Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds and Their Nutrient Partitioning under Various Establishment Methods and Weed Management Practices in Temperate Environment

Aijaz Nazir; Mohammad Anwar Bhat; Tauseef Ahmad Bhat; et al.

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
19
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A research trial was conducted at Agronomy Farm (SKUAST-K, Wadura, Jammu & Kashmir), during kharif 2017 and 2018 to evaluate nutrient removal in rice under various rice establishment methods and weed control measures. The study comprised of two factors: rice establishment techniques {Transplanting (TPR); Direct seeding (DSR) and System of rice intensification (SRI)} as main plot treatments and weed control measures {Butachlor @ 1500 g a.i ha−1 (B); Penoxsulam @ 22.5 g a.i ha−1 (P); Pyrazosulfuron ethyl + Pretilachlor @ 15 and 600 g a.i ha−1 (PP); Bensulfuron methyl + Pretilachlor @ 60 and 600 g a.i ha−1 (BP); 2 Conoweeding/Hand Weeding (CW/HW); Weed free (WF) and weedy check (WC)} as sub-plot treatments meant to evaluate the best establishment method and weed management practice for rice. Over DSR and transplanted rice, the SRI technique yielded a significant increase in dry biomass accumulation (17.04 and 17.20 t ha−1) and grain (7.92 and 8.17 t ha−1) and straw (9.60 and 10.17 t ha−1) yields. Penoxsulam herbicide significantly showed higher grain and straw yield of 8.19 and 8.28 t ha−1 and 10.13 and 10.44 t ha−1, respectively, than other weed management measures by comparing the means using critical difference. TPR excelled in reducing dry weed biomass more than other established methods. All herbicides considerably reduced dry weed biomass, but Penoxsulam herbicide showed the greatest reduction in dry weed biomass and proved superior against complex weed flora. Weeds showed maximum contribution towards total Biomass under DSR, among rice establishment techniques. In contrast, among different weed control measures, it was maximum in weedy check treatment (Untreated Control) and minimum in penoxsulam treatment. SRI significantly excelled in crop (grain and straw) nutrient uptake compared to the DSR and TPR method, although different crop establishment techniques non-significantly influenced nutrient concentrations. Furthermore, penoxsulam treatment demonstrated higher crop (grain and straw) nutrient uptake among the various weed management measures. However, available soil nutrients were observed among establishment techniques, highest in DSR and lowest in SRI. Moreover, direct-seeded rice excelled SRI and transplanted rice in weed nutrient uptake, and among the different herbicidal treatments, penoxsulam recorded the lowest uptake in weeds. Nutrient budgeting demonstrated that DSR showed the maximum percentage of nutrient removal by weeds, and the minimum ratio was in TPR. In contrast, the lowest rate of nutrients removed via weeds were seen in penoxsulam application under various weed management measures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased dry biomass accumulation over DSR and transplanted rice, reaching 17.04 and 17.20 t/ha.

Treatment
SRI techniquee1
Outcome
dry biomass accumulatione1
Direction
increasee1
Value
17.04 and 17.20 t ha−1e1
Comparator
DSR and transplanted ricee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over DSR and transplanted rice, the SRI technique yielded a significant increase in dry biomass accumulation (17.04 and 17.20 t ha−1) and grain (7.92 and 8.17 t ha−1) and straw (9.60 and 10.17 t ha−1) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased grain yield over DSR and transplanted rice, reaching 7.92 and 8.17 t/ha.

Treatment
SRI techniquee1
Outcome
graine1
Direction
increasee1
Value
7.92 and 8.17 t ha−1e1
Comparator
DSR and transplanted ricee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over DSR and transplanted rice, the SRI technique yielded a significant increase in dry biomass accumulation (17.04 and 17.20 t ha−1) and grain (7.92 and 8.17 t ha−1) and straw (9.60 and 10.17 t ha−1) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI increased straw yield over DSR and transplanted rice, reaching 9.60 and 10.17 t/ha.

Treatment
SRI techniquee1
Outcome
strawe1
Direction
increasee1
Value
9.60 and 10.17 t ha−1e1
Comparator
DSR and transplanted ricee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Over DSR and transplanted rice, the SRI technique yielded a significant increase in dry biomass accumulation (17.04 and 17.20 t ha−1) and grain (7.92 and 8.17 t ha−1) and straw (9.60 and 10.17 t ha−1) yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam herbicide gave higher grain yield (8.19 and 8.28 t/ha) than other weed management measures.

Treatment
Penoxsulam herbicidee2
Outcome
graine2
Direction
highere2
Value
8.19 and 8.28 t ha−1e2
Comparator
other weed management measurese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“Penoxsulam herbicide significantly showed higher grain and straw yield of 8.19 and 8.28 t ha−1 and 10.13 and 10.44 t ha−1, respectively, than other weed management measures by comparing the means using critical difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam herbicide gave higher straw yield (10.13 and 10.44 t/ha) than other weed management measures.

