Paper · 2016 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Effect of wheat cultivars, fertilizers, and fungicides on Fusarium foot rot disease of wheat

Davut Soner AKGÜL; Ali ERKILIÇ

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Fusarium culmorum is a principal causal agent of root, crown, and foot rot disease in the wheat-growing areas of Turkey. The effects of different fertilization practices, fungicide sprays, and cultivar reactions of 12 wheat varieties were investigated for disease development in greenhouse conditions in 2006-2007. The fertilizers used in the experiments significantly reduced disease by 27.5%-54.7% compared to the nonfertilized control. The plants fertilized with calcium ammonium nitrate (26% N) or composite NPK (15%, 15%, 15%) showed fewer disease symptoms than those fertilized with NPK (20%, 20%, 0%) in the presowing applications. On the other hand, foot rot severity was lower with ammonium nitrate (33% N) than urea (46% N) when applied as a supplement in the 25th and 45th growth stages of the Zadoks scale. Furthermore, fungicide sprays and seed dressing treatments also decreased foot rot symptoms. Seed treatment with tebuconazole lowered disease severity in the subcrown internode compared to the control and it was overall the most effective fungicide with 47.8% efficacy. When plants were sprayed with fluquinconazole, tebuconazole, or epoxyconazole + carbendazim (two times at Zadoks growth stages 31 and 45), disease severity decreased by 96.3%, 93.9%, and 91.0%, respectively. In the cultivar reaction tests, no stable or considerable tolerance was observed in the 12 wheat varieties against foot rot. It may be concluded from this study that fertilizer forms and fungicide preference can play an important role where Fusarium foot rot is the main problem in wheat-growing areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers reduced disease by 27.5%-54.7% relative to no fertilizer.

Treatment
fertilizerse0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27.5%-54.7%e0
Comparator
nonfertilized controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fertilizers used in the experiments significantly reduced disease by 27.5%-54.7% compared to the nonfertilized control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–438 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium ammonium nitrate produced fewer symptoms than NPK (20%, 20%, 0%).

Treatment
calcium ammonium nitrate (26% N)e0
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
NPK (20%, 20%, 0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants fertilized with calcium ammonium nitrate (26% N) or composite NPK (15%, 15%, 15%) showed fewer disease symptoms than those fertilized with NPK (20%, 20%, 0%) in the presowing applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Composite NPK produced fewer symptoms than NPK (20%, 20%, 0%).

Treatment
composite NPK (15%, 15%, 15%)e0
Outcome
disease symptomse0
Direction
fewere0
Comparator
NPK (20%, 20%, 0%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The plants fertilized with calcium ammonium nitrate (26% N) or composite NPK (15%, 15%, 15%) showed fewer disease symptoms than those fertilized with NPK (20%, 20%, 0%) in the presowing applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate gave lower foot rot severity than urea at stages 25 and 45.

Organ / stage
25th and 45th growth stagese0
Treatment
ammonium nitrate (33% N)e0
Outcome
foot rot severitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
urea (46% N)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foot rot severity was lower with ammonium nitrate (33% N) than urea (46% N) when applied as a supplement in the 25th and 45th growth stages of the Zadoks scale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide sprays decreased foot rot symptoms.

Treatment
fungicide sprayse0
Outcome
foot rot symptomse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide sprays and seed dressing treatments also decreased foot rot symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed dressing decreased foot rot symptoms.

Treatment
seed dressing treatmentse0
Outcome
foot rot symptomse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fungicide sprays and seed dressing treatments also decreased foot rot symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole seed treatment lowered subcrown disease severity and had 47.8% efficacy.

Organ / stage
subcrown internodee0
Treatment
Seed treatment with tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
47.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with tebuconazole lowered disease severity in the subcrown internode compared to the control and it was overall the most effective fungicide with 47.8% efficacy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluquinconazole sprays decreased severity by 96.3%.

Treatment
fluquinconazolee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
96.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sprayed with fluquinconazole, tebuconazole, or epoxyconazole + carbendazim (two times at Zadoks growth stages 31 and 45), disease severity decreased by 96.3%, 93.9%, and 91.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole sprays decreased severity by 93.9%.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
93.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sprayed with fluquinconazole, tebuconazole, or epoxyconazole + carbendazim (two times at Zadoks growth stages 31 and 45), disease severity decreased by 96.3%, 93.9%, and 91.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Epoxyconazole plus carbendazim sprays decreased severity by 91.0%.

Treatment
epoxyconazole + carbendazime0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
91.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sprayed with fluquinconazole, tebuconazole, or epoxyconazole + carbendazim (two times at Zadoks growth stages 31 and 45), disease severity decreased by 96.3%, 93.9%, and 91.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No stable or considerable foot rot tolerance was found among 12 wheat varieties.

Outcome
tolerancee0
Value
12 wheat varietiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no stable or considerable tolerance was observed in the 12 wheat varieties against foot rot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1420 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fluquinconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium nitrate · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fungicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

157 papers: 135 positive, 22 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

153 papers more in this group

See all 157 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.