ear rates were 85.3%,80.0%,97.3%,78.6%,84.0%,52.0% respectively;seed dressing with 2.5% Celest produced the highest yield,while seed dressing with 12.5% Latitude produced low yield.”
t0“Effects of Chemical Treatment on the Wheat Take-all Control and the Wheat Yield Factor”
The same questions in other papers
carbendazim · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →carbendazim · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
carbendazim · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →thiophanate-methyl · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiophanate-methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.