Paper · 2012 · HortScience

Comparative Study of Color, Pungency, and Biochemical Composition in Chili Pepper (Capsicum annuum) Under Different Light-emitting Diode Treatments

Baniekal Hiremath Gangadhar; Raghvendra Kumar Mishra; Gobinath Pandian; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
76
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Color and pungency are the two main factors of chili peppers that determine their quality and final market price. In this study, we investigated the effect of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on fruit color and primary and secondary metabolites (capsaicinoids) in Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of acetonitrile extract of chili fruits revealed enhanced capsaicinoid contents in blue LEDs (180 ± 6.32 mg/100 g) when compared with fluorescent light (54 ± 3.12 mg/100 g). However, color of chili pepper was remarkably changed under different light treatments. Among these, high ASTA color values and chromatic parameters (L*, a*, b*, C*, and H°) were recorded under red plus blue LED, further indicating red plus blue LED is responsible for most vivid color development compared with monochromatic red or blue LEDs. In addition, we found total carbohydrate [22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)], reducing sugars (8.27 mg·g −1 FW), starch (14.05 mg·g –1 FW), carotenoids (6.15 mg·g −1 FW), and protein (4.83 mg·g −1 FW) were significantly high under red plus blue LED. These results showed that there were significant differences of plant growth and production of various metabolites among the different LEDs. Furthermore, blue LED showed a relatively higher rate of capsaicinoid production and red plus blue LED produced striking color development in chili peppers. Therefore, the results presented here might serve as an alternative strategy for nutritional improvement (color, oleoresin, and pungency) of chili peppers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LEDs enhanced capsaicinoid contents compared with fluorescent light.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
blue LEDse1
Outcome
capsaicinoid contentse1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
180 ± 6.32 mg/100 ge1
Comparator
fluorescent lighte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced capsaicinoid contents in blue LEDs (180 ± 6.32 mg/100 g) when compared with fluorescent light (54 ± 3.12 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–514 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different light treatments remarkably changed chili pepper colour.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
different light treatmentse2
Outcome
color of chili peppere2
Direction
remarkably changede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e2

“color of chili pepper was remarkably changed under different light treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED produced high ASTA color values in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe3
Outcome
ASTA color valuese3
Direction
highe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“high ASTA color values and chromatic parameters (L*, a*, b*, C*, and H°) were recorded under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED produced high L*, a*, b* chromatic parameters in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe3
Outcome
L*, a*, b*e3
Direction
highe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“high ASTA color values and chromatic parameters (L*, a*, b*, C*, and H°) were recorded under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED produced high C* and H° chromatic parameters in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe3
Outcome
C*, and H°e3
Direction
highe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“high ASTA color values and chromatic parameters (L*, a*, b*, C*, and H°) were recorded under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED gave the most vivid colour development compared with monochromatic red or blue LEDs.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe4
Outcome
color developmente4
Direction
most vivide4
Comparator
monochromatic red or blue LEDse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e4

“red plus blue LED is responsible for most vivid color development compared with monochromatic red or blue LEDs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED increased total carbohydrate content in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe5
Outcome
total carbohydratee5
Direction
highe5
Value
22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“we found total carbohydrate [22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)], reducing sugars (8.27 mg·g −1 FW), starch (14.05 mg·g –1 FW), carotenoids (6.15 mg·g −1 FW), and protein (4.83 mg·g −1 FW) were significantly high under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED increased reducing sugars in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe5
Outcome
reducing sugarse5
Direction
highe5
Value
8.27 mg·g −1 FWe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“we found total carbohydrate [22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)], reducing sugars (8.27 mg·g −1 FW), starch (14.05 mg·g –1 FW), carotenoids (6.15 mg·g −1 FW), and protein (4.83 mg·g −1 FW) were significantly high under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED increased starch in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe5
Outcome
starche5
Direction
highe5
Value
14.05 mg·g –1 FWe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“we found total carbohydrate [22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)], reducing sugars (8.27 mg·g −1 FW), starch (14.05 mg·g –1 FW), carotenoids (6.15 mg·g −1 FW), and protein (4.83 mg·g −1 FW) were significantly high under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED increased carotenoids in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe5
Outcome
carotenoidse5
Direction
highe5
Value
6.15 mg·g −1 FWe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“we found total carbohydrate [22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)], reducing sugars (8.27 mg·g −1 FW), starch (14.05 mg·g –1 FW), carotenoids (6.15 mg·g −1 FW), and protein (4.83 mg·g −1 FW) were significantly high under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Red plus blue LED increased protein in chili pepper.

Taxon
Capsicum annuumCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
red plus blue LEDe5
Outcome
proteine5
Direction
highe5
Value
4.83 mg·g −1 FWe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Capsicum annuum L. cv. Cheonyang”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“we found total carbohydrate [22.32 mg·g −1 fresh weight (FW)], reducing sugars (8.27 mg·g −1 FW), starch (14.05 mg·g –1 FW), carotenoids (6.15 mg·g −1 FW), and protein (4.83 mg·g −1 FW) were significantly high under red plus blue LED”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1106 · show in text ↑

light · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

light · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

light · physiology: pigments · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.