Paper · 2008 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Zinc bioavailability in wheat grain in relation to phosphorus fertiliser, crop sequence and mycorrhizal fungi

Megan H Ryan; Jennifer K McInerney; Ian R Record; et al.

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
136
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: While human diets are often deficient in zinc (Zn), the impacts of crop management on Zn in cereal grains are rarely examined. In this study the effect of phosphorus (P) fertiliser and crop sequence (wheat following canola, linola, fallow or pasture) on wheat grain Zn concentration and bioavailability for humans was investigated. RESULTS: The Zn concentration of wheat grain decreased by 33–39% in response to P fertiliser. It was also 30–40% lower for crops following canola and fallow than for those following linola and pasture. P fertiliser decreased the colonisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in wheat roots, and canola and fallow led to lower colonisation than linola and pasture. Since AMF are known to assist in soil uptake of immobile nutrients such as Zn, it is hypothesised that P fertiliser and crop sequence affected grain Zn concentration through AMF. P fertiliser also increased the concentrations of grain P by 17% and grain phytic acid (PA) by 19%, but had little effect on the concentrations of calcium (Ca), iron (Fe) and polyphenols. Other impacts of crop sequence were slightly higher concentrations in grain of P after pasture and Fe after canola. The bioavailability of grain Zn, as shown by the PA:Zn and Ca × PA:Zn molar ratios, mostly reflected Zn concentration and was low in all treatments. After milling, the PA:Zn molar ratio suggested low Zn bioavailability for flour from wheat grown with P fertiliser after canola or fallow. CONCLUSION: Crop management can affect the bioavailability of Zn in wheat grain, with practices leading to high yields potentially leading to low Zn bioavailability. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer decreased wheat grain zinc concentration by 33–39%.

Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
Zn concentration of wheat graine0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33–39%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn concentration of wheat grain decreased by 33–39% in response to P fertiliser.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–446 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following canola had lower grain zinc than wheat following linola and pasture.

Treatment
following canolae0
Outcome
Zn concentratione1
Direction
lowere0
Value
30–40%e0
Comparator
following linola and pasturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was also 30–40% lower for crops following canola and fallow than for those following linola and pasture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Zn concentration of wheat grain decreased by 33–39% in response to P fertiliser.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following fallow had lower grain zinc than wheat following linola and pasture.

Treatment
fallowe0
Outcome
Zn concentratione1
Direction
lowere0
Value
30–40%e0
Comparator
following linola and pasturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was also 30–40% lower for crops following canola and fallow than for those following linola and pasture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Zn concentration of wheat grain decreased by 33–39% in response to P fertiliser.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer decreased AMF colonization of wheat roots.

Treatment
P fertilisere0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e0symbiont
Outcome
colonisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in wheat rootse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertiliser decreased the colonisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–647 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola and fallow sequences yielded lower AMF colonization than linola and pasture.

Treatment
canola and fallowe0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)e1symbiont
Outcome
colonisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in wheat rootse1
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
linola and pasturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“canola and fallow led to lower colonisation than linola and pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–720 · show in text ↑
e1

“colonisation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in wheat roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–647 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors hypothesize that fertilizer and sequence act on grain zinc through AMF.

Treatment
P fertiliser and crop sequencee0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is hypothesised that P fertiliser and crop sequence affected grain Zn concentration through AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased grain phosphorus concentration by 17%.

Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
concentrations of grain Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertiliser also increased the concentrations of grain P by 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer increased grain phytic acid concentration by 19%.

Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
grain phytic acid (PA)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertiliser also increased the concentrations of grain P by 17% and grain phytic acid (PA) by 19%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P fertilizer had little effect on grain calcium, iron and polyphenols.

Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
concentrations of calcium (Ca), iron (Fe) and polyphenolse0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P fertiliser also increased the concentrations of grain P by 17% and grain phytic acid (PA) by 19%, but had little effect on the concentrations of calcium (Ca), iron (Fe) and polyphenols.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasture preceding wheat slightly raised grain phosphorus.

Treatment
after pasturee0
Outcome
concentrations in grain of Pe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“slightly higher concentrations in grain of P after pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola preceding wheat slightly raised grain iron.

Treatment
after canolae1
Outcome
Fee1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe after canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1203 · show in text ↑
e1

“slightly higher concentrations in grain of P after pasture and Fe after canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc bioavailability was low in all treatments.

Outcome
bioavailability of grain Zne0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bioavailability of grain Zn, as shown by the PA:Zn and Ca × PA:Zn molar ratios, mostly reflected Zn concentration and was low in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain zinc bioavailability mostly reflected zinc concentration.

Compound
Zn concentratione0
Outcome
bioavailability of grain Zne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The bioavailability of grain Zn, as shown by the PA:Zn and Ca × PA:Zn molar ratios, mostly reflected Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1322 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled flour from fertilized wheat after canola showed low zinc bioavailability.

Organ / stage
floure0
Treatment
P fertiliser after canolae0
Outcome
Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After milling, the PA:Zn molar ratio suggested low Zn bioavailability for flour from wheat grown with P fertiliser after canola or fallow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1492 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Milled flour from fertilized wheat after fallow showed low zinc bioavailability.

Organ / stage
floure0
Treatment
P fertilisere0
Outcome
Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
lowe0
Qualifier
fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After milling, the PA:Zn molar ratio suggested low Zn bioavailability for flour from wheat grown with P fertiliser after canola or fallow.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1492 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude high yield practices may lower grain zinc bioavailability.

Treatment
practices leading to high yieldse0
Outcome
Zn bioavailabilitye0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“practices leading to high yields potentially leading to low Zn bioavailability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

fertilization · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 98 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 98 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 232 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 854 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.