Paper · 2015 · Nanotoxicology

Silver sulfide nanoparticles (Ag2S-NPs) are taken up by plants and are phytotoxic

Peng Wang; Neal W. Menzies; Enzo Lombi; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
110
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silver nanoparticles (NPs) are used in more consumer products than any other nanomaterial and their release into the environment is unavoidable. Of primary concern is the wastewater stream in which most silver NPs are transformed to silver sulfide NPs (Ag2S-NPs) before being applied to agricultural soils within biosolids. While Ag2S-NPs are assumed to be biologically inert, nothing is known of their effects on terrestrial plants. The phytotoxicity of Ag and its accumulation was examined in short-term (24 h) and longer-term (2-week) solution culture experiments with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exposed to Ag2S-NPs (0-20 mg Ag L(-1)), metallic Ag-NPs (0-1.6 mg Ag L(-1)), or ionic Ag (AgNO3; 0-0.086 mg Ag L(-1)). Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period. This toxicity did not result from their dissolution and release of toxic Ag(+) in the rooting medium, with soluble Ag concentrations remaining below 0.001 mg Ag L(-1). Rather, Ag accumulated as Ag2S in the root and shoot tissues when plants were exposed to Ag2S-NPs, consistent with their direct uptake. Importantly, this differed from the form of Ag present in tissues of plants exposed to AgNO3. For the first time, our findings have shown that Ag2S-NPs exert toxic effects through their direct accumulation in terrestrial plant tissues. These findings need to be considered to ensure high yield of food crops, and to avoid increasing Ag in the food chain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cowpea growth was reduced by Ag2S-NPs by up to 52% after two weeks.

Treatment
Ag2S-NPse1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
up to 52%e1
Qualifier
over a 2-week periode1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat growth was reduced by Ag2S-NPs by up to 52% after two weeks.

Treatment
Ag2S-NPse1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
reducede1
Value
up to 52%e1
Qualifier
over a 2-week periode1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cowpea showed no detected growth effect during 24-hour Ag2S-NP exposure.

Treatment
Ag2S-NPse1
Outcome
effectse1
Direction
not inducinge1
Qualifier
24-h exposuree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat showed no detected growth effect during 24-hour Ag2S-NP exposure.

Treatment
Ag2S-NPse1
Outcome
effectse1
Direction
not inducinge1
Qualifier
24-h exposuree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cowpea accumulated Ag as Ag2S in root and shoot tissue following Ag2S-NP exposure.

Organ / stage
root and shoot tissuese1
Treatment
Ag2S-NPse1
Outcome
Ag accumulated as Ag2Se1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ag accumulated as Ag2S in the root and shoot tissues when plants were exposed to Ag2S-NPs, consistent with their direct uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat accumulated Ag as Ag2S in root and shoot tissue following Ag2S-NP exposure.

Organ / stage
root and shoot tissuese1
Treatment
Ag2S-NPse1
Outcome
Ag accumulated as Ag2Se1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ag accumulated as Ag2S in the root and shoot tissues when plants were exposed to Ag2S-NPs, consistent with their direct uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1178 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ag2S-NP toxicity did not result from dissolution to soluble Ag in the rooting medium.

Outcome
This toxicitye1
Value
below 0.001 mg Ag L(-1)e1
Qualifier
did not result from their dissolution and release of toxic Ag(+)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“This toxicity did not result from their dissolution and release of toxic Ag(+) in the rooting medium, with soluble Ag concentrations remaining below 0.001 mg Ag L(-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The form of Ag in plant tissue following Ag2S-NP exposure differed from exposure to AgNO3.

Outcome
form of Ag present in tissuese1
Comparator
AgNO3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–640 · show in text ↑
e1

“Importantly, this differed from the form of Ag present in tissues of plants exposed to AgNO3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1272 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.