Paper · 2004 · Journal of Phytopathology

The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fusarium Head Blight Development and Deoxynivalenol Contamination in Wheat

M. Lemmens; K. Haim; H. Lew; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
150
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The impact of nitrogen (N) fertilization on the development of Fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat and the resulting deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination in the kernels was studied. In a first experiment, the disease was assessed on two locations under natural infection pressure. Five different types of nitrogen fertilizer (both organic and mineral) were investigated, each applied at five input rates from 0 to 160 kg N/ha. With all fertilizers, a significant increase of disease intensity was observed with increasing N input, while the type of N fertilizer had poor or no effects on FHB. Depending on the fertilizer used, the percentage of diseased spikelets increased from 2.2% at zero N rate up to 6.6% at 160 kg N input per hectare. In a second series of trials, three spring wheat varieties including one Durum wheat line were artificially inoculated with a Fusarium graminearum and a F. culmorum strain, known producers of DON. A mineral N fertilizer was applied at five input levels from 0 to 160 kg N/ha. A significant increase in FHB intensity and DON contamination in the grain was observed with increasing N from 0 to 80 kg/ha. At higher input rates, relevant in contemporary crop husbandry, disease intensity and toxin contamination remained at constant levels. It is concluded that adaptation of N fertilization represents no relevant tool in managing FHB in practical wheat cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium head blight intensity increased significantly as nitrogen input rose across all fertilizers.

Treatment
increasing N inpute0
Interactor
FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease intensitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With all fertilizers, a significant increase of disease intensity was observed with increasing N input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–536 · show in text ↑
t0

“The Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization on Fusarium Head Blight Development and Deoxynivalenol Contamination in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer type had little or no effect on Fusarium head blight.

Treatment
type of N fertilizere0
Outcome
FHBe0
Direction
poor or no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the type of N fertilizer had poor or no effects on FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diseased spikelets increased from 2.2% at zero nitrogen to 6.6% at 160 kg N/ha.

Treatment
160 kg N input per hectaree0
Outcome
percentage of diseased spikeletse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.6%e0
Qualifier
2.2% at zero N ratee0
Comparator
zero N ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of diseased spikelets increased from 2.2% at zero N rate up to 6.6% at 160 kg N input per hectare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium head blight intensity increased significantly as nitrogen rose from 0 to 80 kg/ha in inoculated wheat.

Treatment
increasing N from 0 to 80 kg/hae0
Outcome
FHB intensitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in FHB intensity and DON contamination in the grain was observed with increasing N from 0 to 80 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain DON contamination increased significantly as nitrogen rose from 0 to 80 kg/ha.

Treatment
increasing N from 0 to 80 kg/hae0
Outcome
DON contamination in the graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant increase in FHB intensity and DON contamination in the grain was observed with increasing N from 0 to 80 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disease intensity and toxin contamination remained constant at higher nitrogen rates.

Treatment
higher input ratese0
Outcome
disease intensity and toxin contaminatione0
Direction
remained at constant levelse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At higher input rates, relevant in contemporary crop husbandry, disease intensity and toxin contamination remained at constant levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–114 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude nitrogen adjustment is not a relevant Fusarium head blight management tool.

Outcome
no relevant tool in managing FHBe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adaptation of N fertilization represents no relevant tool in managing FHB in practical wheat cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1410 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 72 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

nitrogen · Fusarium · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.