Paper · 2008 · Pesticide Research Journal

Utilization of Some Novel Insecticide Schedules in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)

Sinha; Ravendra K. Sharma

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2007 in the vegetable farm of fhe Division of Entomology, IARI, New Delhi in Randomized Block Design with ten treatments including a control. Seed treated with imidacloprid (3 g ai kg−1 seeds) or foliar spray either of thiamethoxam/acetamiprid/imidacloprid @ 20 g ai ha−1 effectively reduced leafhopper population, Amrasca biguttula biguttula. Earias vittella damage among marketable fruits in different treatments ranged from 9.30–15.15% as compared to 22.45% in untreated control. Treatment schedule with 3 foliar sprays viz imidacloprid-bifenthrin - endosulfan was most effective as it gave 9.30% damage followed by imidacloprid seed treatment - endosulfan - endosulfan (9.99%) and thiamethoxam - indoxacarb - indoxacarb (10.30%). The study revealed that seed treated with imidacloprid/foliar spray of nicotinoids viz thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, imidacloprid is successful in managing the leafhopper, while other two follar fortnightly sprays of bifenthrin/alphamethrin/endosulfan or alternatively bifenthrin and endosulfan are successful in managing the borer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid or foliar sprays of thiamethoxam, acetamiprid or imidacloprid reduced leafhopper population.

Treatment
Seed treated with imidacloprid (3 g ai kg−1 seeds)e0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae0pest
Outcome
leafhopper populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed treated with imidacloprid (3 g ai kg−1 seeds) or foliar spray either of thiamethoxam/acetamiprid/imidacloprid @ 20 g ai ha−1 effectively reduced leafhopper population, Amrasca biguttula biguttula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Insecticide schedules in different treatments ranged from 9.30–15.15% Earias vittella damage on marketable fruits, lower than 22.45% in untreated control.

Treatment
different treatmentse1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
Earias vittella damage among marketable fruitse1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
9.30–15.15%e1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earias vittella damage among marketable fruits in different treatments ranged from 9.30–15.15% as compared to 22.45% in untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three foliar sprays of imidacloprid-bifenthrin - endosulfan gave the lowest Earias vittella damage, 9.30%.

Treatment
3 foliar sprays viz imidacloprid-bifenthrin - endosulfane2
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
Earias vittella damagee1
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
9.30%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earias vittella damage among marketable fruits in different treatments ranged from 9.30–15.15% as compared to 22.45% in untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–528 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment schedule with 3 foliar sprays viz imidacloprid-bifenthrin - endosulfan was most effective as it gave 9.30% damage followed by imidacloprid seed treatment - endosulfan - endosulfan (9.99%) and thiamethoxam - indoxacarb - indoxacarb (10.30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid seed treatment followed by endosulfan twice gave Earias vittella damage of 9.99%.

Treatment
imidacloprid seed treatment - endosulfan - endosulfane2
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
Earias vittella damagee1
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
9.99%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earias vittella damage among marketable fruits in different treatments ranged from 9.30–15.15% as compared to 22.45% in untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–528 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment schedule with 3 foliar sprays viz imidacloprid-bifenthrin - endosulfan was most effective as it gave 9.30% damage followed by imidacloprid seed treatment - endosulfan - endosulfan (9.99%) and thiamethoxam - indoxacarb - indoxacarb (10.30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–779 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam - indoxacarb - indoxacarb gave Earias vittella damage of 10.30%.

Treatment
thiamethoxam - indoxacarb - indoxacarbe2
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae1pest
Outcome
Earias vittella damagee1
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
10.30%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Earias vittella damage among marketable fruits in different treatments ranged from 9.30–15.15% as compared to 22.45% in untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–528 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment schedule with 3 foliar sprays viz imidacloprid-bifenthrin - endosulfan was most effective as it gave 9.30% damage followed by imidacloprid seed treatment - endosulfan - endosulfan (9.99%) and thiamethoxam - indoxacarb - indoxacarb (10.30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–779 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatment with imidacloprid or foliar sprays of nicotinoids is successful in managing the leafhopper in okra.

Outcome
managing the leafhoppere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“seed treated with imidacloprid/foliar spray of nicotinoids viz thiamethoxam, acetamiprid, imidacloprid is successful in managing the leafhopper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–948 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two foliar fortnightly sprays of bifenthrin/alphamethrin/endosulfan are successful in managing the borer in okra.

Outcome
managing the borere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Insect Pest Management of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“other two follar fortnightly sprays of bifenthrin/alphamethrin/endosulfan or alternatively bifenthrin and endosulfan are successful in managing the borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1109 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

endosulfan · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

imidacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

indoxacarb · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

imidacloprid · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.