Browse

Walk the dataset by one view at a time. Every count is a number of claims (or papers, for the scope-judgment view).

How the claims are classified

Each view counts claims; click a row to open it.

By research area

Eight research areas of plant science, then claim type. A claim can sit in several areas, so counts overlap.

  1. Breeding, agronomy & horticulture5,163,403
  2. Physiology, metabolism & abiotic stress4,567,272
  3. Plant interactions & biotic stress2,634,899
  4. Woody plants2,325,814
  5. Molecular genetics & genomics1,514,735
  6. Ecology, evolution & diversity1,336,267
  7. Development, reproduction & morphology1,096,213
  8. Methods & resources684,532
Open

By claim type

What kind of statement a claim is: observation, intervention effect, association, mechanism, method result or recommendation.

  1. Observation5,452,332
  2. Intervention effect3,371,900
  3. Association1,305,555
  4. Method / resource684,532
  5. Mechanism480,632
  6. Recommendation463,767
Open

By polarity

Whether the reported effect is positive, negative, absent or mixed for the plant or study goal, as the authors present it.

  1. Non-evaluative6,263,511
  2. Positive3,709,643
  3. Negative1,220,780
  4. No effect501,948
  5. Mixed62,836
Open

By publication decade

Publication year from OpenAlex, grouped by decade.

and 44,323 more · 1660s–1940s

Open

By scope judgment

How the model judged each paper, with its reason. Lists papers, not claims.

  1. Core plant research1,799,903
  2. Off topic1,393,095
  3. Adjacent228,302
  4. Insufficient evidence124,906
Open

Organisms, genes and names

Normalised through NCBI Taxonomy, NCBI Gene and ChEBI, or listed as the abstracts spell them.