Paper · 2019 · Journal of Food Processing and Preservation

Physiological, qualitative, and microbiological changes of minimally processed Brussels sprouts in response to coating with carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax emulsion

Dariusz Kowalczyk; Monika Kordowska‐Wiater; Klaudia Kałwa; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Minimally processed Brussels sprouts were coated which carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax emulsion, packed in boxes with perforated wrap, and stored at 8°C. It was found that the emulsion not only was deposited on the surface but also penetrated into the inside of the heads through vascular system in stems and leaves. The coating did not affect weight loss, moisture content, and texture of the vegetables. In turn, reduced respiration rate, accelerated chlorophyll degradation, and increased activity of polyphenol oxidase was noticed in the coated Brussels sprouts. Consequently, the coating decreased the sensory quality of the vegetables. Furthermore, the coating favored fungal growth in the artificially contaminated Brussels sprouts. The changes in the vegetables were likely due to excessively decreased gas exchange performance, including ethylene accumulation. Practical applications Edible coatings are a particular form of packaging directly applied to the surface of perishables. It is widely believed that coating treatment enhances the quality of fruits and vegetables, protecting them from postharvest decay. Nevertheless, not all coatings will work well on a specific horticultural crops nor will all horticultural crops have the same needs. Consequently, when the coating material is not adequately selected, edible coatings can cause anaerobic respiration by acting as a barrier for the gas exchange between fresh produce and the surroundings. Since the coatings can be produced from various edible biomolecules, selecting a proper coating is quite problematic. In this context, the presented work shows that carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax-based coating is not suitable for the minimally processed Brussels sprouts. The results reported here could help other scientists adjust their research plans and increase their chances of success in extending postharvest shelf-life of Brussels sprouts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax emulsion was deposited on the surface and also penetrated into the heads through the vascular system in stems and leaves.

Treatment
emulsione0
Outcome
penetrated into the inside of the heads through vascular system in stems and leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the emulsion not only was deposited on the surface but also penetrated into the inside of the heads through vascular system in stems and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–322 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating did not affect weight loss, moisture content or texture of minimally processed Brussels sprouts.

Treatment
coatinge0
Outcome
weight loss, moisture content, and texturee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The coating did not affect weight loss, moisture content, and texture of the vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Brussels sprouts showed reduced respiration rate.

Treatment
coatede0
Outcome
respiration ratee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced respiration rate, accelerated chlorophyll degradation, and increased activity of polyphenol oxidase was noticed in the coated Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Brussels sprouts showed accelerated chlorophyll degradation.

Treatment
coatede0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradatione0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced respiration rate, accelerated chlorophyll degradation, and increased activity of polyphenol oxidase was noticed in the coated Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated Brussels sprouts showed increased polyphenol oxidase activity.

Treatment
coatede0
Gene
polyphenol oxidasee0
Outcome
activity of polyphenol oxidasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced respiration rate, accelerated chlorophyll degradation, and increased activity of polyphenol oxidase was noticed in the coated Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating decreased the sensory quality of the vegetables.

Treatment
coatinge0
Outcome
sensory qualitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the coating decreased the sensory quality of the vegetables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating favored fungal growth in artificially contaminated Brussels sprouts.

Treatment
coatinge0
Outcome
fungal growthe0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“the coating favored fungal growth in the artificially contaminated Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–745 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The changes were likely due to excessively decreased gas exchange performance, including ethylene accumulation.

Compound
ethylenee0
Outcome
The changes in the vegetablese0
Qualifier
excessively decreased gas exchange performancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“The changes in the vegetables were likely due to excessively decreased gas exchange performance, including ethylene accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–875 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax coating is not suitable for minimally processed Brussels sprouts.

Treatment
carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax-based coatinge0
Outcome
not suitablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera
Brassica oleracea var. gemmifera · TaxonEric Hunt · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 · show in text ↑
e0

“carboxymethyl cellulose/candelilla wax-based coating is not suitable for the minimally processed Brussels sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1747 · show in text ↑

storage · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

storage · quality: general · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 43 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.