Paper · 2015 · Food Technology and Biotechnology

Influence of Yellow Light-Emitting Diodes at 590 nm on Storage of Apple, Tomato and Bell Pepper Fruit

Doris Kokalj; Janez Hribar; Blaž Cigić; et al.

9
claims
11
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the eff ects of irradiation from light-emitt ing diodes (LEDs) on several fruits during storage. To improve storage and increase the contents of some bioactive compounds, apple, tomato and red bell pepper fruits were exposed to yellow light emitt ed from the diodes at 590 nm. The contents of ascorbic acid, total phenolics, total fl avonoids and several pigments were investigated, along with the antioxidant potential. The colour parameters (L*, a* and b*) and fi rmness of the fruit were also determined. Aft er 7 days of LED light irradiation, there was signifi cantly higher total phenolic content and antioxidant potential in apple peel extracts. The irradiated fruit of tomato had signifi cantly higher levels of total phenolic compounds, and the fruit of red bell pepper had signifi cantly higher antioxidant potential. LED light had no eff ects on the colour parameters, although there was a tendency to accelerate colour development. Apple fruit irradiated with LED light was signifi cantly less fi rm. Among twelve analysed pigments, signifi cantly more -carotene was detected in LED light-irradiated apple and bell pepper fruit, more -tocopherol and -tocopherol in bell pepper fruit, and more lutein in apple peel and bell pepper fruit. The applied LED light slightly accelerated the ripening of the studied fruit, and aff ected the synthesis of some of the secondary metabolites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After 7 days of LED irradiation, apple peel extracts had significantly higher total phenolic content and antioxidant potential.

Organ / stage
apple peele1
Treatment
LED light irradiatione1
Outcome
total phenolic content and antioxidant potentiale1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Aft er 7 days of LED light irradiation, there was signifi cantly higher total phenolic content and antioxidant potential in apple peel extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 554–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated tomato fruit had significantly higher total phenolic compounds.

Treatment
irradiatede1
Outcome
total phenolic compoundse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The irradiated fruit of tomato had signifi cantly higher levels of total phenolic compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red bell pepper fruit had significantly higher antioxidant potential after irradiation.

Taxon
red bell peppere1
Outcome
antioxidant potentiale1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e1

“the fruit of red bell pepper had signifi cantly higher antioxidant potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LED light had no effect on colour parameters.

Taxon
Apple, Tomato and Bell Peppert0
Treatment
LED lighte1
Outcome
colour parameterse1
Direction
no eff ectse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“LED light had no eff ects on the colour parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple, Tomato and Bell Pepper Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit irradiated with LED light was significantly less firm.

Treatment
irradiated with LED lighte1
Outcome
fi rme1
Direction
lesse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Apple fruit irradiated with LED light was signifi cantly less fi rm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1057 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More carotene was detected in LED-irradiated apple and bell pepper fruit.

Taxon
apple and bell peppere1
Treatment
LED light-irradiatede1
Outcome
-carotenee1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“more -carotene was detected in LED light-irradiated apple and bell pepper fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated bell pepper fruit had more tocopherols.

Taxon
bell peppere1
Outcome
-tocopherol and -tocopherole1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e1

“more -tocopherol and -tocopherol in bell pepper fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated apple peel and bell pepper fruit had more lutein.

Organ / stage
apple peele1
Outcome
luteine1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“more lutein in apple peel and bell pepper fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The applied LED light slightly accelerated ripening of the fruit.

Taxon
Apple, Tomato and Bell Peppert0
Treatment
applied LED lighte1
Outcome
ripeninge1
Direction
acceleratede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The applied LED light slightly accelerated the ripening of the studied fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple, Tomato and Bell Pepper Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–101 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

23 papers: 13 positive, 10 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

40 papers: 36 positive, 4 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 13 positive, 9 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.