Paper · 2021 · Weed Technology

Integrated weed management in transplanted rice: options for addressing labor constraints and improving farmers’ income in Bangladesh

Sharif Ahmed; Virender Kumar; Murshedul Alam; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract In Bangladesh, weeds in transplanted rice are largely controlled by labor-intensive and costly manual weeding, resulting in inadequate and untimely weed control. Labor scarcity coupled with intensive rice production has triggered increased use of herbicides. These factors warrant a cost-effective and strategic integrated weed management (IWM) approach. On-farm trials with transplanted rice were conducted during monsoon (‘ Aman ’) season in 2016 and 2017 and winter (‘ Boro ’) season in 2016 to 2017 in agroecological zones 11 and 12 with ten treatments—seven herbicide-based IWM options, one mechanical weed control-based option, and two checks (farmers’ current weed control practice and weed-free)—to assess effects on weed control, grain yield, labor use, and profitability. Compared to farmers’ practice, herbicide-based IWM options with mefenacet + bensulfuron-methyl as preemergence followed by (fb) either bispyribac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence fb one hand-weeding were the most profitable alternatives, with reductions in labor requirement by 11 to 25 person-days ha –1 and in total weed control cost by US$44 to 94 ha –1 , resulting in net returns increases by US$54 to 77 ha –1 without compromising on grain yield. In contrast, IWM options with bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence application fb one hand-weeding reduced yields by 12% to 13% and profits by US$71 to 190 ha –1 . The nonchemical option with mechanical weeding fb one hand-weeding performed similarly to farmers’ practice on yield and profitability. We suggest additional research to develop feasible herbicide-free approaches to weed management in transplanted rice that can offer competitive advantages to current practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence mefenacet plus bensulfuron-methyl followed by bispyribac-sodium and hand-weeding reduced rice weed-control labor by 11 to 25 person-days per hectare versus farmer practice.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
mefenacet + bensulfuron-methyl as preemergence followed by (fb) either bispyribac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence fb one hand-weedinge0
Outcome
labor requiremente0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
11 to 25 person-days ha –1e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“herbicide-based IWM options with mefenacet + bensulfuron-methyl as preemergence followed by (fb) either bispyribac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence fb one hand-weeding were the most profitable alternatives, with reductions in labor requirement by 11 to 25 person-days ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leading herbicide-based IWM options reduced rice weed-control cost by US$44 to 94 per hectare.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
herbicide-based IWM optionse1
Outcome
total weed control coste1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
US$44 to 94 ha –1e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“in total weed control cost by US$44 to 94 ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1152 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ practice, herbicide-based IWM options with mefenacet + bensulfuron-methyl as preemergence followed by (fb) either bispyribac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence fb one hand-weeding were the most profitable alternatives, with reductions in labor requirement by 11 to 25 person-days ha –1 and in total weed control cost by US$44 to 94 ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leading herbicide-based IWM options increased net returns by US$54 to 77 per hectare.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
herbicide-based IWM optionse1
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasese0
Value
US$54 to 77 ha –1e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in net returns increases by US$54 to 77 ha –1 without compromising on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ practice, herbicide-based IWM options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leading herbicide-based IWM options maintained rice grain yield.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
herbicide-based IWM optionse1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
without compromisinge0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“without compromising on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ practice, herbicide-based IWM options”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam followed by hand-weeding reduced rice yield by 12% to 13%.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence application fb one hand-weedinge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12% to 13%e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“IWM options with bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence application fb one hand-weeding reduced yields by 12% to 13% and profits by US$71 to 190 ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam followed by hand-weeding reduced rice profits by US$71 to 190 per hectare.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence application fb one hand-weedinge0
Outcome
profitse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
US$71 to 190 ha –1e0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee1

Verbatim

e0

“IWM options with bispyrbac-sodium or penoxsulam as postemergence application fb one hand-weeding reduced yields by 12% to 13% and profits by US$71 to 190 ha –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1420 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to farmers’ practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical weeding followed by hand-weeding gave similar rice yield and profitability to farmer practice.

Taxon
transplanted ricet0
Treatment
mechanical weeding fb one hand-weedinge0
Outcome
yield and profitabilitye0
Direction
similarlye0
Comparator
farmers’ practicee0

Verbatim

e0

“The nonchemical option with mechanical weeding fb one hand-weeding performed similarly to farmers’ practice on yield and profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend more research on feasible herbicide-free weed management for transplanted rice.

Taxon
transplanted ricee0
Outcome
additional research to develop feasible herbicide-free approaches to weed managemente0

Verbatim

e0

“We suggest additional research to develop feasible herbicide-free approaches to weed management in transplanted rice that can offer competitive advantages to current practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1735 · show in text ↑

Penoxsulam · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

87 papers: 75 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.