Treatment
Penoxsulam herbicidee2
Outcome
strawe2
Direction
highere2
Value
10.13 and 10.44 t ha−1e2
Comparator
other weed management measurese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e2

“Penoxsulam herbicide significantly showed higher grain and straw yield of 8.19 and 8.28 t ha−1 and 10.13 and 10.44 t ha−1, respectively, than other weed management measures by comparing the means using critical difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1230 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transplanted rice reduced dry weed biomass more than the other establishment methods.

Treatment
TPRe3
Interactor
weede3weed
Outcome
dry weed biomasse3
Direction
reducinge3
Comparator
other established methodse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e3

“TPR excelled in reducing dry weed biomass more than other established methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides considerably reduced dry weed biomass in rice.

Treatment
herbicidese4
Interactor
weede4weed
Outcome
dry weed biomasse4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e4

“All herbicides considerably reduced dry weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1363 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam showed the greatest reduction in dry weed biomass and was superior against the complex weed flora.

Treatment
Penoxsulam herbicidee5
Interactor
weede5weed
Outcome
dry weed biomasse5
Direction
greatest reductione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e5

“Penoxsulam herbicide showed the greatest reduction in dry weed biomass and proved superior against complex weed flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1486 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds contributed the maximum share of total biomass under DSR among the establishment techniques.

Treatment
DSRe6
Interactor
Weedse6weed
Outcome
contribution towards total Biomasse6
Direction
maximume6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e6

“Weeds showed maximum contribution towards total Biomass under DSR, among rice establishment techniques”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1590 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among weed control measures, the weed contribution was maximum in the weedy check and minimum in penoxsulam.

Interactor
weede7weed
Outcome
maximum in weedy check treatment (Untreated Control) and minimum in penoxsulam treatmente7
Direction
maximume7
Comparator
weedy check treatment (Untreated Control)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e7

“among different weed control measures, it was maximum in weedy check treatment (Untreated Control) and minimum in penoxsulam treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SRI significantly increased crop nutrient uptake in grain and straw compared with DSR and TPR.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe1
Treatment
SRIe1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
excellede1
Comparator
DSR and TPR methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“SRI significantly excelled in crop (grain and straw) nutrient uptake compared to the DSR and TPR method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1741–1844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop establishment techniques did not significantly influence crop nutrient concentrations.

Treatment
different crop establishment techniquese1
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse1
Direction
non-significantly influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“different crop establishment techniques non-significantly influenced nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam treatment gave higher crop nutrient uptake in grain and straw than the other weed management measures.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe1
Treatment
penoxsulam treatmente1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
various weed management measurese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“penoxsulam treatment demonstrated higher crop (grain and straw) nutrient uptake among the various weed management measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1962–2084 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Available soil nutrients were highest under DSR and lowest under SRI.

Treatment
establishment techniquese1
Outcome
available soil nutrientse1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“available soil nutrients were observed among establishment techniques, highest in DSR and lowest in SRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2095–2198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct-seeded rice excelled SRI and transplanted rice in weed nutrient uptake.

Treatment
direct-seeded ricee1
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed nutrient uptakee1
Direction
excellede1
Comparator
SRI and transplanted ricee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“direct-seeded rice excelled SRI and transplanted rice in weed nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2210–2287 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam recorded the lowest nutrient uptake in weeds among the herbicidal treatments.

Treatment
penoxsulame1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
uptake in weedse1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
different herbicidal treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“among the different herbicidal treatments, penoxsulam recorded the lowest uptake in weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2293–2382 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct-seeded rice showed the maximum percentage of nutrient removal by weeds in nutrient budgeting.

Treatment
DSRe1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
percentage of nutrient removal by weedse1
Direction
maximume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nutrient budgeting demonstrated that DSR showed the maximum percentage of nutrient removal by weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2384–2483 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In nutrient budgeting, the ratio was minimum in transplanted rice (TPR).

Treatment
TPRe1
Outcome
ratioe1
Direction
minimume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“and the minimum ratio was in TPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2485–2517 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penoxsulam application gave the lowest rate of nutrients removed via weeds among the weed management measures.

Treatment
penoxsulam applicatione1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
rate of nutrients removed via weedse1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
various weed management measurese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparative Analysis of Rice and Weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“the lowest rate of nutrients removed via weeds were seen in penoxsulam application under various weed management measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2532–2653 · show in text ↑

Penoxsulam · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

87 papers: 75 positive, 12 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

Penoxsulam · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

Penoxsulam · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 119 positive, 25 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

221 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.