Abstract
The present investigation was conducted at the Vegetable Research Farm, Department of Horticulture, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences (SHUATS), Prayagraj (U.P.), during the Rabi season of the year 2020–21. The experiment was laid out in a randomised block design with three replications and 15 treatments. T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching)+ Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles & T13 N P K (RDF) + Biocapsule 500 ppm (soil drenching) + foliar application of ZnO and FeOnano particles was found to be the best in Plant height, leaf area, and no of leaves. Again In terms of yield parameters, the treatment T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles performed best in Head diameter (cm), Marketable Head Yield/plot (kg), Marketable Head Yield/hectare (q/ha), Harvest Index (%) (18.68 cm, 3.15 kg, 212.86 qh, 90.65%).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
T15 and T13 were best for plant height, leaf area, and leaf number.
- Taxon
- Broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicat0 - Treatment
- T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching)+ Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles & T13 N P K (RDF) + Biocapsule 500 ppm (soil drenching) + foliar application of ZnO and FeOnano particlese0
- Outcome
- Plant height, leaf area, and no of leavese0
- Direction
- beste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var Italica)”
e0“T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching)+ Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles & T13 N P K (RDF) + Biocapsule 500 ppm (soil drenching) + foliar application of ZnO and FeOnano particles was found to be the best in Plant height, leaf area, and no of leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
T15 had the best head diameter at 18.68 cm.
- Taxon
- Broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicat0 - Treatment
- T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particlese0
- Outcome
- Head diametere0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 18.68 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var Italica)”
e0“the treatment T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles performed best in Head diameter (cm), Marketable Head Yield/plot (kg), Marketable Head Yield/hectare (q/ha), Harvest Index (%) (18.68 cm, 3.15 kg, 212.86 qh, 90.65%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T15 had the best marketable head yield per plot at 3.15 kg.
- Taxon
- Broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicat0 - Treatment
- T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particlese0
- Outcome
- Marketable Head Yield/plote0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 3.15 kge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var Italica)”
e0“the treatment T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles performed best in Head diameter (cm), Marketable Head Yield/plot (kg), Marketable Head Yield/hectare (q/ha), Harvest Index (%) (18.68 cm, 3.15 kg, 212.86 qh, 90.65%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T15 had the best marketable head yield per hectare at 212.86 qh.
- Taxon
- Broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicat0 - Treatment
- T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particlese0
- Outcome
- Marketable Head Yield/hectaree0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 212.86 qhe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var Italica)”
e0“the treatment T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles performed best in Head diameter (cm), Marketable Head Yield/plot (kg), Marketable Head Yield/hectare (q/ha), Harvest Index (%) (18.68 cm, 3.15 kg, 212.86 qh, 90.65%)”
Claim · model-written summary
T15 had the best harvest index at 90.65%.
- Taxon
- Broccoli
Brassica oleracea var. italicat0 - Treatment
- T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particlese0
- Outcome
- Harvest Indexe0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 90.65%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var Italica)”
e0“the treatment T15 N P K (RDF) + Nanozeolite 50 ppm (Soil drenching) + Biocapsule 500 ppm+ folia application of ZnO and FeO nano particles performed best in Head diameter (cm), Marketable Head Yield/plot (kg), Marketable Head Yield/hectare (q/ha), Harvest Index (%) (18.68 cm, 3.15 kg, 212.86 qh, 90.65%)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc oxide · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →application · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →fertilization · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →application · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →application · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
106 papers more in this group
See all 110 papers →fertilization · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
239 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
260 papers more in this group
See all 264 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.