Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of six treatments against the insect pests of okra. Studies revealed that all those treatments that have neo-nicotinoids viz. as seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed) or follar spray of thiacloprid @ 20 g gi ha−1 or thiamethoxam @ 25 g ai ha−1 at 50 5ays of sowing were found effective in managing Amrasca biguttula biguttula population. The treatments with imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella and incurred 320.1,370.8% increase in yield over control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Neonicotinoid seed or foliar treatments effectively managed Amrasca biguttula biguttula.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed)e0
- Interactor
- Amrasca biguttula biguttulaAmrasca biguttula biguttulae0pest
- Outcome
- Amrasca biguttula biguttula populatione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“all those treatments that have neo-nicotinoids viz. as seed treatment with imidacloprid (3.0 or 5.4 g ai kg−1 seed) or follar spray of thiacloprid @ 20 g gi ha−1 or thiamethoxam @ 25 g ai ha−1 at 50 5ays of sowing were found effective in managing Amrasca biguttula biguttula population”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid followed by cyhalothrin was among the most effective against Earias vittella, with 2.2% infestation.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1e0
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellae0pest - Outcome
- infestationse0
- Direction
- onlye0
- Value
- 2.2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid followed by cyfluthrin was among the most effective against Earias vittella, with 3.2% infestation.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1e0
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellae0pest - Outcome
- infestationse0
- Direction
- onlye0
- Value
- 3.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus cyhalothrin increased okra yield 320.1% over control.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1e0
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellae0pest - Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 320.1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella and incurred 320.1,370.8% increase in yield over control”
t0“Okra”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid plus cyfluthrin increased okra yield 370.8% over control.
- Taxon
- Okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1e0
- Interactor
- Earias vittella
Earias vittellae0pest - Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 370.8%e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_Figure_26b.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The treatments with imidacloprid @ 3 g ai kg−1 followed by a foliar spray of γ-cyhalothrin @ 50 g ai ha−1 or β-cyfluthrin @ 11.75 5 gi ha−1 at 50 days of sowing were the most effective treatments and gave only 2.2 and 3.2% infestations, respectively, against Earias vittella and incurred 320.1,370.8% increase in yield over control”
t0“Okra”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →imidacloprid · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →seed treatment · Amrasca biguttula biguttula · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
application · Earias vittella · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.