Abstract
The effects of silicon oxide (SiO 2 ) nanoparticles at concentrations of 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/L on Triticum aestivum L. seedlings were investigated. We showed that SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight, decreased roots and shoots dry weight, decreased amounts of chlorophyll a and b in leaves, decreased amount of carotenoids in leaves, increased proline content in leaves, increased lipid peroxidation in leaves, and increased catalase activity in leaves. Results of this study indicate that at lower concentrations (such as 50 and 100 mg/L), SiO 2 nanoparticles not only have negative effects on wheat seedlings, but can have even some positive effects.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
High nanoparticle concentrations decreased root and shoot fresh weight.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le0
- Outcome
- roots and shoots fresh weighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight”
Claim · model-written summary
High nanoparticle concentrations decreased root and shoot dry weight.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le0
- Outcome
- roots and shoots dry weighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L, had negative impacts on wheat seedlings. At these concentrations, SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight, decreased roots and shoots dry weight”
Claim · model-written summary
High nanoparticle concentrations decreased leaf chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids.
- Taxon
- wheat seedlings
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- SiO 2 nanoparticlese0
- Outcome
- chlorophyll a and b in leaves, decreased amount of carotenoids in leavese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Qualifier
- at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“SiO 2 nanoparticles significantly decreased roots and shoots fresh weight, decreased roots and shoots dry weight, decreased amounts of chlorophyll a and b in leaves, decreased amount of carotenoids in leaves”
e1“at concentrations higher 200 mg/L”
t0“wheat seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
High nanoparticle concentrations increased leaf proline content, lipid peroxidation and catalase activity.
- Taxon
- wheat seedlings
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/Le1
- Outcome
- proline content in leaves, increased lipid peroxidation in leaves, and increased catalase activity in leavese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“increased proline content in leaves, increased lipid peroxidation in leaves, and increased catalase activity in leaves”
e1“SiO 2 nanoparticles, at concentrations higher 200 mg/L”
t0“wheat seedlings”
Claim · model-written summary
Lower nanoparticle concentrations could have some positive effects on wheat seedlings.
- Taxon
- wheat seedlings
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SiO 2 nanoparticlese0
- Outcome
- negative effects on wheat seedlings, but can have even some positive effectse0
- Qualifier
- at lower concentrations (such as 50 and 100 mg/L)e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“at lower concentrations (such as 50 and 100 mg/L), SiO 2 nanoparticles not only have negative effects on wheat seedlings, but can have even some positive effects”
The same questions in other papers
silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →silicon dioxide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
silicon dioxide · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 146 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
164 papers more in this group
See all 168 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.