Paper · 2023 · The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico

Efficacy of OMRI-certified fungicides and chitosan for managing early blight caused by Alternaria solani and Septoria leaf spot in tomato

Merari Feliciano-Rivera; Paul Vincelli

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Field studies to evaluate the efficacy of OMRI-certified fungicides and other materials for control of early blight caused by Alternaria solani and Septoria leaf spot of tomato were conducted in Lexington, Kentucky during 2009 and 2010. Nine fungicides as well as ammonium bicarbonate and chitosan were evaluated in an organic production system. The most effective fungicides for managing Septoria leaf spot and early blight of tomato were copper based. None of the biological-based products (Sonata® and Serenade Max®), plant-based extracts (Trilogy® and Regalia® SC), chitosan, ammonium bicarbonate nor horticultural lime sulfur provided a significant (P>0.05) reduction in disease severity. However, despite significant (P<0.05) disease control in plots treated with copper-based products, no significant (P>0.05) improvement in yield over the untreated control was observed during the first two experiments in which the initial symptoms of foliar disease were observed after fruits were set. In the third field trial, in which initial symptoms were observed before fruit set, Serenade Max®, Bordeaux mixture, Regalia® SC, water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfur improved yield, although none provided significant disease control. These results suggest that, when necrotrophic foliar disease develops after fruit set, fungicides may have no effect on yield. In addition, some OMRI-certified fungicides may improve tomato yields by unknown mechanisms that do not involve disease control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper-based fungicides were the most effective against Septoria leaf spot and early blight.

Treatment
copper basede0
Interactor
SeptoriaSeptoriae0pathogen
Outcome
Septoria leaf spot and early blighte0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Septoria
Septoria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Maccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective fungicides for managing Septoria leaf spot and early blight of tomato were copper based.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed biological products, extracts and other materials did not significantly reduce disease severity.

Treatment
biological-based products (Sonata® and Serenade Max®), plant-based extracts (Trilogy® and Regalia® SC), chitosan, ammonium bicarbonate nor horticultural lime sulfure0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
Nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the biological-based products (Sonata® and Serenade Max®), plant-based extracts (Trilogy® and Regalia® SC), chitosan, ammonium bicarbonate nor horticultural lime sulfur provided a significant (P>0.05) reduction in disease severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper-based products significantly controlled disease.

Treatment
copper-based productse0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
disease controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite significant (P<0.05) disease control in plots treated with copper-based products”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper-based products did not significantly improve yield in the first two experiments when symptoms appeared after fruit set.

Treatment
copper-based productse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no significant (P>0.05) improvemente0
Qualifier
after fruits were sete0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“despite significant (P<0.05) disease control in plots treated with copper-based products, no significant (P>0.05) improvement in yield over the untreated control was observed during the first two experiments in which the initial symptoms of foliar disease were observed after fruits were set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–994 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serenade Max improved yield in the third trial, with symptoms before fruit set.

Treatment
Serenade Max®e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
before fruit sete0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the third field trial, in which initial symptoms were observed before fruit set, Serenade Max®, Bordeaux mixture, Regalia® SC, water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfur improved yield, although none provided significant disease control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1232 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bordeaux mixture improved yield in the third trial.

Treatment
Bordeaux mixturee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bordeaux mixture, Regalia® SC, water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfur improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regalia SC improved yield in the third trial.

Treatment
Regalia® SCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regalia® SC, water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfur improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble chitosan improved yield in the third trial.

Treatment
water-soluble chitosane0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfur improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime sulfur improved yield in the third trial.

Treatment
lime sulfure0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lime sulfur improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The third-trial yield-improving treatments did not significantly control disease.

Treatment
Serenade Max®, Bordeaux mixture, Regalia® SC, water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfure0
Outcome
disease controle0
Direction
none providede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Serenade Max®, Bordeaux mixture, Regalia® SC, water-soluble chitosan and lime sulfur improved yield, although none provided significant disease control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest fungicides may have no yield effect when necrotrophic foliar disease appears after fruit set.

Treatment
fungicidese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
after fruit sete0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when necrotrophic foliar disease develops after fruit set, fungicides may have no effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1358 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest some certified fungicides may increase tomato yield through mechanisms other than disease control.

Treatment
OMRI-certified fungicidese0
Outcome
tomato yieldse0
Direction
improvee0
Qualifier
unknown mechanisms that do not involve disease controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some OMRI-certified fungicides may improve tomato yields by unknown mechanisms that do not involve disease control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1373–1487 · show in text ↑

chitosan · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

chitosan · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 38 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

chitosan · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

29 papers: 29 positive, 0 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

lime · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 17 positive, 6 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

lime · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 19 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.