Paper · 2025 · Food Chemistry X

Biopolymer-based active packaging with TiO₂ and nano-encapsulated essential oils improves postharvest stability of fresh-cut kale

Faezeh Mirzajani; Raheleh Ebrahimi; Weria Weisany; et al.

9
claims
36
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fresh-cut kale ( Brassica oleracea ) is highly perishable due to dehydration, enzymatic browning, membrane damage, and microbial spoilage. This study developed an active packaging system using chitosan-based nanocomposite films containing titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles and nanoencapsulated essential oils (EO-NCs) from Thymus daenensis Celak and Bunium persicum . The nanomaterials were synthesized, characterized (SEM, DLS, FTIR, XRD, UV–Vis), and incorporated into absorbent pads for kale storage at 4 °C over 40 days. The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %), improved chlorophyll retention (∼30–35 %), and preserved membrane integrity (>40 % at day 40). It also maintained phenolics (3.2–3.4 mg GAE/g vs. ∼2.0 in controls), ascorbic acid, and protein (∼25–30 % higher). EO-NCs showed strong antioxidant activity, inhibiting PPO and POD to reduce browning. Mineral retention was enhanced (Mn and Fe ∼20–25 % higher), while microbial growth was suppressed. Overall, TiO₂ and EO-NCs synergistically improved postharvest stability, demonstrating a sustainable strategy for extending shelf life of fresh-cut vegetables. • Chitosan–EO-NC–TiO₂ nanocomposite films extended kale shelf life by 30–40 days. • Active films reduced browning, water loss, and microbial spoilage during storage. • EO-NCs enabled controlled release of antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds. • TiO₂ nanoparticles enhanced film stability and contributed photocatalytic defense. • Bioactive packaging preserved chlorophyll, phenolics, and vitamin C in kale leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging reduced kale weight loss by about 45–55%.

Treatment
packaginge0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
∼45–55 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging improved chlorophyll retention by about 30–35%.

Treatment
packaginge1
Outcome
chlorophyll retentione0
Direction
improvede0
Value
∼30–35 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved chlorophyll retention (∼30–35 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging preserved membrane integrity above 40% at day 40.

Treatment
packaginge1
Outcome
membrane integritye0
Direction
preservede0
Value
>40 %e0
Qualifier
day 40e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preserved membrane integrity (>40 % at day 40)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging maintained phenolics at 3.2–3.4 mg GAE/g versus about 2.0 in controls.

Treatment
packaginge1
Outcome
phenolicse0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
3.2–3.4 mg GAE/ge0
Qualifier
∼2.0e0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintained phenolics (3.2–3.4 mg GAE/g vs. ∼2.0 in controls)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging maintained ascorbic acid and protein about 25–30% higher.

Treatment
packaginge1
Outcome
ascorbic acid, and proteine0
Direction
highere0
Value
∼25–30 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid, and protein (∼25–30 % higher)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EO-NCs inhibited PPO and POD and reduced browning.

Treatment
EO-NCse0
Gene
PPO and PODe0
Outcome
browninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EO-NCs showed strong antioxidant activity, inhibiting PPO and POD to reduce browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging increased Mn and Fe retention by about 20–25%.

Treatment
packaginge1
Outcome
Mn and Fee0
Direction
highere0
Value
∼20–25 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral retention was enhanced (Mn and Fe ∼20–25 % higher)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaging suppressed microbial growth.

Treatment
packaginge1
Outcome
microbial growthe0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while microbial growth was suppressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanocomposite films extended kale shelf life by 30–40 days.

Treatment
Chitosan–EO-NC–TiO₂ nanocomposite filmse0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
extendede0
Value
30–40 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitosan–EO-NC–TiO₂ nanocomposite films extended kale shelf life by 30–40 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
t1

“kale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The packaging significantly reduced weight loss (∼45–55 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–587 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: protein · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

storage · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

storage · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.