Abstract
In order to identify the resistance of tomato to late blight(Phytophthora infestans) induced by benzothiadiazole,lentinan,chitosan and amino-oligosaccharin,this study determined the bacteriostatic activity of the above 4 elicitors.The results showed that these 4 elicitors had no significant bactericidal activity,and their inhibitory effects were generally less than 30%. The results of pot experiment indicated that the effects of induced resistance of these 4 elicitors with different concentrations against tomato in seedling stage were good.Among them,2% chitosan(AS)at concentration of 500 mg·L-1 was 90.06%,which has the best control efficiency.The results of field experiment indicated that the effects of induced resistance of these 4 elicitors with different concentrations against tomato late blight in adult-plant stage were over 70%(except the treatment of 2% chitosan AS at concentration of 125 mg·L-1 ).The better treatments were 1% benzothiadiazole(EW) at concentration of 50 mg·L-1 and 3% amino-oligosaccharin AS at concentration of 100 mg·L-1 .Their control efficiencies were 94.71% and 95.89%,respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Benzothiadiazole had no significant bactericidal activity, with generally less than 30% inhibition.
- Treatment
- benzothiadiazolee0
- Outcome
- bactericidal activitye0
- Direction
- no significante0
- Value
- less than 30%e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“benzothiadiazole,lentinan,chitosan and amino-oligosaccharin,this study determined the bacteriostatic activity of the above 4 elicitors.The results showed that these 4 elicitors had no significant bactericidal activity,and their inhibitory effects were generally less than 30%”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentinan had no significant bactericidal activity, with generally less than 30% inhibition.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“benzothiadiazole,lentinan,chitosan and amino-oligosaccharin,this study determined the bacteriostatic activity of the above 4 elicitors.The results showed that these 4 elicitors had no significant bactericidal activity,and their inhibitory effects were generally less than 30%”
Claim · model-written summary
Chitosan had no significant bactericidal activity, with generally less than 30% inhibition.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“benzothiadiazole,lentinan,chitosan and amino-oligosaccharin,this study determined the bacteriostatic activity of the above 4 elicitors.The results showed that these 4 elicitors had no significant bactericidal activity,and their inhibitory effects were generally less than 30%”
Claim · model-written summary
Amino-oligosaccharin had no significant bactericidal activity, with generally less than 30% inhibition.
- Treatment
- amino-oligosaccharine0
- Outcome
- bactericidal activitye0
- Direction
- no significante0
- Value
- less than 30%e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“benzothiadiazole,lentinan,chitosan and amino-oligosaccharin,this study determined the bacteriostatic activity of the above 4 elicitors.The results showed that these 4 elicitors had no significant bactericidal activity,and their inhibitory effects were generally less than 30%”
Claim · model-written summary
Pot treatments induced good seedling resistance to late blight.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Organ / stage
- seedling stagee0
- Treatment
- these 4 elicitors with different concentrationse0
- Outcome
- induced resistancee0
- Direction
- goode0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of induced resistance of these 4 elicitors with different concentrations against tomato in seedling stage were good”
Claim · model-written summary
At 500 mg/L, 2% chitosan AS achieved best control efficiency of 90.06%.
- Treatment
- 2% chitosan(AS)at concentration of 500 mg·L-1e0
- Outcome
- control efficiencye0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 90.06%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“2% chitosan(AS)at concentration of 500 mg·L-1 was 90.06%,which has the best control efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Field elicitor treatments generally exceeded 70% control against adult tomato late blight except 2% chitosan at 125 mg/L.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- these 4 elicitors with different concentrationse0
- Outcome
- late blighte0
- Direction
- overe0
- Value
- over 70%e0
- Qualifier
- except the treatment of 2% chitosan AS at concentration of 125 mg·L-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“effects of induced resistance of these 4 elicitors with different concentrations against tomato late blight in adult-plant stage were over 70%(except the treatment of 2% chitosan AS at concentration of 125 mg·L-1 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Benzothiadiazole EW at 50 mg/L gave 94.71% field control efficiency.
- Treatment
- 1% benzothiadiazole(EW) at concentration of 50 mg·L-1e0
- Outcome
- control efficienciese0
- Value
- 94.71%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“1% benzothiadiazole(EW) at concentration of 50 mg·L-1 and 3% amino-oligosaccharin AS at concentration of 100 mg·L-1 .Their control efficiencies were 94.71% and 95.89%,respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Amino-oligosaccharin AS at 100 mg/L gave 95.89% field control efficiency.
- Treatment
- 3% amino-oligosaccharin AS at concentration of 100 mg·L-1e0
- Outcome
- control efficienciese0
- Value
- 95.89%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“1% benzothiadiazole(EW) at concentration of 50 mg·L-1 and 3% amino-oligosaccharin AS at concentration of 100 mg·L-1 .Their control efficiencies were 94.71% and 95.89%,respectively”
The same questions in other papers
chitosan · control · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →resistance inducer · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.