Paper · 2020 · Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tarım ve Doğa Dergisi

Effects of Genotype, Sowing Time and Seed Fungicide Pre-Treatments on Root and Crown Rot and Grain Yield in Bread Wheat

İsmet BAŞER; İlker GİDER; Oğuz BİLGİN; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effects of sowing time, cultivar and seed fungicide applications on root and crown rot disease and grain yield of bread wheat with different earliness traits (Esperia, mid-early; Genesi, late and Anapo, early) in the experiment station of the Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University. Four different fungicides pre-treatments (prothioconazole + tebuconazole, carboxin + thiram, prochloraz + tiriticonazole and control) were applied to the seeds of the varieties before sowing in three different times, on 1 November, 15 November and 30 November 2016. The experiment was designed as a split-split-plot with 3 replications. The results of the variance analysis showed that the effect of applying different seed fungicide pre-treatment root and crown rot of bread wheat varieties was statistically significant. Prothioconazole + tebuconazole application caused the lowest root and crown rot with 2.714 %, followed by prochloraz + tiriticonazole with 3.31%. The highest root and crown rot was determined with a value of 3.64% for the earliest sowing on 01 November. Among the four different fungicide pre-treatments, the highest root and crown rot (5.59%) was obtained in the control application, while the lowest root and crown rot was obtained in prothioconazole + tebuconazole, carboxin + thiram and prochloraz + triticonazole, with 1.96%, 2.10% and 2.89% root and crown rot, respectively. These data indicate that early sowing may increase root and crown rot severity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed fungicide pretreatment significantly affected root and crown rot.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
seed fungicide pre-treatmente0
Outcome
root and crown rote0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of applying different seed fungicide pre-treatment root and crown rot of bread wheat varieties was statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prothioconazole plus tebuconazole produced the lowest rot at 2.714%.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Prothioconazole + tebuconazolee0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.714 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prothioconazole + tebuconazole application caused the lowest root and crown rot with 2.714 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–988 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz plus tiriticonazole produced 3.31% rot.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
prochloraz + tiriticonazolee0
Outcome
prochloraz + tiriticonazolee0
Value
3.31%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by prochloraz + tiriticonazole with 3.31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earliest sowing had highest rot at 3.64%.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
earliest sowing on 01 Novembere0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.64%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest root and crown rot was determined with a value of 3.64% for the earliest sowing on 01 November”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had highest rot at 5.59%.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest root and crown rot (5.59%) was obtained in the control application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prothioconazole plus tebuconazole gave 1.96% rot.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
prothioconazole + tebuconazolee0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Value
1.96%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prothioconazole + tebuconazole, carboxin + thiram and prochloraz + triticonazole, with 1.96%, 2.10% and 2.89% root and crown rot, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carboxin plus thiram gave 2.10% rot.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
carboxin + thirame0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Value
2.10%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prothioconazole + tebuconazole, carboxin + thiram and prochloraz + triticonazole, with 1.96%, 2.10% and 2.89% root and crown rot, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prochloraz plus triticonazole gave 2.89% rot.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
prochloraz + triticonazolee0
Outcome
root and crown rote0
Value
2.89%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“prothioconazole + tebuconazole, carboxin + thiram and prochloraz + triticonazole, with 1.96%, 2.10% and 2.89% root and crown rot, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing may increase rot severity.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
early sowinge0
Outcome
root and crown rot severitye0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“early sowing may increase root and crown rot severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1555 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–119 · show in text ↑

prochloraz · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

prothioconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

triticonazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

thiram · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

carboxin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.