Abstract
An experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of newer combination insecticides against shoot and fruit borer, Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra. Among tested insecticides, indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC @ 400 ml/ ha, profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC @1000 ml/ha and chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC @1000 ml/ha found to be the most effective in reducing the fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basis was 15.65 to 14.80 and 16.25 to 15.24%, respectively as against 32.14 and 31.31%in the control. The significantly highest yield (124.44 q/ha) of healthy fruits was recorded in indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC followed by profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (114.52 q/ha) and chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC (112.70 q/ha). The highest incremental benefit cost ratio (12.45) was registered by indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC followed by profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (11.07) and chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC (9.66).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb plus acetamiprid was among the most effective treatments for reducing fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC @ 400 ml/ hae0
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=60)
Earias vittellat0pest - Outcome
- fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basise0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC @ 400 ml/ ha, profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC @1000 ml/ha and chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC @1000 ml/ha found to be the most effective in reducing the fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basis was 15.65 to 14.80 and 16.25 to 15.24%, respectively as against 32.14 and 31.31%in the control”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenophos plus cypermethrin was among the most effective treatments for reducing fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC @1000 ml/hae0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basise0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC @ 400 ml/ ha, profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC @1000 ml/ha and chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC @1000 ml/ha found to be the most effective in reducing the fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basis was 15.65 to 14.80 and 16.25 to 15.24%, respectively as against 32.14 and 31.31%in the control”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos plus cypermethrin was among the most effective treatments for reducing fruit infestation.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC @1000 ml/hae0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basise0
- Direction
- reducinge0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC @ 400 ml/ ha, profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC @1000 ml/ha and chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC @1000 ml/ha found to be the most effective in reducing the fruit infestation on number basis as well as weight basis was 15.65 to 14.80 and 16.25 to 15.24%, respectively as against 32.14 and 31.31%in the control”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb plus acetamiprid produced the highest healthy fruit yield, 124.44 q/ha.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SCe0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 124.44 q/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The significantly highest yield (124.44 q/ha) of healthy fruits was recorded in indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenophos plus cypermethrin yielded 114.52 q/ha healthy fruit.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 ECe0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 114.52 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (114.52 q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra”
e1“yield (124.44 q/ha) of healthy fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos plus cypermethrin yielded 112.70 q/ha healthy fruit.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 ECe0
- Interactor
- Earias vittellaEarias vittellat0pest
- Outcome
- yielde1
- Value
- 112.70 q/hae0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC (112.70 q/ha)”
t0“Earias vittella (Fabricius) on okra”
e1“yield (124.44 q/ha) of healthy fruits”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb plus acetamiprid gave the highest incremental benefit cost ratio, 12.45.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SCe0
- Outcome
- incremental benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 12.45e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest incremental benefit cost ratio (12.45) was registered by indoxacarb 14.5 SC + acetamiprid 7.7 SC”
t0“okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Profenophos plus cypermethrin gave an incremental benefit cost ratio of 11.07.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 ECe0
- Outcome
- incremental benefit cost ratioe1
- Value
- 11.07e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“profenophos 40 EC + cypermethrin 4 EC (11.07)”
t0“okra”
e1“incremental benefit cost ratio”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorpyriphos plus cypermethrin gave an incremental benefit cost ratio of 9.66.
- Taxon
- okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 ECe0
- Outcome
- incremental benefit cost ratioe1
- Value
- 9.66e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“chlorpyriphos 50 EC + cypermethrin 5 EC (9.66)”
t0“okra”
e1“incremental benefit cost ratio”
The same questions in other papers
chlorpyrifos · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →indoxacarb · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
9 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →cypermethrin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.