Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of phosphorus, sulphur and 'zinc on growth, yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

G.S. DEWAL; R.G. PAREEK

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabl) season of 1999-2000 and 2000-2001 at Jobner, to study the effect of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc on wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). Pooled analysis revealed that the growth parameters, yield attributes, yield, net return and benefit : cost ratio increased significantly with application of 40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlha. In general, nutrient uptake increased up to highest level of P, S and Zn, except that P uptake was reduced at highest level of zinc and Zn uptake was reduced at highest level of phosphorus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth parameters and yield attributes increased significantly with the stated fertilizer application.

Treatment
40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlhae0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth parameters, yield attributes, yield, net return and benefit : cost ratio increased significantly with application of 40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 243–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased significantly with the stated fertilizer application.

Treatment
40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlhae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield, net return and benefit : cost ratio increased significantly with application of 40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Net return and benefit-cost ratio increased significantly with the stated fertilizer application.

Treatment
40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlhae0
Outcome
net return and benefit : cost ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return and benefit : cost ratio increased significantly with application of 40 kg P,O, 40 kg S and 5 kg Znlha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–400 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake generally increased up to the highest fertilizer levels.

Treatment
P, S and Zne0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nutrient uptake increased up to highest level of P, S and Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P uptake was reduced at the highest zinc level.

Treatment
highest level of zince0
Outcome
P uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P uptake was reduced at highest level of zinc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn uptake was reduced at the highest phosphorus level.

Treatment
highest level of phosphoruse0
Outcome
Zn uptakee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn uptake was reduced at highest level of phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–85 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.