Paper · 2020 · Agronomy Journal

Do soil test levels and fertilization with phosphorus and potassium impact field crop tissue concentrations?

Phoo Pye Zone; Steve W. Culman; Van R. Haden; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Soil testing and plant tissue nutrient concentrations form the basis for fertilizer recommendations in Ohio. The response of crop phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) nutrient concentrations to soil test levels and fertilizer applications influences fertilizer recommendations but have not been rigorously evaluated in this region. The objective of our study was to determine the effects of (a) soil test P and K levels and (b) P and K fertilization on mid‐season leaf and grain P and K concentrations of corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). From 2014–2018, we conducted 186 on‐farm trials (99 P, 87 K trials) over a diversity of soil types, crop genetics, and management histories in 39 counties throughout Ohio. Soil test P and K levels, mid‐season leaf P and K concentrations, and grain P and K concentrations were measured on randomized and replicated plots. Both leaf and grain nutrient concentrations generally increased with the soil test levels, but the relationships were weak in all three crops. Fertilization of P and K marginally but consistently increased leaf tissue concentrations in all crops but had a lesser effect on grain P and K concentrations. Our data suggest that current sufficiency ranges for corn, soybean, and wheat are too high and need revision. Collectively, our results show that crop P and K tissue concentrations are positively, but weakly related to soil test levels and fertilization, and this information has important implications for future development of nutrient management frameworks in Ohio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and grain nutrient concentrations generally increased with soil test levels, but weakly.

Taxon
corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Glycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Outcome
leaf and grain nutrient concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
soil test levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both leaf and grain nutrient concentrations generally increased with the soil test levels, but the relationships were weak in all three crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1064 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K fertilization marginally increased leaf tissue nutrients.

Taxon
corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Glycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
Fertilization of P and Ke0
Outcome
leaf tissue concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization of P and K marginally but consistently increased leaf tissue concentrations in all crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1167 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P and K fertilization had a lesser effect on grain nutrients.

Taxon
corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)Glycine maxTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
Fertilization of P and Ke0
Outcome
grain P and K concentrationse0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
leaf tissue concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilization of P and K marginally but consistently increased leaf tissue concentrations in all crops but had a lesser effect on grain P and K concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1224 · show in text ↑
e1

“corn ( Zea mays L.), soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–599 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend revising crop sufficiency ranges downward.

Outcome
sufficiency rangese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“current sufficiency ranges for corn, soybean, and wheat are too high and need revision”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1333 · show in text ↑

potassium · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

96 papers: 74 positive, 22 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 107 positive, 17 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

244 papers: 190 positive, 54 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

240 papers more in this group

See all 244 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

310 papers: 265 positive, 45 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

306 papers more in this group

See all 310 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.