Paper · 2001 · Plant Pathology

Fungicidal effects of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole on phyllosphere fungi, senescence and yield of winter wheat

J. R. Bertelsen; E. De Neergaard; V. Smedegaard‐Petersen

20
claims
43
verbatim quotes
192
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of the fungicides azoxystrobin (a strobilurin) and epoxiconazole (a sterol biosynthesis inhibitor) on phyllosphere fungi, senescence and yield were studied in winter wheat in field trials free of visible disease and under controlled environmental conditions. In two field trials, treatments with each of the two fungicides prolonged green leaf area retention and increased yield compared with untreated control plots. Azoxystrobin maintained green leaf area for longer than epoxiconazole and, in one trial, treatments with azoxystrobin gave a greater yield response than epoxiconazole. Mycelial growth on leaf surfaces, mainly originating from saprophytic fungi, was reduced by each of the fungicides. Papilla formation and hypersensitive reactions, almost exclusively against infection attempts by Mycosphaerella spp. (most probably M. graminicola ), occurred with high frequency in the leaves. These defence reactions presumably incurred a significant energy cost, accelerating plant senescence. Fewer defence reactions were recorded in azoxystrobin‐treated leaves than in epoxiconazole‐treated and untreated leaves. Inoculation in a glasshouse experiment with the saprophytic fungi Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium macrocarpum accelerated wheat senescence. Control of the saprophytes by azoxystrobin or epoxiconazole treatments caused a delay in the accelerated senescence, but without significant increase in above‐ground biomass and yield. Neither fungicide influenced senescence, above‐ground biomass or yield in noninoculated wheat plants. In growth chamber experiments azoxystrobin inhibited spore germination and mycelial growth of A. alternata and C. macrocarpum . Epoxiconazole had little inhibitory effect on spore germination, but strongly inhibited mycelial growth of both saprophytes. Both fungicides reduced A. alternata ‐induced papilla formation in wheat leaves, with epoxiconazole being more effective. Inoculation with either of the two saprophytes did not significantly increase wheat leaf respiration, in contrast to inoculation with the nonhost pathogen Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei . Treatment with azoxystrobin did not affect this latter increase in respiration whereas it was reduced by epoxiconazole treatment. It is proposed that the greater inhibition of infection attempts from Mycosphaerella spp. by azoxystrobin, compared with epoxiconazole, may account for the greater yield given by azoxystrobin in field plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin prolonged green leaf area retention and increased winter wheat yield against untreated plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobine1
Outcome
green leaf area retention and increased yielde0
Direction
prolongede0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with each of the two fungicides prolonged green leaf area retention and increased yield compared with untreated control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–428 · show in text ↑
e1

“azoxystrobin (a strobilurin) and epoxiconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–76 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epoxiconazole prolonged green leaf area retention and increased winter wheat yield against untreated plots.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
epoxiconazolee1
Outcome
green leaf area retention and increased yielde0
Direction
prolongede0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with each of the two fungicides prolonged green leaf area retention and increased yield compared with untreated control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–428 · show in text ↑
e1

