Paper · 1970 · Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of seed treatment and foliar spray with fungicides in controlling black point disease of wheat

PK Malaker; IH Mian

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The efficacy of seed treatment and foliar spray with fungicides in controlling black point incidence of wheat seeds was evaluated in the field. Two seed treating fungicides, namely Vitavax-200 and Homai-80WP were used @ 0.25% of dry seed weight and foliar spray with Tilt-250EC (0.05%) was applied in six different schedules. Untreated and unsprayed controls were also maintained. Seed treatment with either Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP significantly increased plant population and grain yield, but none of them was found effective in reducing black point incidence. On the other hand, foliar sprays with Tilt-250EC under all the spray schedules except spraying at 70 and 90 DAS significantly minimized the disease severity over unsprayed control. Among the different spray schedules, spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 DAS appeared to be most effective, which was similar to spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS in reducing black point incidence and increasing grain yield. Economic analysis on yield advantage showed that the highest additional gross margin of Tk. 6120/ha with BCR 2.57 was obtained from five sprays applied at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS. Key Words: Seed treatment, foliar spray, black point, wheat. DOI: 10.3329/bjar.v34i3.3968 Bangladesh J. Agril. Res. 34(3) : 425-434, September 2009

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP significantly increased wheat plant population and grain yield compared with untreated controls.

Treatment
Seed treatment with either Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WPe1
Outcome
plant population and grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
Untreated and unsprayed controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed treatment with either Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP significantly increased plant population and grain yield, but none of them was found effective in reducing black point incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–562 · show in text ↑
e2

“Untreated and unsprayed controls were also maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP did not reduce wheat black point incidence compared with untreated controls.

Treatment
Seed treatment with either Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WPe1
Outcome
black point incidencee1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
Untreated and unsprayed controlse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seed treatment with either Vitavax-200 or Homai-80WP significantly increased plant population and grain yield, but none of them was found effective in reducing black point incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–562 · show in text ↑
e2

“Untreated and unsprayed controls were also maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar sprays with Tilt-250EC significantly minimized wheat disease severity compared with unsprayed control, except for sprays at 70 and 90 DAS.

Treatment
foliar sprays with Tilt-250ECe3
Outcome
disease severitye3
Direction
minimizede3
Qualifier
except spraying at 70 and 90 DASe3
Comparator
unsprayed controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“foliar sprays with Tilt-250EC under all the spray schedules except spraying at 70 and 90 DAS significantly minimized the disease severity over unsprayed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 DAS was the most effective schedule for reducing wheat black point incidence, similar to spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 DAS.

Treatment
spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 DASe4
Outcome
black point incidencee4
Direction
reducinge4
Qualifier
most effectivee4
Comparator
spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DASe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Among the different spray schedules, spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 DAS appeared to be most effective, which was similar to spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS in reducing black point incidence and increasing grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 DAS was the most effective schedule for increasing wheat grain yield, similar to spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 DAS.

Treatment
spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 DASe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
increasinge4
Qualifier
most effectivee4
Comparator
spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DASe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Among the different spray schedules, spraying at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 DAS appeared to be most effective, which was similar to spraying at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS in reducing black point incidence and increasing grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five sprays at 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 DAS gave the highest additional gross margin of Tk. 6120/ha in wheat.

Treatment
five sprays applied at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DASe5
Outcome
additional gross margine5
Direction
higheste5
Value
Tk. 6120/hae5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“Economic analysis on yield advantage showed that the highest additional gross margin of Tk. 6120/ha with BCR 2.57 was obtained from five sprays applied at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit-cost ratio of the five-spray schedule was 2.57.

Treatment
five sprays applied at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DASe5
Outcome
BCRe5
Value
2.57e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“controlling black point disease of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“Economic analysis on yield advantage showed that the highest additional gross margin of Tk. 6120/ha with BCR 2.57 was obtained from five sprays applied at 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1163 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 29 positive, 6 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

application · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 83 positive, 17 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.