Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi during 1992-94 to study the growth and yield responses of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11) to moisture stress and application of phosphorus, sulphur and zinc. The moisture stress at flowering appeared to be most critical in influencing the yield of pea. Higher values of vine length, leaf area index, dry matter, yield attributes, grain and straw yields, harvest index, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn) and consumptive water use were noticed with no moisture stress treatment. Application of 26.2 kg Plha resulted in marked improvement in growth and yield attributes and yield, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn), consumptive water use, water use efficiency, and soil available P at harvest. The soil available N showed improvement up to 13.1 kg Plha only. Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl ha showed marked improvement in growth and yield attributes, grain and straw yields, nutrient uptake (P, K and Zn), consumptive water use and water use efficiency. The differences between 40 kg Slha and 40 kg S + 5 kg Znlha were not marked in S uptake in both the seasons, and N uptake in 1993-94.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Moisture stress at flowering was the most critical factor for pea yield.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativum
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- moisture stress at floweringe3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Qualifier
- most criticale3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e3“The moisture stress at flowering appeared to be most critical in influencing the yield of pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Without moisture stress, pea vine length, leaf area index and dry matter were higher.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- no moisture stress treatmente2
- Outcome
- vine length, leaf area index, dry mattere2
- Direction
- Highere2
- Setting
- New Delhie1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e1“A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi during 1992-94”
e2“Higher values of vine length, leaf area index, dry matter, yield attributes, grain and straw yields, harvest index, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn) and consumptive water use were noticed with no moisture stress treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Without moisture stress, pea yield attributes, grain and straw yields and harvest index were higher.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- no moisture stress treatmente2
- Outcome
- yield attributes, grain and straw yields, harvest indexe2
- Direction
- Highere2
- Setting
- New Delhie1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e1“A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi during 1992-94”
e2“Higher values of vine length, leaf area index, dry matter, yield attributes, grain and straw yields, harvest index, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn) and consumptive water use were noticed with no moisture stress treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Without moisture stress, pea nutrient uptake and consumptive water use were higher.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- no moisture stress treatmente2
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn) and consumptive water usee2
- Direction
- Highere2
- Setting
- New Delhie1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e1“A field experiment was conducted at New Delhi during 1992-94”
e2“Higher values of vine length, leaf area index, dry matter, yield attributes, grain and straw yields, harvest index, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn) and consumptive water use were noticed with no moisture stress treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
26.2 kg P/ha markedly improved pea growth and yield attributes and yield.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 26.2 kg Plhae4
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes and yielde4
- Direction
- marked improvemente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e4“Application of 26.2 kg Plha resulted in marked improvement in growth and yield attributes and yield, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn), consumptive water use, water use efficiency, and soil available P at harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
26.2 kg P/ha markedly improved pea nutrient uptake of N, P, K and Zn.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 26.2 kg Plhae4
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn)e4
- Direction
- marked improvemente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e4“Application of 26.2 kg Plha resulted in marked improvement in growth and yield attributes and yield, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn), consumptive water use, water use efficiency, and soil available P at harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
26.2 kg P/ha markedly improved consumptive water use, water use efficiency and soil available P at harvest.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 26.2 kg Plhae4
- Outcome
- consumptive water use, water use efficiency, and soil available P at harveste4
- Direction
- marked improvemente4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e4“Application of 26.2 kg Plha resulted in marked improvement in growth and yield attributes and yield, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Zn), consumptive water use, water use efficiency, and soil available P at harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
13.1 kg P/ha was the upper limit for improving soil available N in pea.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 13.1 kg Plhae5
- Outcome
- soil available Ne5
- Direction
- improvemente5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e5“The soil available N showed improvement up to 13.1 kg Plha only”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 40 kg S + 5 kg Zn/ha markedly improved pea growth and yield attributes, grain and straw yields.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl hae6
- Outcome
- growth and yield attributes, grain and straw yieldse6
- Direction
- marked improvemente6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e6“Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl ha showed marked improvement in growth and yield attributes, grain and straw yields, nutrient uptake (P, K and Zn), consumptive water use and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 40 kg S + 5 kg Zn/ha markedly improved pea nutrient uptake of P, K and Zn.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl hae6
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake (P, K and Zn)e6
- Direction
- marked improvemente6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e6“Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl ha showed marked improvement in growth and yield attributes, grain and straw yields, nutrient uptake (P, K and Zn), consumptive water use and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined 40 kg S + 5 kg Zn/ha markedly improved pea consumptive water use and water use efficiency.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl hae6
- Outcome
- consumptive water use and water use efficiencye6
- Direction
- marked improvemente6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e6“Combined application of 40 kg S + 5 kg Znl ha showed marked improvement in growth and yield attributes, grain and straw yields, nutrient uptake (P, K and Zn), consumptive water use and water use efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding Zn to 40 kg S/ha did not change pea S uptake in either season.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 40 kg S + 5 kg Znlhae7
- Outcome
- S uptakee7
- Direction
- not markede7
- Qualifier
- in both the seasonse7
- Comparator
- 40 kg Slhae7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e7“The differences between 40 kg Slha and 40 kg S + 5 kg Znlha were not marked in S uptake in both the seasons, and N uptake in 1993-94”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding Zn to 40 kg S/ha did not change pea N uptake in 1993-94.
- Taxon
- Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- 40 kg S + 5 kg Znlhae7
- Outcome
- N uptakee7
- Direction
- not markede7
- Qualifier
- 1993-94e7
- Comparator
- 40 kg Slhae7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“pea (Pisum sativum L.) cv. Swastik (DMR 11)”
e7“The differences between 40 kg Slha and 40 kg S + 5 kg Znlha were not marked in S uptake in both the seasons, and N uptake in 1993-94”
The same questions in other papers
drought · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →drought · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →drought · physiology: water · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.