Abstract
The effects of different sulphur (S) fertilisers (ammonium, sodium, potassium and calcium sulphates) in combination with nitrogen (N) on plant growth, yield and quality of fruits were investigated in two dwarf cultivars Proton and Ĺ ejk. Single N, applied as ammonium nitrate, stimulated growth of plants and significantly increased yield of fruits, but did not change content of lycopene as well as colour parameters (a*, b* and L*) and decreased significantly S content in fruits. All S fertilisers significantly increased S and lycopene content in fruits (up to 39% in cv. Ĺ ejk and 92% in cv. Proton) and positively influenced colour of tomato puree, namely parameter a*. The earlier cv. Ĺ ejk responded better to S supply than cv. Proton, which showed a negative yield effect esp. on variants where higher S doses were applied. Sodium sulphate undesirably significantly enhanced Na content of fruits in both cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Single nitrogen applied as ammonium nitrate significantly increased tomato fruit yield.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- fruitse1
- Treatment
- Single N, applied as ammonium nitratee1
- Outcome
- yield of fruitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“Single N, applied as ammonium nitrate, stimulated growth of plants and significantly increased yield of fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Single nitrogen applied as ammonium nitrate stimulated plant growth.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Single N, applied as ammonium nitratee1
- Outcome
- growth of plantse1
- Direction
- stimulatede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“Single N, applied as ammonium nitrate, stimulated growth of plants and significantly increased yield of fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Single nitrogen did not change the lycopene content of tomato fruit.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Single N, applied as ammonium nitratee1
- Outcome
- content of lycopenee2
- Direction
- did not changee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“Single N, applied as ammonium nitrate, stimulated growth of plants and significantly increased yield of fruits”
e2“did not change content of lycopene”
Claim · model-written summary
Single nitrogen significantly decreased the sulphur content of tomato fruit.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- fruitse3
- Treatment
- Single N, applied as ammonium nitratee1
- Outcome
- S content in fruitse3
- Direction
- decreasede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“Single N, applied as ammonium nitrate, stimulated growth of plants and significantly increased yield of fruits”
e3“decreased significantly S content in fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
All sulphur fertilisers significantly increased sulphur and lycopene content of tomato fruit.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- fruitse1
- Treatment
- S fertiliserse1
- Outcome
- S and lycopene content in fruitse1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“All S fertilisers significantly increased S and lycopene content in fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur fertilisers increased lycopene content of tomato cv. Lejk fruit by up to 39%.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Ĺ ejke2
- Organ / stage
- fruitse1
- Treatment
- S fertiliserse1
- Outcome
- lycopene contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 39%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“All S fertilisers significantly increased S and lycopene content in fruits”
e2“up to 39% in cv. Ĺ ejk and 92% in cv. Proton”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur fertilisers increased lycopene content of tomato cv. Proton fruit by up to 92%.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Protone2
- Organ / stage
- fruitse1
- Treatment
- S fertiliserse1
- Outcome
- lycopene contente1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 92%e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“All S fertilisers significantly increased S and lycopene content in fruits”
e2“up to 39% in cv. Ĺ ejk and 92% in cv. Proton”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Lejk responded better to sulphur supply than cultivar Proton.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Ĺ ejke1
- Treatment
- S supplye1
- Outcome
- responded better to S supplye1
- Direction
- bettere1
- Comparator
- Protone1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“The earlier cv. Ĺ ejk responded better to S supply than cv. Proton”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Proton showed a negative yield effect where higher sulphur doses were applied.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Material
- Protone1
- Treatment
- higher S dosese2
- Outcome
- yielde2
- Direction
- negativee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“The earlier cv. Ĺ ejk responded better to S supply than cv. Proton”
e2“which showed a negative yield effect esp. on variants where higher S doses were applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Sodium sulphate significantly enhanced the sodium content of tomato fruit, which is undesirable.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- fruitse1
- Treatment
- Sodium sulphatee1
- Outcome
- Na content of fruitse1
- Direction
- enhancede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“Sodium sulphate undesirably significantly enhanced Na content of fruits in both cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur fertilisers positively influenced the colour of tomato puree, namely parameter a*.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- S fertiliserse1
- Outcome
- colour of tomato pureee2
- Direction
- positively influencede2
- Qualifier
- parameter a*e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“All S fertilisers significantly increased S and lycopene content in fruits”
e2“positively influenced colour of tomato puree, namely parameter a*”
Claim · model-written summary
Single nitrogen did not change the colour parameters of tomato puree.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Single N, applied as ammonium nitratee1
- Outcome
- colour parameters (a*, b* and L*)e2
- Direction
- did not changee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Tomato Fruits”
e1“Single N, applied as ammonium nitrate, stimulated growth of plants and significantly increased yield of fruits”
e2“did not change content of lycopene as well as colour parameters (a*, b* and L*)”
The same questions in other papers
ammonium nitrate · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
ammonium nitrate · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →sulfur atom · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
sulfur atom · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
fertilization · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
167 papers more in this group
See all 171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.