Paper · 1958 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Chemical Control Studies of the Wheat Curl Mite1

Edmon J. Kantack; Herbert Knutson

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Little work has been reported on the control of eriophyid mites with synthetic organic acaricides, and virtually none on the wheat curl mite, Aceria tulipae (Keif.). Rolling of the leaves caused by this species and the tendency for some mites to occur deep in the leaf sheaths between two surfaces protects them from sprays and suggested the translocation of systemic insecticides as the most promising means of control. Spraying with 30 different insecticides in greenhouse and field in the spring resulted in none that gave both high initial and long residual control. Eighty to 90% control was obtained at 2 to 3 days in the field with several insecticides but none exceeded 90% control. Best control at 5 weeks following spraying of young wheat in the fall was obtained with endrin in light mineral seal oil. After determining the maximum concentration of each systemic toxicant that was not highly detrimental to germination, three concentrations of each toxicant were tested. Retardation and/or reduction in germination resulted from the use of all seed treatments, although not above the 5% confidence limit in most cases when the toxicant did not exceed 0.125 pound per bushel. Impregnation of the toxicant in 4 pounds of Carhowax-6000 per bushel of seed, gave better control than soil drenches. Am. Cyanamid 12009 (95% control) and 12008 (85% control) at an average from 0.125 to 0.5 pound of toxicant in 4 pounds of Carbowax per bushel of seed, gave the best overall results at the end of 1 week. When these toxicants were impregnated in attac1ay at 1.0 pound toxicant per bushel, 89 and 74% control, respectively, was obtained at 1 week and 98 and 97%, respectively, at the end of 5 weeks. In field studies on plantings of fall-treated seed, best results, using Am. Cyanamid 12008 (89% control) and 12009 (72% control), were recorded at 5 weeks when the toxicant was used without being impregnated in granules. Mites were present in all cases when counts were made 10 weeks following planting as well as during the following spring. In no instance was control of wheat-streak mosaic obtained from seed treatments in 1954 when viruliferous mites were constantly introduced in large numbers onto the young wheat plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring insecticide sprays did not provide both high initial and persistent wheat curl mite control.

Treatment
30 different insecticidese0
Outcome
high initial and long residual controle0
Setting
greenhouse and fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with 30 different insecticides in greenhouse and field in the spring resulted in none that gave both high initial and long residual control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–570 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Several field sprays achieved eighty to 90% mite control after 2 to 3 days, but none exceeded 90%.

Outcome
controle0
Value
Eighty to 90%e0
Qualifier
at 2 to 3 dayse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighty to 90% control was obtained at 2 to 3 days in the field with several insecticides but none exceeded 90% control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–690 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endrin in light mineral seal oil gave the best control five weeks after fall spraying of young wheat.

Treatment
endrin in light mineral seal oile0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
Beste0
Qualifier
at 5 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Best control at 5 weeks following spraying of young wheat in the fall was obtained with endrin in light mineral seal oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments retarded or reduced wheat germination, mostly without statistical significance at toxicant doses up to 0.125 pound per bushel.

Treatment
all seed treatmentse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
Retardation and/or reductione0
Qualifier
when the toxicant did not exceed 0.125 pound per bushele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Retardation and/or reduction in germination resulted from the use of all seed treatments, although not above the 5% confidence limit in most cases when the toxicant did not exceed 0.125 pound per bushel.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Toxicant impregnated in Carhowax-6000 controlled mites better than soil drenches.

Treatment
Impregnation of the toxicant in 4 pounds of Carhowax-6000 per bushel of seede0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
soil drenchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Impregnation of the toxicant in 4 pounds of Carhowax-6000 per bushel of seed, gave better control than soil drenches.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Am. Cyanamid 12009 gave 95% mite control after one week.

Treatment
Am. Cyanamid 12009e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
at the end of 1 weeke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Am. Cyanamid 12009 (95% control) and 12008 (85% control) at an average from 0.125 to 0.5 pound of toxicant in 4 pounds of Carbowax per bushel of seed, gave the best overall results at the end of 1 week.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Am. Cyanamid 12008 gave 85% mite control after one week.

Treatment
12008e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
85%e0
Qualifier
at the end of 1 weeke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Am. Cyanamid 12009 (95% control) and 12008 (85% control) at an average from 0.125 to 0.5 pound of toxicant in 4 pounds of Carbowax per bushel of seed, gave the best overall results at the end of 1 week.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Attac1ay impregnation of the first toxicant yielded 89% control at one week and 98% at five weeks.

Outcome
controle0
Value
89 and 74%e0
Qualifier
at 1 weeke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When these toxicants were impregnated in attac1ay at 1.0 pound toxicant per bushel, 89 and 74% control, respectively, was obtained at 1 week and 98 and 97%, respectively, at the end of 5 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1507–1700 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application of Am. Cyanamid 12008 without granules gave 89% mite control at five weeks.

Treatment
Am. Cyanamid 12008e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
89%e0
Qualifier
at 5 weekse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field studies on plantings of fall-treated seed, best results, using Am. Cyanamid 12008 (89% control) and 12009 (72% control), were recorded at 5 weeks when the toxicant was used without being impregnated in granules.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field application of Am. Cyanamid 12009 without granules gave 72% mite control at five weeks.

Treatment
12009e0
Outcome
controle0
Value
72%e0
Qualifier
at 5 weekse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field studies on plantings of fall-treated seed, best results, using Am. Cyanamid 12008 (89% control) and 12009 (72% control), were recorded at 5 weeks when the toxicant was used without being impregnated in granules.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1701–1921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mites remained present ten weeks after planting and in the following spring.

Outcome
Mites were presente0
Qualifier
10 weeks following plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mites were present in all cases when counts were made 10 weeks following planting as well as during the following spring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2043 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments did not control wheat-streak mosaic when viruliferous mites were repeatedly introduced.

Treatment
seed treatmentse0
Outcome
control of wheat-streak mosaice0
Direction
no instancee0
Qualifier
when viruliferous mites were constantly introducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In no instance was control of wheat-streak mosaic obtained from seed treatments in 1954 when viruliferous mites were constantly introduced in large numbers onto the young wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2228 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

293 papers: 259 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 259 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

289 papers more in this group

See all 293 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.