Paper · 2018 · Journal of Plant Production

An Attempt to Mitigation of Irrigation Water Deficit Stress in Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants by Phosphorus Fertilizer

E. E. Metwaly

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This investigation was carried in order to elucidate the response of pea (cv. Master pea) to various levels of Phosphorus fertilizer, i.e 45, 60, 75 and 90 kg as P2O5 /fed. under three levels of irrigation water deficit (100% of common irrigation as control, moderate stress 75 % of common irrigation and severe stress 50 % of the common irrigation). Therefore, two field experiments were conducted in the Experimental Station, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University during 2015 and 2016 in winter seasons. The results indicated that vegetative growth characters (plant height, plant fresh weight, branches number, leaves fresh weight, leaves number and leaves area) per plant, leaves chemical composition (N, P, K and chlorophyll pigments), pods yield and its quality (pods weight per plant, pods number per plant, seeds fresh weight per plant, 100 seeds fresh weight, seeds dry weight yield and pods yield per fed., Vit. C and TSS) and plant water relations (leaf relative water content and leaf membrane stability index) were decreased by increasing of irrigation water deficit. On the contrast, leaves and seeds dry matter % were increased by increasing of irrigation water deficit. On the other hand, water use efficiency is not affected with irrigation water deficit. With respect to the effect of phosphorus fertilizer rates, the data show that, the mentioned attributes were increased up to 60 kg as P2O5 /fed then declined at and 75 kg as P2O5 /fed. On the other hand, 45 kg as P2O5 /fed gave the lowest values for most effective mentioned parameters. As for the interaction between irrigation water deficit and Phosphorus fertilizer rates showed that common irrigation and 60 kg as P2O5 /fed combination recorded the maximum values for more effective mentioned characters. In addition, results showed that common irrigation or moderate stress treatments with Phosphorus fertilizer rates had insignificant differences for most effective previous parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit reduced pea vegetative growth traits.

Treatment
increasing of irrigation water deficite0
Outcome
vegetative growth characters (plant height, plant fresh weight, branches number, leaves fresh weight, leaves number and leaves area)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vegetative growth characters (plant height, plant fresh weight, branches number, leaves fresh weight, leaves number and leaves area) per plant, leaves chemical composition (N, P, K and chlorophyll pigments), pods yield and its quality (pods weight per plant, pods number per plant, seeds fresh weight per plant, 100 seeds fresh weight, seeds dry weight yield and pods yield per fed., Vit. C and TSS) and plant water relations (leaf relative water content and leaf membrane stability index) were decreased by increasing of irrigation water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit reduced leaf chemical composition measures.

Treatment
increasing of irrigation water deficite0
Outcome
leaves chemical composition (N, P, K and chlorophyll pigments)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaves chemical composition (N, P, K and chlorophyll pigments), pods yield and its quality (pods weight per plant, pods number per plant, seeds fresh weight per plant, 100 seeds fresh weight, seeds dry weight yield and pods yield per fed., Vit. C and TSS) and plant water relations (leaf relative water content and leaf membrane stability index) were decreased by increasing of irrigation water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit reduced pod and seed yield and quality measures.

Treatment
increasing of irrigation water deficite0
Outcome
pods yield and its quality (pods weight per plant, pods number per plant, seeds fresh weight per plant, 100 seeds fresh weight, seeds dry weight yield and pods yield per fed., Vit. C and TSS)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pods yield and its quality (pods weight per plant, pods number per plant, seeds fresh weight per plant, 100 seeds fresh weight, seeds dry weight yield and pods yield per fed., Vit. C and TSS) and plant water relations (leaf relative water content and leaf membrane stability index) were decreased by increasing of irrigation water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation deficit reduced leaf water content and membrane stability.

Treatment
increasing of irrigation water deficite0
Outcome
leaf relative water content and leaf membrane stability indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant water relations (leaf relative water content and leaf membrane stability index) were decreased by increasing of irrigation water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf and seed dry matter percentage rose with increasing irrigation deficit.

Treatment
increasing of irrigation water deficite0
Outcome
leaves and seeds dry matter %e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaves and seeds dry matter % were increased by increasing of irrigation water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency was unaffected by irrigation deficit.

Treatment
irrigation water deficite0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water use efficiency is not affected with irrigation water deficit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Studied attributes increased up to 60 kg as P2O5 /fed and declined at 75 kg as P2O5 /fed.

Treatment
60 kg as P2O5 /fede0
Outcome
mentioned attributese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
75 kg as P2O5 /fede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mentioned attributes were increased up to 60 kg as P2O5 /fed then declined at and 75 kg as P2O5 /fed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45 kg phosphorus rate gave the lowest values for most measured parameters.

Treatment
45 kg as P2O5 /fede0
Outcome
most effective mentioned parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“45 kg as P2O5 /fed gave the lowest values for most effective mentioned parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Common irrigation with 60 kg phosphorus gave maximum values for most measured traits.

Treatment
common irrigation and 60 kg as P2O5 /fed combinatione0
Outcome
more effective mentioned characterse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common irrigation and 60 kg as P2O5 /fed combination recorded the maximum values for more effective mentioned characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Common irrigation and moderate stress with phosphorus did not significantly differ for most parameters.

Treatment
moderate stress treatments with Phosphorus fertilizer ratese0
Outcome
most effective previous parameterse0
Direction
insignificant differencese0
Comparator
common irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“common irrigation or moderate stress treatments with Phosphorus fertilizer rates had insignificant differences for most effective previous parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1821–1971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pea (Pisum sativum, L) Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–92 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

38 papers: 9 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.