Abstract
Silver nanoparticles (NPs) are used in more consumer products than any other nanomaterial and their release into the environment is unavoidable. Of primary concern is the wastewater stream in which most silver NPs are transformed to silver sulfide NPs (Ag2S-NPs) before being applied to agricultural soils within biosolids. While Ag2S-NPs are assumed to be biologically inert, nothing is known of their effects on terrestrial plants. The phytotoxicity of Ag and its accumulation was examined in short-term (24 h) and longer-term (2-week) solution culture experiments with cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exposed to Ag2S-NPs (0-20 mg Ag L(-1)), metallic Ag-NPs (0-1.6 mg Ag L(-1)), or ionic Ag (AgNO3; 0-0.086 mg Ag L(-1)). Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period. This toxicity did not result from their dissolution and release of toxic Ag(+) in the rooting medium, with soluble Ag concentrations remaining below 0.001 mg Ag L(-1). Rather, Ag accumulated as Ag2S in the root and shoot tissues when plants were exposed to Ag2S-NPs, consistent with their direct uptake. Importantly, this differed from the form of Ag present in tissues of plants exposed to AgNO3. For the first time, our findings have shown that Ag2S-NPs exert toxic effects through their direct accumulation in terrestrial plant tissues. These findings need to be considered to ensure high yield of food crops, and to avoid increasing Ag in the food chain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
cowpea growth was reduced by Ag2S-NPs by up to 52% after two weeks.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Ag2S-NPse1
- Outcome
- growthe1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- up to 52%e1
- Qualifier
- over a 2-week periode1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”
Claim · model-written summary
wheat growth was reduced by Ag2S-NPs by up to 52% after two weeks.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Ag2S-NPse1
- Outcome
- growthe1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Value
- up to 52%e1
- Qualifier
- over a 2-week periode1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”
Claim · model-written summary
cowpea showed no detected growth effect during 24-hour Ag2S-NP exposure.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- Ag2S-NPse1
- Outcome
- effectse1
- Direction
- not inducinge1
- Qualifier
- 24-h exposuree1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”
Claim · model-written summary
wheat showed no detected growth effect during 24-hour Ag2S-NP exposure.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Ag2S-NPse1
- Outcome
- effectse1
- Direction
- not inducinge1
- Qualifier
- 24-h exposuree1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Although not inducing any effects during 24-h exposure, Ag2S-NPs reduced growth by up to 52% over a 2-week period.”
Claim · model-written summary
cowpea accumulated Ag as Ag2S in root and shoot tissue following Ag2S-NP exposure.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Organ / stage
- root and shoot tissuese1
- Treatment
- Ag2S-NPse1
- Outcome
- Ag accumulated as Ag2Se1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Ag accumulated as Ag2S in the root and shoot tissues when plants were exposed to Ag2S-NPs, consistent with their direct uptake.”
Claim · model-written summary
wheat accumulated Ag as Ag2S in root and shoot tissue following Ag2S-NP exposure.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Organ / stage
- root and shoot tissuese1
- Treatment
- Ag2S-NPse1
- Outcome
- Ag accumulated as Ag2Se1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Ag accumulated as Ag2S in the root and shoot tissues when plants were exposed to Ag2S-NPs, consistent with their direct uptake.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ag2S-NP toxicity did not result from dissolution to soluble Ag in the rooting medium.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Outcome
- This toxicitye1
- Value
- below 0.001 mg Ag L(-1)e1
- Qualifier
- did not result from their dissolution and release of toxic Ag(+)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“This toxicity did not result from their dissolution and release of toxic Ag(+) in the rooting medium, with soluble Ag concentrations remaining below 0.001 mg Ag L(-1).”
Claim · model-written summary
The form of Ag in plant tissue following Ag2S-NP exposure differed from exposure to AgNO3.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- form of Ag present in tissuese1
- Comparator
- AgNO3e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“Importantly, this differed from the form of Ag present in tissues of plants exposed to AgNO3.”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.