Paper · 1975 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Nutrient Dilution—Antagonism Effects in Corn and Snap Beans in Relation to Rate and Source of Applied Potassium

G. L. Terman; S. E. Allen; B. N. Bradford

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Greenhouse pot experiments were conducted to compare responses of corn ( Zea mays L.) and snap beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to 0 to 1,600 mg of K/pot as KNO 3 , KCl, and K 2 SO 4 on K‐deficient soils (3 kg of soil/pot). Marked responses were obtained to applied K, which were similar among sources, except for a toxic salt effect of 1,600 mg of K as KCl. Marked reciprocal K‐N, K‐P, K‐Ca, and K‐Mg relationships with yield response to rates of applied K were attributed to both dilution and ion antagonism. The latter was most pronounced at higher K rates giving little or no additional yield response and resulting in decreased Ca, Mg, or P uptake. There was a close relationship between total N and total cation concentrations in corn leaves but not in bean leaves. This difference is attributed to absorption of much of the N as NO 3 ‐N by corn and as biologically fixed NH 2 ‐N by snap beans.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied potassium produced marked responses in corn and snap beans, similar across sources.

Treatment
applied Ke0
Outcome
responsese0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Marked responses were obtained to applied K, which were similar among sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn and Snap Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest KCl rate caused a toxic salt effect.

Taxon
Corn and Snap Beanst0
Treatment
1,600 mg of K as KCle0
Outcome
toxic salt effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“a toxic salt effect of 1,600 mg of K as KCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn and Snap Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher K rates produced little or no additional yield response.

Taxon
Corn and Snap Beanst0
Treatment
higher K ratese0
Outcome
yield responsee0
Direction
little or no additionale0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher K rates giving little or no additional yield response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn and Snap Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher K rates decreased calcium, magnesium, or phosphorus uptake.

Taxon
Corn and Snap Beanst0
Treatment
higher K ratese0
Outcome
Ca, Mg, or P uptakee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher K rates giving little or no additional yield response and resulting in decreased Ca, Mg, or P uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn and Snap Beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen and total cation concentrations were closely related in corn leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
total N and total cation concentrationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a close relationship between total N and total cation concentrations in corn leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–754 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The total nitrogen–cation relationship was absent in bean leaves.

Taxon
beane0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
bean leavese0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“but not in bean leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–777 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

37 papers: 28 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

96 papers: 74 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Omission of K decreased shoot K, Ca, Mg, P, and S relative to complete nutrient solution.

    Macronutrient deficiency in snap bean considering physiological, nutritional, and growth aspects · 2020 · compared with plants grown in the complete nutrient solution

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 291 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

316 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.