“epoxiconazole (a sterol biosynthesis inhibitor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–110 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin maintained green leaf area longer than epoxiconazole.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Azoxystrobine0
Outcome
green leaf areae0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
epoxiconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azoxystrobin maintained green leaf area for longer than epoxiconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one trial, azoxystrobin produced a greater yield response than epoxiconazole.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
in one triale0
Comparator
epoxiconazolee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in one trial, treatments with azoxystrobin gave a greater yield response than epoxiconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin reduced mostly saprophytic mycelial growth on wheat leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobine1
Interactor
saprophytic fungie0other
Outcome
Mycelial growth on leaf surfacese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycelial growth on leaf surfaces, mainly originating from saprophytic fungi, was reduced by each of the fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“azoxystrobin (a strobilurin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–58 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epoxiconazole reduced mostly saprophytic mycelial growth on wheat leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
epoxiconazolee1
Interactor
saprophytic fungie0other
Outcome
Mycelial growth on leaf surfacese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mycelial growth on leaf surfaces, mainly originating from saprophytic fungi, was reduced by each of the fungicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“epoxiconazole (a sterol biosynthesis inhibitor)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–110 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Papilla formation and hypersensitive reactions to probable Mycosphaerella graminicola infection were frequent in wheat leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella spp.Mycosphaerellae0pathogen
Outcome
Papilla formation and hypersensitive reactionse0
Direction
high frequencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mycosphaerella
Mycosphaerella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Michal Maňas · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Papilla formation and hypersensitive reactions, almost exclusively against infection attempts by Mycosphaerella spp. (most probably M. graminicola ), occurred with high frequency in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that wheat defence reactions cost energy and accelerated senescence.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
plant senescencee0
Direction
acceleratinge0
Qualifier
significant energy coste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These defence reactions presumably incurred a significant energy cost, accelerating plant senescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin treated wheat leaves had fewer defence reactions than epoxiconazole treated and untreated leaves.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobin‐treatede0
Outcome
defence reactionse0
Direction
Fewere0
Comparator
epoxiconazole‐treated and untreated leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fewer defence reactions were recorded in azoxystrobin‐treated leaves than in epoxiconazole‐treated and untreated leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternaria alternata inoculation accelerated wheat senescence.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0other
Outcome
wheat senescencee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Setting
glasshousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation in a glasshouse experiment with the saprophytic fungi Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium macrocarpum accelerated wheat senescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cladosporium macrocarpum inoculation accelerated wheat senescence.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
Cladosporium macrocarpumCladosporium macrocarpume0other
Outcome
wheat senescencee0
Direction
acceleratede0
Setting
glasshousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation in a glasshouse experiment with the saprophytic fungi Alternaria alternata and Cladosporium macrocarpum accelerated wheat senescence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide control of saprophytes delayed accelerated senescence without significant biomass or yield gain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobin or epoxiconazole treatmentse0
Interactor
saprophytese0other
Outcome
accelerated senescencee0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control of the saprophytes by azoxystrobin or epoxiconazole treatments caused a delay in the accelerated senescence, but without significant increase in above‐ground biomass and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1461 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither fungicide influenced senescence, biomass or yield in noninoculated wheat.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
senescence, above‐ground biomass or yielde0
Direction
Neithere0
Comparator
noninoculated wheat plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither fungicide influenced senescence, above‐ground biomass or yield in noninoculated wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin inhibited Alternaria and Cladosporium spore germination and mycelial growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0other
Second interactor
C. macrocarpumCladosporium macrocarpume0other
Outcome
spore germination and mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“azoxystrobin inhibited spore germination and mycelial growth of A. alternata and C. macrocarpum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epoxiconazole had little effect on saprophyte spore germination but strongly inhibited mycelial growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Epoxiconazolee0
Outcome
spore germinatione0
Direction
little inhibitory effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Epoxiconazole had little inhibitory effect on spore germination, but strongly inhibited mycelial growth of both saprophytes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both fungicides reduced Alternaria induced papilla formation, with epoxiconazole more effective.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Interactor
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0other
Outcome
papilla formatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both fungicides reduced A. alternata ‐induced papilla formation in wheat leaves, with epoxiconazole being more effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–1938 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saprophyte inoculation did not significantly raise wheat leaf respiration, unlike nonhost Erysiphe inoculation.

Treatment
Inoculation with either of the two saprophytese0
Interactor
saprophytese0other
Outcome
wheat leaf respiratione0
Direction
did not significantly increasee0
Comparator
inoculation with the nonhost pathogen Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordeie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with either of the two saprophytes did not significantly increase wheat leaf respiration, in contrast to inoculation with the nonhost pathogen Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1939–2126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azoxystrobin did not affect Erysiphe induced wheat respiration increase.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Interactor
Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordeiBlumeria hordeie1pathogen
Outcome
increase in respiratione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with azoxystrobin did not affect this latter increase in respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2127–2205 · show in text ↑
e1

“nonhost pathogen Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2124 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epoxiconazole reduced Erysiphe induced wheat respiration increase.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
epoxiconazole treatmente0
Interactor
Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordeiBlumeria hordeie1pathogen
Outcome
increase in respiratione2
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was reduced by epoxiconazole treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2255 · show in text ↑
e1

“nonhost pathogen Erysiphe graminis f.sp. hordei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2124 · show in text ↑
e2

“increase in respiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2182–2205 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors propose stronger inhibition of Mycosphaerella infection attempts explains greater yield with azoxystrobin.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
azoxystrobine0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella spp.Mycosphaerellae0pathogen
Outcome
greater yielde0
Qualifier
may accounte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mycosphaerella
Mycosphaerella · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Michal Maňas · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the greater inhibition of infection attempts from Mycosphaerella spp. by azoxystrobin, compared with epoxiconazole, may account for the greater yield given by azoxystrobin in field plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2277–2463 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–112 · show in text ↑

azoxystrobin · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

epoxiconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

azoxystrobin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

azoxystrobin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

epoxiconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · physiology: respiration · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

fungicide · Alternaria alternata · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.