Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Phosphorus acquisition and wheat growth are influenced by shoot phosphorus status and soil phosphorus distribution in a split‐root system

Qifu Ma; Zed Rengel

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
29
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Root proliferation and greater uptake per unit of root in the nutrient‐rich zones are often considered to be compensatory responses. This study aimed to examine the influence of plant phosphorus (P) status and P distribution in the root zone on root P acquisition and root and shoot growth of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in a split‐root soil culture. One compartment (A) was supplied with either 4 or 14 mg P (kg soil) –1 , whereas the adjoining compartment (B) had 4 mg P kg –1 with a vertical high‐P strip (44 mg kg –1 ) at 90–110 mm from the plant. Three weeks after growing in the split‐root system, plants with 4 mg P kg –1 (low‐P plants) started to show stimulatory root growth in the high‐P strip. Two weeks later, root dry weight and length density in the high‐P strip were significantly greater for the low‐P plants than for the plants with 14 mg P (kg soil) –1 . However, after 8 weeks of growth in the split‐root system, the two P treatments of compartment A had similar root growth in the high‐P strip of compartment B. The study also showed that shoot P concentrations in the low‐P plants were 0.6–0.8 mg g –1 compared with 1.7–1.9 mg g –1 in the 14 mg P kg –1 plants after 3 and 5 weeks of growth, but were similar (1.1–1.4 mg g –1 ) between the two plants by week 8. The low‐P plants had lower root P concentration in both compartments than those with 14 mg P kg –1 throughout the three harvests. The findings may indicate that root proliferation and P acquisition under heterogeneous conditions are influenced by shoot P status (internal) and soil P distribution (external). There were no differences in the total root and shoot dry weight between the two P treatments at weeks 3 and 5 because enhanced root growth and P uptake in the high‐P strip by the low‐P plants were compensated by reduced root growth elsewhere. In contrast, total plant growth and total root and shoot P contents were greater in the 14 mg P kg – 1 soil than in the low‐P soil at week 8. The two P treatments did not affect the ratio of root to shoot dry weight with time. The results suggest that root proliferation and greater P uptake in the P‐enriched zone may meet the demand for P by P‐deficient plants only for a limited period of time.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-P wheat began stimulated root growth in the enriched strip after three weeks.

Treatment
4 mg P kg –1e0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
stimulatorye0
Setting
high‐P stripe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three weeks after growing in the split‐root system, plants with 4 mg P kg –1 (low‐P plants) started to show stimulatory root growth in the high‐P strip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At five weeks, root dry weight and length density in the high-P strip were greater for low-P plants.

Treatment
low‐P plantse0
Outcome
root dry weight and length densitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plants with 14 mg P (kg soil) –1e0
Setting
high‐P stripe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight and length density in the high‐P strip were significantly greater for the low‐P plants than for the plants with 14 mg P (kg soil) –1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At eight weeks, the treatments had similar root growth in the high-P strip.

Treatment
two P treatments of compartment Ae0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after 8 weeks of growth in the split‐root system, the two P treatments of compartment A had similar root growth in the high‐P strip of compartment B”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P was lower in low-P than higher-P wheat at weeks three and five.

Treatment
low‐P plantse0
Outcome
shoot P concentrationse0
Value
0.6–0.8 mg g –1e0
Qualifier
1.7–1.9 mg g –1e0
Comparator
14 mg P kg –1 plantse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot P concentrations in the low‐P plants were 0.6–0.8 mg g –1 compared with 1.7–1.9 mg g –1 in the 14 mg P kg –1 plants after 3 and 5 weeks of growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot P was similar between treatments by week eight.

Treatment
two plantse0
Outcome
similar (1.1–1.4 mg g –1 )e0
Direction
similare0
Value
1.1–1.4 mg g –1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were similar (1.1–1.4 mg g –1 ) between the two plants by week 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1291 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-P plants had lower root P concentrations in both compartments across harvests.

Treatment
low‐P plantse0
Outcome
root P concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
those with 14 mg P kg –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The low‐P plants had lower root P concentration in both compartments than those with 14 mg P kg –1 throughout the three harvests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1421 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root and shoot dry weights were similar between P treatments at weeks three and five.

Treatment
two P treatmentse0
Outcome
total root and shoot dry weighte0
Direction
no differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no differences in the total root and shoot dry weight between the two P treatments at weeks 3 and 5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced growth and P uptake in the enriched strip were offset by reduced growth elsewhere.

Outcome
enhanced root growth and P uptake in the high‐P stripe0
Qualifier
compensated by reduced root growth elsewheree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced root growth and P uptake in the high‐P strip by the low‐P plants were compensated by reduced root growth elsewhere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1721–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total plant growth was greater in high-P soil at week eight.

Treatment
14 mg P kg – 1 soile0
Outcome
total plant growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
low‐P soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total plant growth and total root and shoot P contents were greater in the 14 mg P kg – 1 soil than in the low‐P soil at week 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1986 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root and shoot P contents were greater in high-P soil at week eight.

Treatment
14 mg P kg – 1 soile0
Outcome
total root and shoot P contentse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
low‐P soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total plant growth and total root and shoot P contents were greater in the 14 mg P kg – 1 soil than in the low‐P soil at week 8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1986 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P treatments did not affect root-to-shoot dry-weight ratio over time.

Treatment
two P treatmentse0
Outcome
ratio of root to shoot dry weighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two P treatments did not affect the ratio of root to shoot dry weight with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1988–2071 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested enriched-zone root proliferation and P uptake meet deficient plants’ demand only temporarily.

Outcome
meet the demand for P by P‐deficient plantse0
Qualifier
only for a limited period of timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root proliferation and greater P uptake in the P‐enriched zone may meet the demand for P by P‐deficient plants only for a limited period of time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2098–2242 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 158 positive, 35 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.