Abstract
Abstract Effects of Pseudomonas putida and zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) alone and in combination was observed in plants grown with bacterized seeds with Rhizobium leguminosarum for the management of Meloidogyne incognita and Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi on pea ( Pisum sativum ). Inoculation of M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone and both together reduced plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content over uninoculated control. Use of P. putida and ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1 (foliar spray/seed priming) alone and in combination resulted in a significant increase in plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants. Seed priming with ZnO NPs was better than NPs foliar spray in increasing plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content of plants with pathogens. Use of P. putida plus NPs seed priming was better than its use with foliar spray in increasing plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoid. Bacterization with R. leguminosarum caused sufficient root nodulation and nodulation was better in plants with P. putida than in plants with ZnO NPs. Both test pathogens had adverse effect on root nodulation. Blight disease indices, galling, and nematode population were also greatly reduced when P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priming.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
M. incognita inoculation reduced pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content versus uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Inoculation of M. incognitae0
- Interactor
- M. incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone and both together reduced plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content over uninoculated control.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. syringae pv. pisi inoculation reduced pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content versus uninoculated plants.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. syringae pv. pisie0
- Interactor
- P. syringae pv. pisi
Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisie0pathogen - Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone and both together reduced plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content over uninoculated control.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Coinoculation with both pathogens reduced pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- both togethere0
- Interactor
- M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- P. syringae pv. pisiPseudomonas syringae pv. pisie0pathogen
- Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculation of M. incognita and P. syringae pv. pisi alone and both together reduced plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content over uninoculated control.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. putida significantly increased pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putidae0
- Interactor
- P. putida
Pseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoide0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- pathogen-inoculated plantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of P. putida and ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1 (foliar spray/seed priming) alone and in combination resulted in a significant increase in plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1 significantly increased pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1e0
- Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoide0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- pathogen-inoculated plantse0
Not reportedInteractorInteractor roleComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of P. putida and ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1 (foliar spray/seed priming) alone and in combination resulted in a significant increase in plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. putida and ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1 significantly increased pea growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putida and ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1e0
- Interactor
- P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoide0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- pathogen-inoculated plantse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of P. putida and ZnO NPs 0.10 ml −1 (foliar spray/seed priming) alone and in combination resulted in a significant increase in plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated plants.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
ZnO nanoparticle seed priming was better than foliar spray for growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid in pathogen-inoculated pea.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Seed priming with ZnO NPse0
- Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid contente0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Qualifier
- plants with pathogense0
- Comparator
- NPs foliar spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed priming with ZnO NPs was better than NPs foliar spray in increasing plant growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid content of plants with pathogens.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. putida with nanoparticle seed priming outperformed its foliar spray combination for growth, chlorophyll and carotenoid.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putida plus NPs seed priminge0
- Interactor
- P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoide0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- foliar spraye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Use of P. putida plus NPs seed priming was better than its use with foliar spray in increasing plant growth, chlorophyll, and carotenoid.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
R. leguminosarum bacterization caused root nodulation.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Bacterization with R. leguminosarume0
- Interactor
- R. leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont - Outcome
- root nodulatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacterization with R. leguminosarum caused sufficient root nodulation and nodulation was better in plants with P. putida than in plants with ZnO NPs.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Root nodulation was better with P. putida than with ZnO nanoparticles.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putidae0
- Interactor
- P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Second interactor
- R. leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
- Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- ZnO NPse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacterization with R. leguminosarum caused sufficient root nodulation and nodulation was better in plants with P. putida than in plants with ZnO NPs.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Both test pathogens adversely affected pea root nodulation.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Both test pathogense0
- Outcome
- root nodulatione0
- Direction
- adverse effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both test pathogens had adverse effect on root nodulation.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. putida plus ZnO nanoparticle seed priming greatly reduced Blight disease indices.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priminge0
- Interactor
- P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- Blight disease indicese0
- Direction
- greatly reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Blight disease indices, galling, and nematode population were also greatly reduced when P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priming.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. putida plus ZnO nanoparticle seed priming greatly reduced galling.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priminge0
- Interactor
- P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- gallinge0
- Direction
- greatly reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Blight disease indices, galling, and nematode population were also greatly reduced when P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priming.”
t0“pea”
Claim · model-written summary
P. putida plus ZnO nanoparticle seed priming greatly reduced nematode population.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priminge0
- Interactor
- P. putidaPseudomonas putidae0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- nematode populatione0
- Direction
- greatly reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Blight disease indices, galling, and nematode population were also greatly reduced when P. putida was used with ZnO NPs seed priming.”
t0“pea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium leguminosarum · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Pseudomonas putida · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
zinc oxide · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
zinc oxide · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Meloidogyne incognita · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
nanoparticle · disease · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.