Paper · 2005 · Xibei Nong-Lin Keji Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue ban

Effect on development of disease severity of Fusarium head blight and grain yield in the wheat treated with fungicides tebuconazole and metconazole

Han Qing-mei

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Tebuconazole and metconazole have been proven to be ideal fungicides for protection and cure of Fusarium head blight of wheat in this studies.The results in greenhouse experiment showed that tebuconazole (3.15 mL/L) and metconazole (3.75 mL/L) were significant for controlling development of Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikes.The control effect was higher than carbendazim.Filed experiments of 2001 showed that treatments with fungicide either 2 days before or 2 days post inoculation,tebuconazole reduced the disease index of the spikes by 80.32% and 70.64%,as well as increased grain yield by 12.95% and 8.74% in comparison to the untreated control.Application of metconazole led to decreases of the disease index by 80.5% and 68.0% and increases of grain yield by 11.41% and 11.45% compared with the untreated plants.In 2002,with the serious occurrence of the head blight,tebuconazole reduced the disease index of the spikes by 76.47% and 78.67% and metconazole reduced the disease index by 82.06% and 81.89% in comparison to the untreated control.The results demonstrated that two fungcides may be substitutes for controlling Fusarium head blight of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole at 3.15 mL/L significantly controlled Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikes in the greenhouse.

Treatment
tebuconazole (3.15 mL/L)e0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
development of Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikese0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole (3.15 mL/L) and metconazole (3.75 mL/L) were significant for controlling development of Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metconazole at 3.75 mL/L significantly controlled Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikes in the greenhouse.

Treatment
metconazole (3.75 mL/L)e0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
development of Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikese0
Direction
controllinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole (3.15 mL/L) and metconazole (3.75 mL/L) were significant for controlling development of Fusarium graminearum on wheat spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fungicides controlled wheat blight more effectively than carbendazim.

Treatment
fungicides tebuconazole and metconazolet0
Outcome
control effecte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
carbendazime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control effect was higher than carbendazim”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–375 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat treated with fungicides tebuconazole and metconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, tebuconazole two days before inoculation reduced wheat spike disease index 80.32% versus untreated control.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease index of the spikese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
80.32%e0
Qualifier
2 days beforee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with fungicide either 2 days before or 2 days post inoculation,tebuconazole reduced the disease index of the spikes by 80.32% and 70.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, tebuconazole two days after inoculation reduced wheat spike disease index 70.64%.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease index of the spikese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
70.64%e0
Qualifier
2 days post inoculatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with fungicide either 2 days before or 2 days post inoculation,tebuconazole reduced the disease index of the spikes by 80.32% and 70.64%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, tebuconazole two days before inoculation increased wheat grain yield 12.95%.

Treatment
tebuconazolet0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.95%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield by 12.95% and 8.74% in comparison to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat treated with fungicides tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, tebuconazole two days after inoculation increased wheat grain yield 8.74%.

Treatment
tebuconazolet0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.74%e0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield by 12.95% and 8.74% in comparison to the untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat treated with fungicides tebuconazole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, metconazole before inoculation reduced wheat disease index 80.5%.

Treatment
metconazolee0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
80.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of metconazole led to decreases of the disease index by 80.5% and 68.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, metconazole after inoculation reduced wheat disease index 68.0%.

Treatment
metconazolee0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
68.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of metconazole led to decreases of the disease index by 80.5% and 68.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, metconazole before inoculation increased wheat grain yield 11.41%.

Treatment
metconazolee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.41%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of metconazole led to decreases of the disease index by 80.5% and 68.0% and increases of grain yield by 11.41% and 11.45% compared with the untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2001, metconazole after inoculation increased wheat grain yield 11.45%.

Treatment
metconazolee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.45%e0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of metconazole led to decreases of the disease index by 80.5% and 68.0% and increases of grain yield by 11.41% and 11.45% compared with the untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, tebuconazole first treatment reduced wheat spike disease index 76.47%.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease index of the spikese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
76.47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole reduced the disease index of the spikes by 76.47% and 78.67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, tebuconazole second treatment reduced wheat spike disease index 78.67%.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Outcome
disease index of the spikese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
78.67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tebuconazole reduced the disease index of the spikes by 76.47% and 78.67%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, metconazole first treatment reduced wheat spike disease index 82.06%.

Treatment
metconazolee0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
82.06%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metconazole reduced the disease index by 82.06% and 81.89%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2002, metconazole second treatment reduced wheat spike disease index 81.89%.

Treatment
metconazolee0
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
81.89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metconazole reduced the disease index by 82.06% and 81.89%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed both fungicides as substitutes for wheat Fusarium head-blight control.

Outcome
substitutes for controlling Fusarium head blight of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two fungcides may be substitutes for controlling Fusarium head blight of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1162 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

metconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tebuconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

metconazole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

metconazole · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

tebuconazole · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

tebuconazole · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

36 papers: 36 positive, 0 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.