Paper · 2022 · SOIL

Effects of mild alternate wetting and drying irrigation and rice straw application on N 2 O emissions in rice cultivation

Kaikuo Wu; Wentao Li; Zhanbo Wei; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract. The shortage of water resources and the decline in soil organic matter (SOM) are critical limiting factors affecting the improvement in rice productivity, while alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation and recycling application of rice straw (S) are considered favorable mitigation measures. However, the impact of such measures on rice yield and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, needs to be further clarified to ensure that agronomic practices save water, conserve soil, and reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, we explored the effects of mild AWD irrigation combined with on-site rice straw recycling on N2O emissions and rice yield through rice pot experiments. This experiment included 2 irrigation methods (continuous flooding (CF) irrigation and mild AWD irrigation), 2 nitrogen (N) application levels (0 and 225 kg N ha−1) and 2 rice straw return levels (0 and 9000 kg ha−1), for a total of 10 treatments, and each treatment had 3 replicates. The 15N-urea and 15N-S were added to the soil. The results showed that N2O emissions were primarily affected by urea application and irrigation methods, with urea application being most important. Compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation increased cumulative N2O emissions, with an average increase of 28.8 %. In addition, adding rice straw to mild AWD irrigation further stimulated N2O emissions by 18.1 %. Under the condition of urea application, compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation increased the yield-scaled N2O emissions by 17.9 %, and the addition of rice straw further promoted the yield-scaled N2O emissions under mild AWD irrigation by 17.4 % but reduced the global warming potential (GWP) (methane (CH4) + N2O) by 62.9 %. Under the condition of urea application, compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation reduced the uptake of soil-derived N and aboveground biomass of rice but did not reduce rice yield. Therefore, mild AWD irrigation combined with rice straw return may be a promising agronomic method to maintain rice yield, reduce GHGs, and protect or improve soil fertility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea application and irrigation methods primarily affected N2O emissions, with urea application most important.

Treatment
urea application and irrigation methodse0
Outcome
N2O emissionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N2O emissions were primarily affected by urea application and irrigation methods, with urea application being most important”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1197 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild AWD increased cumulative N2O emissions by an average 28.8% over continuous flooding.

Treatment
mild AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
cumulative N2O emissionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.8 %e0
Comparator
CF irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation increased cumulative N2O emissions, with an average increase of 28.8 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding straw under mild AWD further stimulated N2O emissions by 18.1%.

Treatment
adding rice straw to mild AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
N2O emissionse0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
18.1 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding rice straw to mild AWD irrigation further stimulated N2O emissions by 18.1 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under urea application, mild AWD increased yield-scaled N2O emissions by 17.9% over flooding.

Treatment
mild AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
yield-scaled N2O emissionse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.9 %e0
Qualifier
Under the condition of urea applicatione0
Comparator
CF irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of urea application, compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation increased the yield-scaled N2O emissions by 17.9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1418–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding straw under mild AWD increased yield-scaled N2O emissions by 17.4%.

Treatment
addition of rice strawe0
Outcome
yield-scaled N2O emissionse0
Direction
promotede0
Value
17.4 %e0
Qualifier
under mild AWD irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of rice straw further promoted the yield-scaled N2O emissions under mild AWD irrigation by 17.4 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1674 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding straw under mild AWD reduced global warming potential by 62.9%.

Treatment
addition of rice strawe0
Outcome
global warming potential (GWP)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
62.9 %e0
Qualifier
under mild AWD irrigatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“addition of rice straw further promoted the yield-scaled N2O emissions under mild AWD irrigation by 17.4 % but reduced the global warming potential (GWP) (methane (CH4) + N2O) by 62.9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1753 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under urea, mild AWD reduced uptake of soil-derived nitrogen compared with flooding.

Treatment
mild AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
uptake of soil-derived Ne0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Under the condition of urea applicatione0
Comparator
CF irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of urea application, compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation reduced the uptake of soil-derived N and aboveground biomass of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1913 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under urea, mild AWD reduced aboveground rice biomass compared with flooding.

Treatment
mild AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
aboveground biomass of ricee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Under the condition of urea applicatione0
Comparator
CF irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of urea application, compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation reduced the uptake of soil-derived N and aboveground biomass of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1913 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under urea, mild AWD did not reduce rice yield compared with flooding.

Treatment
mild AWD irrigatione0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
did not reducee0
Qualifier
Under the condition of urea applicatione0
Comparator
CF irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the condition of urea application, compared with CF irrigation, mild AWD irrigation reduced the uptake of soil-derived N and aboveground biomass of rice but did not reduce rice yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1943 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest mild AWD with straw return to maintain yield, reduce greenhouse gases and protect soil fertility.

Treatment
mild AWD irrigation combined with rice straw returne0
Outcome
maintain rice yield, reduce GHGs, and protect or improve soil fertilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mild AWD irrigation combined with rice straw return may be a promising agronomic method to maintain rice yield, reduce GHGs, and protect or improve soil fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2118 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 · show in text ↑

irrigation · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 109 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 109 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 119 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 222 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 222 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

287 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.