Paper · 1993 · Journal of Food Science

Modified Atmosphere Packaging Affects Ascorbic Acid, Enzyme Activity and Market Quality of Broccoli

M. M. BARTH; E. L. KERBEL; A. K. PERRY; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
121
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Reduced ascorbic acid (RAA) content, total chlorophyll and green color retention, enzyme activities and texture changes were followed in broccoli spears packaged in polymeric film and nonpackaged during 96 hr storage (10°C). Concentrations within packages monitored by gas chromatography were (CO 2 ,) 8% and (0 2 ) 10%. RAA retention, moisture content, total chlorophyll and color retention were greater in packaged broccoli. No differences were found between packaged and nonpackaged broccoli for ascorbate oxidase and peroxidase activities, or texture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaged broccoli retained more reduced ascorbic acid than nonpackaged broccoli.

Treatment
packaged in polymeric filme1
Outcome
RAA retentione0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
96 hr storage (10°C)e1
Comparator
nonpackagede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RAA retention, moisture content, total chlorophyll and color retention were greater in packaged broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli spears packaged in polymeric film and nonpackaged during 96 hr storage (10°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaged broccoli had greater moisture content than nonpackaged broccoli.

Treatment
packaged in polymeric filme1
Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nonpackagede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RAA retention, moisture content, total chlorophyll and color retention were greater in packaged broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli spears packaged in polymeric film and nonpackaged during 96 hr storage (10°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaged broccoli retained more total chlorophyll than nonpackaged broccoli.

Treatment
packaged in polymeric filme1
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nonpackagede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RAA retention, moisture content, total chlorophyll and color retention were greater in packaged broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli spears packaged in polymeric film and nonpackaged during 96 hr storage (10°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Packaged broccoli retained more green color than nonpackaged broccoli.

Treatment
packaged in polymeric filme1
Outcome
color retentione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
nonpackagede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RAA retention, moisture content, total chlorophyll and color retention were greater in packaged broccoli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli spears packaged in polymeric film and nonpackaged during 96 hr storage (10°C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate oxidase and peroxidase activities did not differ between packaged and nonpackaged broccoli.

Treatment
packagede0
Outcome
ascorbate oxidase and peroxidase activitiese0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
nonpackagede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were found between packaged and nonpackaged broccoli for ascorbate oxidase and peroxidase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Texture did not differ between packaged and nonpackaged broccoli.

Treatment
packagede0
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
No differencese0
Comparator
nonpackagede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No differences were found between packaged and nonpackaged broccoli for ascorbate oxidase and peroxidase activities, or texture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–563 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: grain · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

storage · physiology: pigments · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.