Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of different wavelengths of LED lighting on the postharvest quality of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Zahide) during breaker harvest stages.. Material and Methods: Harvested tomato fruits were placed on 500 g polystyrene foam dishes and wrapped with stretch film. They then were stored in 4±1ºC temperature and 85-90% relative humidity for 42 days under the red (R), blue (B), green (G) and white (W) LED light conditions. The fruits stored in the dark were used as control (C). Results: R and W LED treatments increased hue angle value, yellowness index value, and fruit firmness of tomatoes Blue LED lighting, also decreased electrolyte leakage that indicates delaying senescence. It was also found that blue and red LED lighting delayed fruit decay. Conclusion: As a conclusion, it could be satated that the blue LED lighting was found to be more effective than the red, white and green LED light in maintaining the quality of the tomatoes harvested at the breaking stage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Red and white LED treatments increased hue angle, yellowness index and fruit firmness.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- R and W LED treatmentse0
- Outcome
- hue angle value, yellowness index value, and fruit firmnesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“R and W LED treatments increased hue angle value, yellowness index value, and fruit firmness of tomatoes”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue LED lighting decreased electrolyte leakage.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Blue LED lightinge0
- Outcome
- electrolyte leakagee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Blue LED lighting, also decreased electrolyte leakage that indicates delaying senescence”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue and red LED lighting delayed fruit decay.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- blue and red LED lightinge0
- Outcome
- fruit decaye0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“blue and red LED lighting delayed fruit decay”
t0“tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged blue LED lighting most effective for maintaining breaker stage tomato quality.
- Taxon
- tomatoes
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Organ / stage
- breaking stagee0
- Treatment
- blue LED lightinge0
- Outcome
- maintaining the qualitye0
- Comparator
- red, white and green LED lighte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“blue LED lighting was found to be more effective than the red, white and green LED light in maintaining the quality of the tomatoes harvested at the breaking stage”
The same questions in other papers
light · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →light · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →light · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.