Paper · 2004 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effect of fungicides on the development of Fusarium head blight, yield and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat inoculated under field conditions with Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum

Miriam Haidukowski; Michelangelo Pascale; Giancarlo Perrone; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
153
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of different fungicide treatments on Fusarium head blight (FHB) development, grain yields and deoxynivalenol (DON) accumulation in wheat was evaluated after artificial inoculation under field conditions with a mixture of Fusarium graminearum and F culmorum . The trials were carried out using commercially available products on five different cultivars of soft and durum wheat (Serio, Genio, Bracco, Duilio and Orobel) in two separate experimental fields located in the North of Italy. Treatments with Tiptor ® S (cyproconazole plus prochloraz) and a mixture of Horizon ® 250 EW (tebuconazole) plus Amistar ® 250 SC (azoxystrobin) significantly reduced the FHB disease severity (by between 25 and 77%) and DON content (by between 32 and 89%) in the grain as compared with the inoculated control. Yields (tonne ha −1 ) and thousand grain weight (TGW) were higher in plots subjected to fungicide treatments. Tetraconazole (Eminent ® 40 EW) showed a markedly reduced effectiveness compared with the other treatments. Regression analysis showed a strong correlation of disease severity with DON levels (positive correlation) and with yields or TGW (negative correlation) for individual cultivars and locations. Fusarium graminearum , F culmorum and F poae were the species most commonly isolated from all trials, including inoculated and non‐inoculated control plots. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tiptor S and the Horizon plus Amistar mixture reduced FHB severity by 25 to 77%.

Treatment
Tiptor ® S (cyproconazole plus prochloraz) and a mixture of Horizon ® 250 EW (tebuconazole) plus Amistar ® 250 SC (azoxystrobin)e0
Outcome
FHB disease severitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
between 25 and 77%e0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with Tiptor ® S (cyproconazole plus prochloraz) and a mixture of Horizon ® 250 EW (tebuconazole) plus Amistar ® 250 SC (azoxystrobin) significantly reduced the FHB disease severity (by between 25 and 77%) and DON content (by between 32 and 89%) in the grain as compared with the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicides reduced grain DON content by 32 to 89%.

Treatment
Tiptor ® S (cyproconazole plus prochloraz) and a mixture of Horizon ® 250 EW (tebuconazole) plus Amistar ® 250 SC (azoxystrobin)e0
Outcome
DON contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
between 32 and 89%e0
Comparator
inoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments with Tiptor ® S (cyproconazole plus prochloraz) and a mixture of Horizon ® 250 EW (tebuconazole) plus Amistar ® 250 SC (azoxystrobin) significantly reduced the FHB disease severity (by between 25 and 77%) and DON content (by between 32 and 89%) in the grain as compared with the inoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide treatment increased yields and thousand grain weight.

Treatment
fungicide treatmentse0
Outcome
Yields (tonne ha −1 ) and thousand grain weight (TGW)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields (tonne ha −1 ) and thousand grain weight (TGW) were higher in plots subjected to fungicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tetraconazole was less effective than the other fungicides.

Treatment
Tetraconazole (Eminent ® 40 EW)e0
Outcome
effectivenesse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tetraconazole (Eminent ® 40 EW) showed a markedly reduced effectiveness compared with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1032 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity correlated positively with DON levels.

Outcome
DON levelse0
Direction
positive correlatione0
Comparator
disease severitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regression analysis showed a strong correlation of disease severity with DON levels (positive correlation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease severity correlated negatively with yields and thousand grain weight.

Outcome
yields or TGWe0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Comparator
disease severitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with yields or TGW (negative correlation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“disease severity with DON levels (positive correlation) and with yields or TGW (negative correlation)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

F. graminearum, F. culmorum and F. poae were most commonly isolated.

Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
species most commonly isolatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium graminearum , F culmorum and F poae were the species most commonly isolated from all trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑

prochloraz · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cyproconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fungicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 232 positive, 30 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.