Paper · 2022 · Environmental Technology & Innovation

Exogenously applied ZnO nanoparticles induced salt tolerance in potentially high yielding modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars

Irfana Lalarukh; Nayab Zahra; Arwa A. Al Huqail; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Salinity stress is one of the potential threats that adversely affect the productivity of many cereal crops worldwide. Spraying plants with nano-Zn particles may lessen effectively such negative impacts on plants; yet its mode of action is still not well explored. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of spraying nano-Zn particles with varying concentrations (0, 20, 50 and 80 mg L−1) on two wheat cultivars irrigated with saline water (EC = 6.3 dS m−1) versus a non-saline one. The key results revealed that root and shoot weights decreased significantly under salinity stress conditions, while improved considerably with nano-Zn-particles foliar application up to 50 mg nano-Zn L−1; thereafter significant reductions occurred. Also, shoot and root lengths as well as plant leaf area index improved considerably owing to this foliar application. Clearly, roots and shoots weights of wheat plants sprayed with nano-Zn particles under salinity stress conditions exhibited higher values than the corresponding ones that was grown under non-saline conditions without nano-Zn-particles applications. Unexpectedly, this foliar spray led to significant reductions in plant pigments and also in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants. Yet, this foliar spray enhanced formation of total soluble sugars and proline, and raised significantly Ca contents in wheat roots and shoots, and to some extent K contents. In conclusion, the foliar application of nano-Zn particles increased plant growth under salty stress conditions via two parallel processes, i.e., stimulating formation of osmolytes and stimulating nutrient uptake which may, in turn, increase plant metabolism.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased root and shoot weights.

Treatment
salinity stress conditionse0
Outcome
root and shoot weightse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“root and shoot weights decreased significantly under salinity stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn improved root and shoot weights up to 50 mg nano-Zn L−1 under salinity.

Treatment
nano-Zn-particles foliar application up to 50 mg nano-Zn L−1e0
Outcome
root and shoot weightse1
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“while improved considerably with nano-Zn-particles foliar application up to 50 mg nano-Zn L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–696 · show in text ↑
e1

“root and shoot weights decreased significantly under salinity stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 522–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At concentrations above 50 mg nano-Zn L−1, root and shoot weights were significantly reduced.

Treatment
nano-Zn-particles foliar applicatione0
Outcome
root and shoot weightse0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
thereaftere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“The key results revealed that root and shoot weights decreased significantly under salinity stress conditions, while improved considerably with nano-Zn-particles foliar application up to 50 mg nano-Zn L−1; thereafter significant reductions occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn improved shoot and root lengths and leaf area index.

Treatment
Spraying plants with nano-Zn particlese1
Outcome
shoot and root lengths as well as plant leaf area indexe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“Also, shoot and root lengths as well as plant leaf area index improved considerably owing to this foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying plants with nano-Zn particles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salinity, sprayed wheat had higher root and shoot weights than unsprayed wheat under non-saline conditions.

Treatment
sprayed with nano-Zn particles under salinity stress conditionse0
Outcome
roots and shoots weightse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
grown under non-saline conditions without nano-Zn-particles applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots and shoots weights of wheat plants sprayed with nano-Zn particles under salinity stress conditions exhibited higher values than the corresponding ones that was grown under non-saline conditions without nano-Zn-particles applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn significantly reduced plant pigments.

Treatment
this foliar spraye0
Outcome
plant pigmentse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“this foliar spray led to significant reductions in plant pigments and also in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn significantly reduced enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants.

Treatment
this foliar spraye0
Outcome
enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidantse0
Direction
reductionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“this foliar spray led to significant reductions in plant pigments and also in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn enhanced total soluble sugars and proline formation.

Treatment
this foliar spraye0
Outcome
formation of total soluble sugars and prolinee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“this foliar spray enhanced formation of total soluble sugars and proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn significantly raised Ca content in wheat roots and shoots.

Organ / stage
roots and shootse0
Treatment
this foliar spraye1
Outcome
Ca contentse0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“raised significantly Ca contents in wheat roots and shoots, and to some extent K contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“this foliar spray enhanced formation of total soluble sugars and proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1330 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nano-Zn raised K contents to some extent.

Treatment
this foliar spraye1
Outcome
K contentse0
Direction
raisede0
Qualifier
to some extente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑
e0

“raised significantly Ca contents in wheat roots and shoots, and to some extent K contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1426 · show in text ↑
e1

“this foliar spray enhanced formation of total soluble sugars and proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1330 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute increased wheat growth under salt stress to osmolyte formation and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
foliar application of nano-Zn particlese0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
stimulating formation of osmolytes and stimulating nutrient uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar application of nano-Zn particles increased plant growth under salty stress conditions via two parallel processes, i.e., stimulating formation of osmolytes and stimulating nutrient uptake which may, in turn, increase plant metabolism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1686 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–125 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 146 positive, 22 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

307 papers: 273 positive, 34 negative or no effect

272 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

303 papers more in this group

See all 307 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.