Paper · 2025 · Microorganisms

Short-Term Application of Alfalfa Green Manure Increases Maize Yield and Soil Fertility While Altering Microbial Communities in Karst Yellow Clay Soil

Xiaoye Gao; Shimei Yang; Yan He; et al.

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Green manure effectively improves soil nutrients and crop yields, yet its partial substitution for chemical nitrogen fertilizer (CF) in maize systems remains underexplored in ecologically fragile Karst landscapes. To assess the effect of alfalfa green manure on maize yield, soil nutrients, enzymes, and microorganisms, we conducted a two-year field experiment comprising eight treatments: four CF levels (100%, 80%, 60%, and 0% of recommended CF) applied alone or combined with alfalfa green manure (CF100, AL_CF100, CF80, AL_CF80, CF60, AL_CF60, CF0, AL_CF0). The results showed that maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer. Compared to the CF100 treatment, the AL_CF100 and AL_CF80 treatments significantly increased grain yield by an average of 21.8% and 16.9%, respectively. Additionally, the AL_CF60 treatment maintained maize grain yield in 2020 and significantly increased it in 2021. The AL_CF100 treatment significantly enhanced soil available N (AN) content, while soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI) were significantly improved in the AL_CF100, AL_CF80, and AL_CF60 treatments. Alfalfa green manure application had no significant effect on soil bacterial and fungal communities. However, the CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of bacterial phyla (Bacteroidota, Myxococcota, and Patescibacteria) and genera (Intrasporangium, Streptomyces, and Quadrisphaera), as well as fungal genera (Exophiala and Setophoma). α-Diversity analysis revealed that partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manure did not significantly affect soil bacterial diversity (Ace, Shannon, and Sobs indices) or richness (Chao value). In contrast, chemical N fertilizer rates significantly altered the β-diversity of both bacteria and fungi. The soil AN, AK, sucrase activity, and the relative abundances of Bacteroidota, Streptomyces, and Instrasporangium showed significant positive relationship with maize grain yield. This study demonstrates that substituting 20% CF with alfalfa green manure optimizes maize productivity while enhancing soil health in Karst agroecosystems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer decreased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
sole reduction of chemical N fertilizere0
Outcome
maize grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF100 significantly increased maize grain yield by 21.8% compared with CF100.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF100e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
21.8%e1
Comparator
CF100e1
Setting
two-year field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CF100 treatment, the AL_CF100 and AL_CF80 treatments significantly increased grain yield by an average of 21.8% and 16.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“we conducted a two-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF80 significantly increased maize grain yield by 16.9% compared with CF100.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF80e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
16.9%e1
Comparator
CF100e1
Setting
two-year field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the CF100 treatment, the AL_CF100 and AL_CF80 treatments significantly increased grain yield by an average of 21.8% and 16.9%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–815 · show in text ↑
e2

“we conducted a two-year field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF60 maintained maize grain yield in 2020.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF60e1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
maintainede1
Qualifier
in 2020e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“the AL_CF60 treatment maintained maize grain yield in 2020 and significantly increased it in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF60 significantly increased maize grain yield in 2021.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF60e1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in 2021e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“the AL_CF60 treatment maintained maize grain yield in 2020 and significantly increased it in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF100 significantly enhanced soil available N content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF100e1
Outcome
soil available N (AN) contente1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The AL_CF100 treatment significantly enhanced soil available N (AN) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1005 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF100 significantly improved soil Olsen-P content and soil quality index.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF100e1
Outcome
soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI)e1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI) were significantly improved in the AL_CF100, AL_CF80, and AL_CF60 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF80 significantly improved soil Olsen-P content and soil quality index.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF80e1
Outcome
soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI)e1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI) were significantly improved in the AL_CF100, AL_CF80, and AL_CF60 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AL_CF60 significantly improved soil Olsen-P content and soil quality index.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
AL_CF60e1
Outcome
soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI)e1
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil Olsen-P (SOP) content and soil quality index (SQI) were significantly improved in the AL_CF100, AL_CF80, and AL_CF60 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa green manure had no significant effect on soil bacterial and fungal communities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Alfalfa green manure applicatione1
Outcome
soil bacterial and fungal communitiese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“Alfalfa green manure application had no significant effect on soil bacterial and fungal communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1246 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of bacterial phyla Bacteroidota, Myxococcota and Patescibacteria.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
CF ratese1
Outcome
relative abundances of bacterial phylae1
Direction
positively influencede1
Qualifier
Bacteroidota, Myxococcota, and Patescibacteriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“the CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of bacterial phyla (Bacteroidota, Myxococcota, and Patescibacteria) and genera (Intrasporangium, Streptomyces, and Quadrisphaera), as well as fungal genera (Exophiala and Setophoma)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1497 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of bacterial genera Intrasporangium, Streptomyces and Quadrisphaera.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
CF ratese1
Outcome
relative abundancese1
Direction
positively influencede1
Qualifier
genera (Intrasporangium, Streptomyces, and Quadrisphaera)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“the CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of bacterial phyla (Bacteroidota, Myxococcota, and Patescibacteria) and genera (Intrasporangium, Streptomyces, and Quadrisphaera), as well as fungal genera (Exophiala and Setophoma)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1497 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of fungal genera Exophiala and Setophoma.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
CF ratese1
Outcome
relative abundancese1
Direction
positively influencede1
Qualifier
fungal genera (Exophiala and Setophoma)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“the CF rates positively influenced the relative abundances of bacterial phyla (Bacteroidota, Myxococcota, and Patescibacteria) and genera (Intrasporangium, Streptomyces, and Quadrisphaera), as well as fungal genera (Exophiala and Setophoma)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manure did not significantly affect soil bacterial diversity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manuree1
Outcome
soil bacterial diversity (Ace, Shannon, and Sobs indices)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manure did not significantly affect soil bacterial diversity (Ace, Shannon, and Sobs indices) or richness (Chao value)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manure did not significantly affect soil bacterial richness (Chao value).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manuree1
Outcome
richness (Chao value)e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“partial substitution of CF with alfalfa green manure did not significantly affect soil bacterial diversity (Ace, Shannon, and Sobs indices) or richness (Chao value)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1698 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical N fertilizer rates significantly altered the beta-diversity of both bacteria and fungi.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
chemical N fertilizer ratese1
Outcome
β-diversity of both bacteria and fungie1
Direction
alterede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“chemical N fertilizer rates significantly altered the β-diversity of both bacteria and fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1805 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil AN, AK and sucrase activity showed a significant positive relationship with maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Compound
soil AN, AKe1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
positivee1
Qualifier
sucrase activitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil AN, AK, sucrase activity, and the relative abundances of Bacteroidota, Streptomyces, and Instrasporangium showed significant positive relationship with maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative abundances of Bacteroidota, Streptomyces and Instrasporangium showed a significant positive relationship with maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
Bacteroidota, Streptomyces, and Instrasporangiume1symbiont
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
positivee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The soil AN, AK, sucrase activity, and the relative abundances of Bacteroidota, Streptomyces, and Instrasporangium showed significant positive relationship with maize grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1807–1985 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Substituting 20% CF with alfalfa green manure optimizes maize productivity while enhancing soil health (author conclusion).

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
substituting 20% CF with alfalfa green manuree1
Outcome
maize productivitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize grain yield decreased with the sole reduction of chemical N fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“substituting 20% CF with alfalfa green manure optimizes maize productivity while enhancing soil health”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2016–2118 · show in text ↑

Medicago sativa · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Medicago sativa · ecology: diversity · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · ecology: diversity · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 73 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

422 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,485 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.