Abstract
Abstract Triallate [S ‐ (2, 3, 3‐trichloroallyl) diisopropylthiocar‐bamate] must be applied and incorporated shallowly (2 to 3 cm) postplant to prevent wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) injury; however, deeper incorporation (6 to 10 cm) has given more consistent wild oat ( Avena fatua L.) control. Antidotes which would increase the tolerance of wheat to triallate would allow preplant applications with deep soil incorporation for more consistent wild oat control. Research was conducted in the glasshouse with greenhouse potting soil (2:1:1 v/v/v Fargo silty clay, sand, and compost) or in the field on a Fargo silty clay (fine montmorillonitic, frigid, vertic Haplaquolls) to determine the effectiveness of several antidotes for increasing wheat tolerance to triallate. Treatment of the wheat seed with N, N‐diallyl‐2, 2‐dichloroacetanilide (R25788), 1, 8, napthalic anhydride (NA) or carboxin (5, 6‐dihydro‐2‐methyl‐1, 4‐oxathin‐3‐carboxanilide) increased tolerance of wheat to triallate in both the glasshouse and the field. R‐25788 and carboxin were more effective antidotes than NA with triallate. Applications of R‐25788 and 2, 2‐dimethyl 3‐dichloroacetyl‐oxazolidine (R‐28725) in combination with triallate and seed treatment with 4‐chloro‐2‐hydroxyminoacetanilide (S‐449) or R‐28725 were ineffective antidotes against triallate injury to wheat. This research indicates that R‐25788 or carboxin as seed treatments increased wheat tolerance sufficiently to allow preplant applications of 0.8 kg/ha triallate without injury.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with R25788 increased wheat tolerance to triallate in the glasshouse and the field.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Treatment of the wheat seed with N, N‐diallyl‐2, 2‐dichloroacetanilide (R25788)e1
- Outcome
- tolerance of wheat to triallatee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- glasshouse and the fielde1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Treatment of the wheat seed with N, N‐diallyl‐2, 2‐dichloroacetanilide (R25788), 1, 8, napthalic anhydride (NA) or carboxin (5, 6‐dihydro‐2‐methyl‐1, 4‐oxathin‐3‐carboxanilide) increased tolerance of wheat to triallate in both the glasshouse and the field”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with napthalic anhydride (NA) increased wheat tolerance to triallate in the glasshouse and the field.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 1, 8, napthalic anhydride (NA)e1
- Outcome
- tolerance of wheat to triallatee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- glasshouse and the fielde1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Treatment of the wheat seed with N, N‐diallyl‐2, 2‐dichloroacetanilide (R25788), 1, 8, napthalic anhydride (NA) or carboxin (5, 6‐dihydro‐2‐methyl‐1, 4‐oxathin‐3‐carboxanilide) increased tolerance of wheat to triallate in both the glasshouse and the field”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with carboxin increased wheat tolerance to triallate in the glasshouse and the field.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- carboxin (5, 6‐dihydro‐2‐methyl‐1, 4‐oxathin‐3‐carboxanilide)e1
- Outcome
- tolerance of wheat to triallatee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Setting
- glasshouse and the fielde1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Treatment of the wheat seed with N, N‐diallyl‐2, 2‐dichloroacetanilide (R25788), 1, 8, napthalic anhydride (NA) or carboxin (5, 6‐dihydro‐2‐methyl‐1, 4‐oxathin‐3‐carboxanilide) increased tolerance of wheat to triallate in both the glasshouse and the field”
Claim · model-written summary
R‐25788 and carboxin were more effective antidotes against triallate injury than NA.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- R‐25788 and carboxine2
- Outcome
- effective antidotese2
- Direction
- more effectivee2
- Comparator
- NAe2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“to prevent wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) injury”
e2“R‐25788 and carboxin were more effective antidotes than NA with triallate”
Claim · model-written summary
Applications of R‐25788 and R‐28725 with triallate were ineffective antidotes against triallate injury to wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- Applications of R‐25788 and 2, 2‐dimethyl 3‐dichloroacetyl‐oxazolidine (R‐28725) in combination with triallatee3
- Outcome
- triallate injury to wheate3
- Direction
- ineffectivee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Applications of R‐25788 and 2, 2‐dimethyl 3‐dichloroacetyl‐oxazolidine (R‐28725) in combination with triallate and seed treatment with 4‐chloro‐2‐hydroxyminoacetanilide (S‐449) or R‐28725 were ineffective antidotes against triallate injury to wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with S‐449 or R‐28725 was an ineffective antidote against triallate injury to wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- seed treatment with 4‐chloro‐2‐hydroxyminoacetanilide (S‐449) or R‐28725e3
- Outcome
- triallate injury to wheate3
- Direction
- ineffectivee3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Applications of R‐25788 and 2, 2‐dimethyl 3‐dichloroacetyl‐oxazolidine (R‐28725) in combination with triallate and seed treatment with 4‐chloro‐2‐hydroxyminoacetanilide (S‐449) or R‐28725 were ineffective antidotes against triallate injury to wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed treatment with R‐25788 or carboxin supports preplant triallate application at 0.8 kg/ha without wheat injury.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- R‐25788 or carboxin as seed treatmentse4
- Outcome
- preplant applications of 0.8 kg/ha triallate without injurye4
- Value
- 0.8 kg/hae4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“This research indicates that R‐25788 or carboxin as seed treatments increased wheat tolerance sufficiently to allow preplant applications of 0.8 kg/ha triallate without injury”
The same questions in other papers
Tri-allate · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
carboxin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →seed treatment · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.