Paper · 2022 · Molecules

Impact of Green Chitosan Nanoparticles Fabricated from Shrimp Processing Waste as a Source of Nano Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Yield Quantity and Quality of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars

Ahmed M. Saad; Aya Yaseen Mahmood Alabdali; Mohamed Ebaid; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
52
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Waste from crustaceans has adverse effects on the environment. In this respect, shrimp waste was valorized for producing chitosan nanoparticles as a source for eco-friendly nano-nitrogen fertilizer. The application of nano-nitrogen fertilizers is a valuable alternative approach in agriculture due to its potential for reducing the application of mineral nitrogen fertilizers and increasing yield quality and quantity, thereby helping to reduce the worldwide food shortage. Chitosan nanoparticles were foliar sprayed at three volumes (0, 7, and 14 L/ha) and compared with mineral nitrogen fertilizer (M-N) sprayed at three volumes (0, 120, and 240 kg N/ha) and their combination on two wheat cultivars (Misr-1 and Gemaiza-11) during two consecutive seasons (2019/2020 and 2020/2021) in order to evaluate the agronomic response. The synthesized chitosan nanoparticles displayed characteristic bands of both Nan-N and urea/chitosan from 500–4000 cm−1. They are stable and have a huge surface area of 73.21 m2 g−1. The results revealed significant differences among wheat cultivars, fertilization applications, individual or combined, and their interactions for yield-contributing traits. Foliar application of nano-nitrogen fertilizer at 14 L/ha combined with mineral fertilizer at 240 kg/ha significantly increased total chlorophyll content by 41 and 31% compared to control; concerning plant height, the two cultivars recorded the tallest plants (86.2 and 86.5 cm) compared to control. On the other hand, the heaviest 1000-grain weight (55.8 and 57.4 g) was recorded with treatment of 120 kg Mn-N and 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to the control (47.6 and 45.5 g). The Misr-1 cultivar achieved the highest values for grain yield and nitrogen (1.30 and 1.91 mg/L) and potassium (9.87 and 9.81 mg/L) in the two studied seasons when foliarly sprayed with the combination of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to the Gemaiza-11 cultivar. It can be concluded that Misr-1 exhibited higher levels of total chlorophyll content, spike length, 100-grain weight, grain yield in kg/ha, and nitrogen and potassium. However, Gemaiza-11 displayed higher biomass and straw yield values, plant height, and sodium concentration values. It could be economically recommended to use the application of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha on the Misr-1 cultivar to achieve the highest crop yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-nitrogen at 14 L/ha combined with mineral fertilizer at 240 kg/ha increased total chlorophyll content by 41 and 31% compared to control.

Treatment
Foliar application of nano-nitrogen fertilizer at 14 L/ha combined with mineral fertilizer at 240 kg/hae1
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
41 and 31%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar application of nano-nitrogen fertilizer at 14 L/ha combined with mineral fertilizer at 240 kg/ha significantly increased total chlorophyll content by 41 and 31% compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two wheat cultivars were tallest under foliar nano-nitrogen plus mineral fertilizer compared to control (86.2 and 86.5 cm).

Treatment
Foliar application of nano-nitrogen fertilizer at 14 L/ha combined with mineral fertilizer at 240 kg/hae1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
talleste2
Value
86.2 and 86.5 cme2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar application of nano-nitrogen fertilizer at 14 L/ha combined with mineral fertilizer at 240 kg/ha significantly increased total chlorophyll content by 41 and 31% compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1373 · show in text ↑
e2

“concerning plant height, the two cultivars recorded the tallest plants (86.2 and 86.5 cm) compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1000-grain weight was heaviest with 120 kg Mn-N and 14 L Nan-N/ha (55.8 and 57.4 g) compared to control (47.6 and 45.5 g).

Treatment
120 kg Mn-N and 14 L Nan-N/hae3
Outcome
1000-grain weighte3
Direction
heavieste3
Value
55.8 and 57.4 ge3
Qualifier
47.6 and 45.5 ge3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e3

“the heaviest 1000-grain weight (55.8 and 57.4 g) was recorded with treatment of 120 kg Mn-N and 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to the control (47.6 and 45.5 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr-1 achieved the highest grain yield under 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to Gemaiza-11.

Material
Misr-1e4
Treatment
120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/hae4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Comparator
Gemaiza-11e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Misr-1 cultivar achieved the highest values for grain yield and nitrogen (1.30 and 1.91 mg/L) and potassium (9.87 and 9.81 mg/L) in the two studied seasons when foliarly sprayed with the combination of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to the Gemaiza-11 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr-1 had the highest nitrogen content (1.30 and 1.91 mg/L) under 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to Gemaiza-11.

Material
Misr-1e4
Treatment
120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/hae4
Outcome
nitrogene4
Direction
higheste4
Value
1.30 and 1.91 mg/Le4
Comparator
Gemaiza-11e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Misr-1 cultivar achieved the highest values for grain yield and nitrogen (1.30 and 1.91 mg/L) and potassium (9.87 and 9.81 mg/L) in the two studied seasons when foliarly sprayed with the combination of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to the Gemaiza-11 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr-1 had the highest potassium content (9.87 and 9.81 mg/L) under 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to Gemaiza-11.

Material
Misr-1e4
Treatment
120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/hae4
Outcome
potassiume4
Direction
higheste4
Value
9.87 and 9.81 mg/Le4
Comparator
Gemaiza-11e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e4

“The Misr-1 cultivar achieved the highest values for grain yield and nitrogen (1.30 and 1.91 mg/L) and potassium (9.87 and 9.81 mg/L) in the two studied seasons when foliarly sprayed with the combination of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha compared to the Gemaiza-11 cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1930 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr-1 showed higher spike length and 100-grain weight.

Material
Misr-1e5
Outcome
spike length, 100-grain weighte5
Direction
highere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e5

“Misr-1 exhibited higher levels of total chlorophyll content, spike length, 100-grain weight, grain yield in kg/ha, and nitrogen and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2098 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr-1 had higher total chlorophyll content.

Material
Misr-1e5
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente5
Direction
higher levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e5

“Misr-1 exhibited higher levels of total chlorophyll content, spike length, 100-grain weight, grain yield in kg/ha, and nitrogen and potassium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1957–2098 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemaiza-11 displayed higher biomass and straw yield values.

Material
Gemaiza-11e6
Outcome
biomass and straw yield valuese6
Direction
highere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, Gemaiza-11 displayed higher biomass and straw yield values, plant height, and sodium concentration values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2100–2214 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gemaiza-11 displayed higher plant height and sodium concentration values.

Material
Gemaiza-11e6
Outcome
plant height, and sodium concentration valuese6
Direction
highere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e6

“However, Gemaiza-11 displayed higher biomass and straw yield values, plant height, and sodium concentration values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2100–2214 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha on Misr-1 is economically recommended to achieve the highest crop yield.

Material
Misr-1e7
Treatment
120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/hae7
Outcome
highest crop yielde7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e7

“It could be economically recommended to use the application of 120 kg Mn-N/ha + 14 L Nan-N/ha on the Misr-1 cultivar to achieve the highest crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2216–2366 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant differences exist among wheat cultivars, fertilization applications and their interactions for yield-contributing traits.

Outcome
yield-contributing traitse1
Qualifier
differences among wheat cultivars, fertilization applications, individual or combined, and their interactionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results revealed significant differences among wheat cultivars, fertilization applications, individual or combined, and their interactions for yield-contributing traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1184 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.