Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Presence of the Weakly Pathogenic Fusarium poae in the Fusarium Head Blight Disease Complex Hampers Biocontrol and Chemical Control of the Virulent Fusarium graminearum Pathogen

Jiang Tan; Noémie De Zutter; Sarah De Saeger; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is caused by a consortium of mutually interacting Fusarium species. In the field, the weakly pathogenic F. poae often thrives on the infection sites of the virulent F. graminearum . In this ecological context, we investigated the efficacy of chemical and biocontrol agents against F. graminearum in wheat ears. For this purpose, one fungicide comprising prothioconazole + spiroxamine and two bacterial biocontrol strains, Streptomyces rimosus LMG 19352 and Rhodococcus sp. R-43120 were tested for their efficacy to reduce FHB symptoms and mycotoxin (deoxynivalenol, DON) production by F. graminearum in presence or absence of F. poae . Results showed that the fungicide and both actinobacterial strains reduced FHB symptoms and concomitant DON levels in wheat ears inoculated with F. graminearum . Where Streptomyces rimosus appeared to have direct antagonistic effects, Rhodococcus and the fungicide mediated suppression of F. graminearum was linked to the archetypal salicylic acid and jasmonic acid defense pathways that involve the activation of LOX1 , LOX2 and ICS . Remarkably, this chemical- and biocontrol efficacy was significantly reduced when F. poae was co-inoculated with F. graminearum . This reduced efficacy was linked to a suppression of the plant’s intrinsic defense system and increased levels of DON. In conclusion, our study shows that control strategies against the virulent F. graminearum in the disease complex causing FHB are hampered by the presence of the weakly pathogenic F. poae . This study provides generic insights in the complexity of control strategies against plant diseases caused by multiple pathogens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide reduced head blight symptoms in wheat ears infected with F. graminearum.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
FHB symptomse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the fungicide and both actinobacterial strains reduced FHB symptoms and concomitant DON levels in wheat ears inoculated with F. graminearum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both actinobacterial strains reduced head blight symptoms in wheat ears infected with F. graminearum.

Treatment
both actinobacterial strainse0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
FHB symptomse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the fungicide and both actinobacterial strains reduced FHB symptoms and concomitant DON levels in wheat ears inoculated with F. graminearum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicide reduced DON levels in infected wheat ears.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
DON levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the fungicide and both actinobacterial strains reduced FHB symptoms and concomitant DON levels in wheat ears inoculated with F. graminearum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–857 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both actinobacterial strains reduced DON levels in infected wheat ears.

Treatment
both actinobacterial strainse0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
DON levelse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that the fungicide and both actinobacterial strains reduced FHB symptoms and concomitant DON levels in wheat ears inoculated with F. graminearum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–857 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Streptomyces rimosus appeared to act through direct antagonism.

Interactor
Streptomyces rimosusStreptomyces rimosuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
direct antagonistic effectse0

Not reportedTaxonQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Streptomyces rimosus appeared to have direct antagonistic effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–929 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhodococcus-mediated suppression was linked to salicylic and jasmonic acid defense pathways with LOX1, LOX2 and ICS activation.

Interactor
Rhodococcuse0biocontrol_agent
Gene
LOX1 , LOX2 and ICSe0
Compound
salicylic acid and jasmonic acide0
Outcome
suppression of F. graminearume0

Not reportedTaxonQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Rhodococcus and the fungicide mediated suppression of F. graminearum was linked to the archetypal salicylic acid and jasmonic acid defense pathways that involve the activation of LOX1 , LOX2 and ICS .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1131 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide-mediated suppression was linked to salicylic and jasmonic acid defense pathways with LOX1, LOX2 and ICS activation.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Gene
LOX1 , LOX2 and ICSe0
Compound
salicylic acid and jasmonic acide0
Outcome
suppression of F. graminearume0

Not reportedTaxonQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Rhodococcus and the fungicide mediated suppression of F. graminearum was linked to the archetypal salicylic acid and jasmonic acid defense pathways that involve the activation of LOX1 , LOX2 and ICS .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculated F. poae significantly reduced chemical and biological control efficacy against F. graminearum.

Treatment
F. poae was co-inoculated with F. graminearume0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Second interactor
F. poaeFusarium poaee0pathogen
Outcome
chemical- and biocontrol efficacye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium poae
Fusarium poae · Second interactorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this chemical- and biocontrol efficacy was significantly reduced when F. poae was co-inoculated with F. graminearum .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1261 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced control efficacy was linked to suppression of intrinsic plant defense.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
reduced efficacye0
Qualifier
suppression of the plant’s intrinsic defense systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“This reduced efficacy was linked to a suppression of the plant’s intrinsic defense system and increased levels of DON.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced control efficacy was linked to increased DON levels.

Taxon
plante0
Outcome
levels of DONe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
reduced efficacye0

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0

“This reduced efficacy was linked to a suppression of the plant’s intrinsic defense system and increased levels of DON.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1380 · show in text ↑

fungicide · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.