Paper · 2004 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese

Y. Parvizi; A. Ronaghi; M. Maftoun; et al.

20
claims
41
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Mineral nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in highly calcareous soils low in available nitrogen (N) and manganese (Mn) requires further investigations. The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effect of N and Mn on the growth, nutrient concentration and uptake, and chlorophyll meter readings (CMR) in wheat grown in greenhouse conditions. The experiment was conducted on a highly calcareous soil (fine-loamy, carbonatic, thermic, Typic Calcixerepts) relatively low in available N and Mn. Treatments consisted of a factorial arrangement of five N rates (0, 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg kg−1 as NH4NO3) and three Mn levels (0, 15, and 30 mg kg−1 as MnSO4) in a completely randomized design with four replications. Plants were grown for 60 d and hand-held chlorophyll meter (Minolta SPAD-502) readings were used to evaluate dry matter (DMY) and N, Mn, iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) concentration of wheat in aerial parts. Applied N increased DMY and concentration and uptake of N, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Cu, and Mn:Fe ratios. A significant correlation was obtained between DMY and applied N (R2 = 0.75). Manganese had no significant effect on DMY, N, Zn, Cu concentration and uptake, and Fe uptake. However, Mn rate increased Mn concentration and uptake and Mn:Fe ratio and reduced Fe concentration. Interaction of N × Mn did not affect DMY, concentration, or uptake of any of the nutrients. The CMR increased significantly with N rate but was not influenced by Mn addition. Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90). It is concluded that portable chlorophyll meter is a quick, reliable, and nondestructive tool for assessing DMY and nutrients affecting leaf greenness in wheat. However, further investigation in field conditions is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased wheat dry matter yield.

Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
DMYe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied N increased DMY and concentration and uptake of N, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Cu, and Mn:Fe ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased wheat concentration and uptake of N, Mn and Fe.

Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of N, Mn, Fee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied N increased DMY and concentration and uptake of N, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Cu, and Mn:Fe ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased wheat concentration and uptake of Zn and Cu.

Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
Zn, and Cue0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
concentration and uptakee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied N increased DMY and concentration and uptake of N, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Cu, and Mn:Fe ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied nitrogen increased the Mn:Fe ratio in wheat.

Treatment
Applied Ne0
Outcome
Mn:Fe ratiose0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Applied N increased DMY and concentration and uptake of N, Mn, Fe, Zn, and Cu, and Mn:Fe ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1046 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter yield was significantly correlated with applied nitrogen (R2 = 0.75).

Treatment
applied Ne1
Outcome
DMYe1
Value
R2 = 0.75e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant correlation was obtained between DMY and applied N (R2 = 0.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese had no significant effect on wheat dry matter yield.

Treatment
Manganesee2
Outcome
DMYe2
Direction
no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“Manganese had no significant effect on DMY, N, Zn, Cu concentration and uptake, and Fe uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese had no significant effect on N, Zn and Cu concentration and uptake in wheat.

Treatment
Manganesee2
Outcome
N, Zn, Cu concentration and uptakee2
Direction
no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“Manganese had no significant effect on DMY, N, Zn, Cu concentration and uptake, and Fe uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese had no significant effect on wheat Fe uptake.

Treatment
Manganesee2
Outcome
Fe uptakee2
Direction
no significant effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e2

“Manganese had no significant effect on DMY, N, Zn, Cu concentration and uptake, and Fe uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese rate increased wheat Mn concentration and uptake and the Mn:Fe ratio.

Treatment
Mn ratee3
Outcome
Mn concentration and uptake and Mn:Fe ratioe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, Mn rate increased Mn concentration and uptake and Mn:Fe ratio and reduced Fe concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese rate reduced wheat Fe concentration.

Treatment
Mn ratee3
Outcome
Fe concentratione3
Direction
reducede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e3

“However, Mn rate increased Mn concentration and uptake and Mn:Fe ratio and reduced Fe concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of N and Mn did not affect wheat dry matter yield or nutrient concentration and uptake.

Treatment
N × Mne4
Outcome
DMYe4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“Interaction of N × Mn did not affect DMY, concentration, or uptake of any of the nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings increased significantly with nitrogen rate in wheat.

Treatment
N ratee5
Outcome
CMRe5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“The CMR increased significantly with N rate but was not influenced by Mn addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1495 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were not influenced by manganese addition in wheat.

Treatment
Mn additione5
Outcome
CMRe5
Direction
not influencede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e5

“The CMR increased significantly with N rate but was not influenced by Mn addition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1495 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly significantly correlated with dry matter yield (R2 = 0.84).

Outcome
CMRe6
Value
R2 = 0.84e6
Setting
greenhouse conditionse7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1683 · show in text ↑
e7

“wheat grown in greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–365 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly significantly correlated with wheat N concentration (R2 = 0.97).

Compound
Ne6
Outcome
CMRe6
Value
R2 = 0.97e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1683 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly significantly correlated with wheat Mn concentration (R2 = 0.70).

Compound
Mne6
Outcome
CMRe6
Value
R2 = 0.70e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1683 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly significantly correlated with wheat Fe concentration (R2 = 0.73).

Compound
Fee6
Outcome
CMRe6
Value
R2 = 0.73e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1683 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly significantly correlated with wheat Zn concentration (R2 = 0.93).

Compound
Zne6
Outcome
CMRe6
Value
R2 = 0.93e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1683 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll meter readings were highly significantly correlated with wheat Cu concentration (R2 = 0.90).

Compound
Cue6
Outcome
CMRe6
Value
R2 = 0.90e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highly significant correlations were observed between CMR and DMY (R2 = 0.84), and the concentrations of N (R2 = 0.97), Mn (R2 = 0.70), Fe (R2 = 0.73), Zn (R2 = 0.93), and Cu (R2 = 0.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1683 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A portable chlorophyll meter is a quick, reliable and nondestructive tool for assessing dry matter and nutrients in wheat.

Outcome
assessing DMY and nutrientse7
Value
quick, reliable, and nondestructivee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Growth, Nutrient Status, and Chlorophyll Meter Readings in Wheat as Affected by Nitrogen and Manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
e7

“It is concluded that portable chlorophyll meter is a quick, reliable, and nondestructive tool for assessing DMY and nutrients affecting leaf greenness in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1844 · show in text ↑

manganese atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 28 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

manganese atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Mn deficiency decreased the biomass, Mn concentration and chlorophyll of wheat.

    Deficiency of manganese is alleviated more by low zinc than low copper in wheat · 2000 · compared with complete nutrient solution

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.