Abstract
Effects of SiO2 NPs and Rhizobium leguminosarum alone and in combination was observed on the Meloidogyne incognita and Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi on pea. Inoculation of plants with M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone or in combination caused a significant reduction in plant growth, chlorophyll, carotenoid and increase proline content over un-inoculated control. Application of R. leguminosarum increased plant growth over plants without R. leguminosarum. Use of NPs as seed priming with R. leguminosarum caused a greater increase in plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid in plants with pathogens than application of R. leguminosarum with foliar spray. High root nodulation was observed in plants with R. leguminosarum but only few without R. leguminosarum. Both pathogens had adverse effect on root nodulation. Blight disease indices, galling and multiplication of M. incognita were reduced by NPs or R. leguminosearum but higher reduction was observed with NPs seed priming plus R. leguminosearum.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen inoculation reduced pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoids and increased proline relative to uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Inoculation of plants with M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisie0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Second interactor
- P. syringae pv. pisi
Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisie0pathogen - Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll, carotenoide0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- un-inoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone or in combination caused a significant reduction in plant growth, chlorophyll, carotenoid and increase proline content over un-inoculated control”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Pathogen inoculation increased pea proline content.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Inoculation of plants with M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisie0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- P. syringae pv. pisiPseudomonas syringae pv. pisie0pathogen
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- un-inoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone or in combination caused a significant reduction in plant growth, chlorophyll, carotenoid and increase proline content over un-inoculated control”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium increased pea growth relative to plants without it.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Application of R. leguminosarume0
- Interactor
- R. leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont - Outcome
- plant growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- plants without R. leguminosarume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of R. leguminosarum increased plant growth over plants without R. leguminosarum”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanoparticle seed priming with Rhizobium increased growth, chlorophyll and carotenoids more than Rhizobium with foliar spray in pathogen infected plants.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- NPs as seed priming with R. leguminosarume0
- Interactor
- R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
- Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoide0
- Direction
- greater increasee0
- Qualifier
- in plants with pathogense0
- Comparator
- application of R. leguminosarum with foliar spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of NPs as seed priming with R. leguminosarum caused a greater increase in plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid in plants with pathogens than application of R. leguminosarum with foliar spray”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium treated plants had high root nodulation versus few nodules without Rhizobium.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- plants with R. leguminosarume0
- Interactor
- R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
- Outcome
- root nodulatione0
- Direction
- Highe0
- Comparator
- without R. leguminosarume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“High root nodulation was observed in plants with R. leguminosarum but only few without R. leguminosarum”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Both pathogens adversely affected pea root nodulation.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisiPseudomonas syringae pv. pisit0pathogen
- Outcome
- root nodulatione0
- Direction
- adverse effecte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both pathogens had adverse effect on root nodulation”
t0“pea caused by Meloidogyne incognita and Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanoparticles or Rhizobium reduced blight indices, galling and nematode multiplication; the combination gave the greater reduction.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- NPs seed priming plus R. leguminosearume0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- R. leguminosearume0symbiont
- Outcome
- Blight disease indices, galling and multiplication of M. incognitae0
- Direction
- higher reductione0
- Comparator
- NPs or R. leguminosearume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Blight disease indices, galling and multiplication of M. incognita were reduced by NPs or R. leguminosearum but higher reduction was observed with NPs seed priming plus R. leguminosearum”
t0“pea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium leguminosarum · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Rhizobium leguminosarum · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Rhizobium leguminosarum · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
Meloidogyne incognita · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.