Paper · 2007 · Pesticide Research Journal

Efficacy of Neonicotinoids against Okra Insect Pests

Sinha; Ravendra K. Sharma

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of six treatments against the insect pests of okra. Studies revealed that all those treatments that have neo-nicotinoids viz. as seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed) or follar spray of thiacloprid @ 20 g gi ha−1 or thiamethoxam @ 25 g ai ha−1 at 50 5ays of sowing were found effective in managing Amrasca biguttula biguttula population. The treatments with imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella and incurred 320.1,370.8% increase in yield over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neonicotinoid seed or foliar treatments effectively managed Amrasca biguttula biguttula.

Treatment
seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed)e0
Interactor
Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae0pest
Outcome
Amrasca biguttula biguttula populatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all those treatments that have neo-nicotinoids viz. as seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed) or follar spray of thiacloprid @ 20 g gi ha−1 or thiamethoxam @ 25 g ai ha−1 at 50 5ays of sowing were found effective in managing Amrasca biguttula biguttula population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–422 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid followed by cyhalothrin was among the most effective against Earias vittella, with 2.2% infestation.

Treatment
imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
infestationse0
Direction
onlye0
Value
2.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid followed by cyfluthrin was among the most effective against Earias vittella, with 3.2% infestation.

Treatment
β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
infestationse0
Direction
onlye0
Value
3.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plus cyhalothrin increased okra yield 320.1% over control.

Treatment
imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
320.1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella and incurred 320.1,370.8% increase in yield over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plus cyfluthrin increased okra yield 370.8% over control.

Treatment
β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1e0
Interactor
Earias vittellaEarias vittellae0pest
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
370.8%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Earias vittella
Earias vittella · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments with imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella and incurred 320.1,370.8% increase in yield over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–39 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

imidacloprid · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

seed treatment · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.