Paper · 2016 · Journal of Zankoy Sulaimani - Part A

Physiological and Yield Responses of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Different Herbicide Treatments

Kawa Ali; Muhsin Qadir; Samira Rasoul; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field study was conducted at Erbil agricultural research directorate to investigate the physiological and yield responses of wheat to five post emergence herbicides; Tribenuron-methyl; Pyroxsulam; mesosulfuron+ idosulfuron; Clodinafop-propargyl and Clodinafop-propargyl +Pinoxaden herbicides, while weed infested wheat plots and weed free wheat plots treated as controls. Results revealed significant increase of plant height when treated with Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide comparing to the lowest height in weed-free wheat plots. Number of spikes per meter square significantly increased with Pyroxsulam and reduced in weed infested wheat plots. Number of grains per spike and 1000 grains weight were at maximum levels in weed-free wheat plots and minimum levels were found with weed infested wheat treatments. Biological yield significantly increased with Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide, while Tribenuron-methyl caused a significant decrease of biological yield. All treatments caused a significant increase of economical yield compared with weed infested wheat plots. Chlorophyll content reduced in wheat plants after spraying herbicides showed sever reduction after spraying all studied herbicides with recovery process of photosynthetic pigments except with Pyroxsulam and mesosulfuron+ idosulfuron herbicides. According to EWRC scale the most efficient to less efficient herbicide arrangement will be as Clodinafop-propargyl +Pinoxaden, mesosulfuron+ idosulfuron, Pyroxsulam, Clodinafop-propargyland Tribenuron-methyl.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide significantly increased wheat plant height compared with the lowest height in weed-free plots.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl herbicidee1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
weed-free wheat plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results revealed significant increase of plant height when treated with Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide comparing to the lowest height in weed-free wheat plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–532 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam significantly increased the number of spikes per square meter in wheat.

Treatment
Pyroxsulame2
Outcome
Number of spikes per meter squaree2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“Number of spikes per meter square significantly increased with Pyroxsulam and reduced in weed infested wheat plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation reduced the number of spikes per square meter in wheat.

Treatment
weed infested wheat plotse2
Outcome
Number of spikes per meter squaree2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“Number of spikes per meter square significantly increased with Pyroxsulam and reduced in weed infested wheat plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per spike and 1000-grain weight were at maximum in weed-free wheat plots and minimum with weed infestation.

Treatment
weed-free wheat plotse3
Outcome
Number of grains per spike and 1000 grains weighte3
Direction
maximum levelse3
Qualifier
minimum levels were found with weed infested wheat treatmentse3
Comparator
weed infested wheat treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“Number of grains per spike and 1000 grains weight were at maximum levels in weed-free wheat plots and minimum levels were found with weed infested wheat treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide significantly increased biological yield in wheat.

Treatment
Clodinafop-propargyl herbicidee4
Outcome
Biological yielde4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“Biological yield significantly increased with Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide, while Tribenuron-methyl caused a significant decrease of biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron-methyl significantly decreased biological yield in wheat.

Treatment
Tribenuron-methyle4
Outcome
biological yielde4
Direction
decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“Biological yield significantly increased with Clodinafop-propargyl herbicide, while Tribenuron-methyl caused a significant decrease of biological yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–966 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments significantly increased economical yield compared with weed-infested wheat plots.

Treatment
All treatmentse5
Outcome
economical yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
weed infested wheat plotse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“All treatments caused a significant increase of economical yield compared with weed infested wheat plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying herbicides reduced wheat chlorophyll content, with a severe reduction.

Treatment
spraying herbicidese6
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente6
Direction
reducede6
Qualifier
sever reductione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chlorophyll content reduced in wheat plants after spraying herbicides showed sever reduction after spraying all studied herbicides with recovery process of photosynthetic pigments except with Pyroxsulam and mesosulfuron+ idosulfuron herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigments recovered after spraying all studied herbicides, except with Pyroxsulam and mesosulfuron+idosulfuron.

Treatment
spraying all studied herbicidese6
Outcome
recovery process of photosynthetic pigmentse6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Qualifier
except with Pyroxsulam and mesosulfuron+ idosulfuron herbicidese6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chlorophyll content reduced in wheat plants after spraying herbicides showed sever reduction after spraying all studied herbicides with recovery process of photosynthetic pigments except with Pyroxsulam and mesosulfuron+ idosulfuron herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1317 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

According to the EWRC scale, herbicide efficiency ranks from most to least efficient as Clodinafop-propargyl+Pinoxaden, mesosulfuron+idosulfuron, Pyroxsulam, Clodinafop-propargyl and Tribenuron-methyl.

Outcome
the most efficient to less efficient herbicide arrangemente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–62 · show in text ↑
e7

“According to EWRC scale the most efficient to less efficient herbicide arrangement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1401 · show in text ↑

clodinafop-propargyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

45 papers: 41 positive, 4 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

tribenuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

clodinafop-propargyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

herbicide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 4 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

infection · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 32 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.