Paper · 2012 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

COINOCULATION OFRHIZOBIUM LEGUMINOSARUM-PR1 WITH A COLD TOLERANTPSEUDOMONASSP. IMPROVES IRON ACQUISITION, NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND GROWTH OF FIELD PEA (PISUM SATIVUML.)

Pankaj K. Mishra; Shekhar C. Bisht; Smita Mishra; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
55
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of a cold tolerant Pseudomonas sp. Strain, PGERs17, on nodulation, iron acquisition and nutrient uptake of field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42) seedling was determined on the basis of iron acquisition and growth promotion, chlorophyll content, physiologically available iron, Leghaemoglobin from nodules, nitrogen (N) uptake, phosphorus (P) uptake, potassium (K) uptake, iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn) uptake of shoots. Coinoculation of PGERs17 with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1 significantly (P > 0.05) increased nodulation (156.2%) and 57.1% higher plant biomass. Coinoculation enhanced total chlorophyll content (31.5%), physiologically available iron (106.7%), total iron (95.9%) and 17.5-fold higher leghaemoglobin concentration in root nodules over uninoculated control plants. Coinoculation also enhance N uptake (66.3%), P uptake (23.3%), K uptake (47.1%), and 2.75-fold higher Zn uptake of shoots compare with uninoculated control. Hence, cold tolerant Pseudomonas sp. strain PGERs17 can be employed as a bioinoculant along with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1 to enhance plant growth, iron acquisition and nutrient uptake of field pea enhance plant growth, iron acquisition and nutrient uptake of field pea seedlings at cold temperature conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased pea nodulation by 156.2%.

Taxon
field peae1
Material
VL Matar 42e1
Treatment
Coinoculation of PGERs17 with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1e0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1e0symbiont
Second interactor
PGERs17e0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
156.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation of PGERs17 with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1 significantly (P > 0.05) increased nodulation (156.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation produced 57.1% higher pea biomass.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculation of PGERs17 with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1e0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1e0symbiont
Second interactor
PGERs17e0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
57.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation of PGERs17 with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1 significantly (P > 0.05) increased nodulation (156.2%) and 57.1% higher plant biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–581 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased pea total chlorophyll content by 31.5% over uninoculated controls.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
31.5%e0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation enhanced total chlorophyll content (31.5%), physiologically available iron (106.7%), total iron (95.9%) and 17.5-fold higher leghaemoglobin concentration in root nodules over uninoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased pea physiologically available iron by 106.7% over uninoculated controls.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
physiologically available irone0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
106.7%e0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation enhanced total chlorophyll content (31.5%), physiologically available iron (106.7%), total iron (95.9%) and 17.5-fold higher leghaemoglobin concentration in root nodules over uninoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased pea total iron by 95.9% over uninoculated controls.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
total irone0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
95.9%e0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation enhanced total chlorophyll content (31.5%), physiologically available iron (106.7%), total iron (95.9%) and 17.5-fold higher leghaemoglobin concentration in root nodules over uninoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation increased pea leghaemoglobin concentration by 17.5-fold over uninoculated controls.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
leghaemoglobin concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
17.5-folde0
Comparator
uninoculated control plantse0

Not reportedInteractor

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation enhanced total chlorophyll content (31.5%), physiologically available iron (106.7%), total iron (95.9%) and 17.5-fold higher leghaemoglobin concentration in root nodules over uninoculated control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation enhanced pea shoot N uptake by 66.3%.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
66.3%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation also enhance N uptake (66.3%), P uptake (23.3%), K uptake (47.1%), and 2.75-fold higher Zn uptake of shoots compare with uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation enhanced pea shoot P uptake by 23.3%.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
23.3%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation also enhance N uptake (66.3%), P uptake (23.3%), K uptake (47.1%), and 2.75-fold higher Zn uptake of shoots compare with uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation enhanced pea shoot K uptake by 47.1%.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
K uptakee0
Direction
enhancee0
Value
47.1%e0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation also enhance N uptake (66.3%), P uptake (23.3%), K uptake (47.1%), and 2.75-fold higher Zn uptake of shoots compare with uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coinoculation enhanced pea shoot Zn uptake by 2.75-fold.

Taxon
field peae1
Treatment
Coinoculatione0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.75-folde0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Verbatim

e0

“Coinoculation also enhance N uptake (66.3%), P uptake (23.3%), K uptake (47.1%), and 2.75-fold higher Zn uptake of shoots compare with uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“field pea (Pisum sativum L. variety VL Matar 42)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 118–166 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose PGERs17 with Rhizobium as a bioinoculant for pea at cold temperatures.

Taxon
field peae0
Treatment
cold tolerant Pseudomonas sp. strain PGERs17e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain PGERs17Pseudomonas sp.e0symbiont
Second interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1e0symbiont
Outcome
can be employed as a bioinoculante0
Qualifier
cold temperature conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cold tolerant Pseudomonas sp. strain PGERs17 can be employed as a bioinoculant along with Rhizobium leguminosarum-PR1 to enhance plant growth, iron acquisition and nutrient uptake of field pea enhance plant growth, iron acquisition and nutrient uptake of field pea seedlings at cold temperature conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1270 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Rhizobium · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

55 papers: 45 positive, 10 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 12 positive, 4 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 37 positive, 3 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 72 positive, 17 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.