Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Efficacy of Selected Chemical Insecticides against Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)] on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]

Vankadavath Anil Kumar Naik; Anoorag R. Tayde; Chandra Ashok Sakharam

14
claims
56
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021 in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications. Eight treatments were evaluated against Earias vittella i.e., Flubendiamide @480% SC, Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC, Spinosad @ 45% SC, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC, Neem oil @ 2%, Emamectin benzoate @ 5% SG, Cypermethrin @ 25% EC and untreated Control.Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest. Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave lowest okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (8.02%,5.15%) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% ECe1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
loweste1
Value
8.02%,5.15%e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5% SG gave lower okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (9.26%, 6.75%) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
9.26%, 6.75%e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide@480% SC gave lower okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (10.29%, 7.48%) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Flubendiamide@480% SCe1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
10.29%, 7.48%e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin@25%EC gave lower okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (11.41%,9.24) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Cypermethrin@25%ECe1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
11.41%,9.24e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb @14.5% SC gave lower okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (12.32%,10.00%) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Indoxacarb @14.5% SCe1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
12.32%,10.00%e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad @ 45% SC gave lower okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (13.13%, 11.53%) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Spinosad @ 45% SCe1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
lowerinferrede1
Value
13.13%, 11.53%e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil @ 2% gave least effective okra shoot and fruitborer infestation (14.25%,12.70) against Earias vittella in the field among the tested treatments.

Treatment
Neem oil @ 2%e1
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
per cent infestatione1
Direction
least effectivee1
Value
14.25%,12.70e1
Comparator
different treatmentse1
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results revealed that, among the different treatments lowest per cent infestation of okra shoot and fruitborer was recorded in Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC (8.02%,5.15%). Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (9.26%, 6.75%) was found to be the next best treatment followed by Flubendiamide@480% SC (10.29%, 7.48%), Cypermethrin@25%EC (11.41%,9.24), Indoxacarb @14.5% SC (12.32%,10.00%), Spinosad @ 45% SC (13.13%, 11.53%) whereas Neem oil @ 2% (14.25%,12.70) was found to be least effective against this pest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave a marketing yield of 188 q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:8.41.

Treatment
Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% ECe5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higheste5
Value
188 q/hae5
Qualifier
1:8.41e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emamectin benzoate 5% SG gave a marketing yield of 176 q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:8.41.

Treatment
Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
176 q/hae5
Qualifier
1:8.41e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flubendiamide @ 480% SC gave a marketing yield of 152q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:7.18.

Treatment
Flubendiamide @ 480% SCe5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
152q/hae5
Qualifier
1:7.18e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cypermethrin @ 25% EC gave a marketing yield of 135q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:6.22.

Treatment
Cypermethrin @ 25% ECe5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
135q/hae5
Qualifier
1:6.22e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC gave a marketing yield of 121.2q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:5.74.

Treatment
Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SCe5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
121.2q/hae5
Qualifier
1:5.74e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad @ 45% SC gave a marketing yield of 114.6 q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:5.29.

Treatment
Spinosad @ 45% SCe5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
114.6 q/hae5
Qualifier
1:5.29e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil @ 2% gave a marketing yield of 102.4 q/ha in okra in the field, compared with the control plot, with a cost benefit ratio of 1:4.80.

Treatment
Neem oil @ 2%e5
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellat1pest
Outcome
marketing yielde5
Direction
higherinferrede5
Value
102.4 q/hae5
Qualifier
1:4.80e5
Comparator
control plote5
Setting
Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraje3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among the treatments, Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% EC gave the highest marketing yield and cost benefit ratio (188 q/ha and 1:8.41) followed by Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (176 q/ha and 1:8.41), Flubendiamide @ 480% SC (152q/ha and1:7.18), Cypermethrin @ 25% EC (135q/ha and1:6.22), Indoxacarb @ 14.5% SC (121.2q/ha and1:5.74), Spinosad @ 45% SC (114.6 q/ha and 1:5.29) and Neem oil @ 2% (102.4 q/ha and 1:4.80) as compared to control plot (87.2 q/ha and 1:4.2).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“on Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench.]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–147 · show in text ↑
t1

“Shoot and Fruitborer [Earias vittella (Fabricius)]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“A field trail was conducted at Central Research Farm (CRF), Naini, Prayagraj during Kharif from July to November 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–117 · show in text ↑

flubendiamide · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

indoxacarb · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cypermethrin · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

spinosad · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

emamectin benzoate · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.