Paper · 2016 · Russian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effects of silicon oxide nanoparticles on growth and physiology of wheat seedlings

J. Karimi; S. Mohsenzadeh

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
107
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of silicon oxide (SiO 2 ) nanoparticles at concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/L on Triticum aestivum L. seedlings were investigated. We showed that SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight, decreased roots and shoots dry weight, decreased amounts of chlorophyll a and b in leaves, decreased amount of carotenoids in leaves, increased proline content in leaves, increased lipid peroxidation in leaves, and increased catalase activity in leaves. Results of this study indicate that at lower concentrations (such as 50 and 100 mg/L), SiO 2 nanoparticles not only have negative effects on wheat seedlings, but can have even some positive effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nanoparticle concentrations decreased root and shoot fresh weight.

Treatment
SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le0
Outcome
roots and shoots fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nanoparticle concentrations decreased root and shoot dry weight.

Treatment
SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le0
Outcome
roots and shoots dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight, decreased roots and shoots dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–407 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nanoparticle concentrations decreased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
SiO 2 nanoparticlese0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b in leaves, decreased amount of carotenoids in leavese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight, decreased roots and shoots dry weight, decreased amounts of chlorophyll a and b in leaves, decreased amount of carotenoids in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–502 · show in text ↑
e1

“at concentrations higher 200 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–227 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High nanoparticle concentrations increased leaf proline content, lipid peroxidation and catalase activity.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le1
Outcome
proline content in leaves, increased lipid peroxidation in leaves, and increased catalase activity in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased proline content in leaves, increased lipid peroxidation in leaves, and increased catalase activity in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–622 · show in text ↑
e1

“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–227 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nanoparticle concentrations could have some positive effects on wheat seedlings.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
SiO 2 nanoparticlese0
Outcome
negative effects on wheat seedlings, but can have even some positive effectse0
Qualifier
at lower concentrations (such as 50 and 100 mg/L)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at lower concentrations (such as 50 and 100 mg/L), SiO 2 nanoparticles not only have negative effects on wheat seedlings, but can have even some positive effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–821 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 35 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.