Paper · 2017 · Field Crops Research

Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis

Daniela R. Carrijo; Mark E. Lundy; Bruce A. Linquist

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
735
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Rice systems provide a major source of calories for more than half of the world’s population; however, they also use more water than other major crops. Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) is an irrigation practice (introduction of unsaturated soil conditions during the growing season) that can reduce water inputs in rice, yet it has not been widely adopted, in part, due to the potential for reduced yields. We conducted a meta-analysis to: 1) quantify the effect of AWD on rice yields and water use; and 2) to identify soil properties and management practices that favor AWD yields and promote low water use relative to continuous flooding (CF- control). We analyzed 56 studies with 528 side-by-side comparisons of AWD with CF. Overall, AWD decreased yields by 5.4%; however under Mild AWD (i.e. when soil water potential was ≥ −20 kPa or field water level did not drop below 15 cm from the soil surface), yields were not significantly reduced in most circumstances. In contrast, Severe AWD (when soils dried beyond −20 kPa) resulted in yield losses of 22.6% relative to CF. These yield losses were most pronounced in soils with pH ≥ 7 or carbon < 1% or when AWD was imposed throughout the season. While water use was lowest under Severe AWD, under Mild AWD water use was reduced by 23.4% relative to CF. Our findings both highlight the potential of AWD to reduce water inputs without jeopardizing yield as well as the conditions under which these results can be realized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall alternate wetting and drying decreased rice yields by 5.4%.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
e0

“Overall, AWD decreased yields by 5.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild alternate wetting and drying did not significantly reduce rice yields in most circumstances.

Treatment
Mild AWDe0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not significantly reducede0
Qualifier
in most circumstancese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
e0

“under Mild AWD (i.e. when soil water potential was ≥ −20 kPa or field water level did not drop below 15 cm from the soil surface), yields were not significantly reduced in most circumstances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–967 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe alternate wetting and drying reduced rice yield by 22.6% relative to continuous flooding.

Treatment
Severe AWDe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
lossese0
Value
22.6%e0
Qualifier
when soils dried beyond −20 kPae0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
e0

“Severe AWD (when soils dried beyond −20 kPa) resulted in yield losses of 22.6% relative to CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield losses were greatest with soil pH at least 7, carbon below 1%, or season-long AWD.

Treatment
AWDe0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
most pronouncede0
Qualifier
soils with pH ≥ 7 or carbon < 1% or when AWD was imposed throughout the seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
e0

“These yield losses were most pronounced in soils with pH ≥ 7 or carbon < 1% or when AWD was imposed throughout the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use was lowest under severe AWD.

Treatment
Severe AWDe0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
e0

“water use was lowest under Severe AWD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild AWD reduced water use by 23.4% relative to continuous flooding.

Treatment
Mild AWDe0
Outcome
water usee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23.4%e0
Comparator
CFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 · show in text ↑
e0

“under Mild AWD water use was reduced by 23.4% relative to CF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1305 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.